| Quasi-empiricism In Mathematics |
Website Links For Mathematics |
Information AboutQuasi-empiricism In Mathematics |
| CATEGORIES ABOUT QUASI-EMPIRICISM IN MATHEMATICS | |
| philosophy of mathematics | |
| computer science | |
|
PRIMARY ARGUMENTS A primary argument is that whilst mathematics and physics are more frequently being considered as closely linked fields of study, this may reflect human Cognitive Bias . It is claimed that, despite rigorous application of appropriate Empirical Methods or Mathematical Practice in either field, this would nonetheless be insufficient to disprove alternate approaches. that this culture need not be restricted to mathematics, physics, or even humans. He stated further that "The miracle of the appropriateness of the language of mathematics for the formulation of the laws of physics is a wonderful gift which we neither understand nor deserve. We should be grateful for it and hope that it will remain valid in future research and that it will extend, for better or for worse, to our pleasure, even though perhaps also to our bafflement, to wide branches of learning." Wigner used several examples to demonstrate why 'bafflement' is an appropriate description, such as showing how mathematics adds to situational knowledge in ways that are either not possible otherwise or are so outside normal thought to be of little notice. The predictive ability, in the sense of describing potential phenomena prior to observation of such, which can be supported by a mathematical system would be another example. Following up on Wigner , Richard Hamming (1980) had four explanations for the 'effectiveness' that we see with mathematics and definitely saw this topic as worthy of discussion and study. :1) "We see what we look for." Why 'quasi' is apropos in reference to this discussion. 2) "We select the kind of mathematics to use." Our use and modification of mathematics is essentially situational and goal driven. 3) "Science in fact answers comparatively few problems." What still needs to be looked at is a larger set. 4) "The evolution of man provided the model." There may be limits attributable to the human element. Hilary Putnam (1975) Putnam, Hilary , 1975, ''Mind, Language, and Reality. Philosophical Papers, Volume 2''. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. ISBN 88-459-0257-9 stated that mathematics had accepted informal proofs and proof by authority, and had made and corrected errors all through its history. Also, he stated that Euclid 's system of proving Geometry theorems was unique to the Classical Greeks and did not evolve similarly in other mathematical cultures in China , India , and Arabia . This and other evidence led many mathematicians to reject the label of Platonists , along with Plato's Ontology —which, along with the methods and epistemology of Aristotle , had served as a Foundation Ontology for the Western world since its beginnings. A truly international culture of mathematics would, Putnam and others (1983)
Imre Lakatos (1976 - posthumous), ), argued for ' Research Programs ' as a means to support a basis for mathematics and considered Thought Experiments as appropriate to mathematical discovery. Lakatos may have been the first to use 'quasi-empiricism' in the context of this subject. Operational aspects Recent work that pertains to this topic are several. Gregory Chaitin 's and Stephen Wolfram 's work, though their positions may be considered controversial, apply. Chaitin (1997/2003) , 2002) Wolfram, Stephen , 2002, ''A New Kind of Science'' ( Undecidables ), Wolfram Media, Chicago, IL. ISBN 1-57955-008-8 argues that undecidability may have practical relevance, that is, be more than an abstraction. Another relevant addition would be the discussions concerning Interactive Computation , especially those related to the meaning and use of Turing 's model ( Church-Turing , TM , etc.). These works are heavily computational and raise another set of issues. To quote Chaitin (1997/2003): "Now everything has gone topsy-turvy. It's gone topsy-turvy, not because of any philosophical argument, not because of Gödel 's results or Turing 's results or my own incompleteness results. It's gone topsy-turvy for a very simple reason — the computer!". The collection of "Undecidables" in Wolfram ( A New Kind Of Science , 2002) is another example. Wegner's recent paper Peter Wegner , Dina Goldin, 2006, '' Principles of Problem Solving ''. Communications of the ACM 49 (2006), pp.27-29 suggests that '' Interactive Computation '' can help mathematics form a more appropriate framework ( Empirical ) than can be founded with Rationalism alone. Related to this argument is that the Function (even recursively related ad infinitum) is too simple of a construct to handle the reality of entities that resolve (via computation or some type of analog) n-dimensional (general sense of the word) systems. In his Black Swan Theory , Taleb argues that our Cognitive biases may place too heavy reliance on what we can know via mathematics. REFERENCES SEE ALSO
|
|
|