Pop Psychology Article Index for
Pop
Website Links For
Popular
 

Information About

Pop Psychology




The term is often derogatory, used to describe psychological concepts that are oversimplified, out of date, unproven, misunderstood or misinterpreted; however, the term may also be used to describe professionally-produced psychological knowledge, regarded by most experts as valid and effective, that is intended for use by the general public.''APA Dictionary of Psychology'', 1st ed., Gary R. VandenBos, ed., Washington: American Psychological Association, 2007.


TYPES OF POPULAR PSYCHOLOGY

Popular psychology commonly takes the form of:



POPULAR PSYCHOLOGY AND SELF-HELP

Popular psychology is an essential ingredient of the gigantic Self Help industry. Cushman, P. (1990) "Why the self is empty: Toward a historically situated psychology. ''American Psychologist'', 45, 599-611. Cited in Fried, Stephen. (1998) "An Undergraduate Course in American Popular Psychology." ''Teaching of Psychology'' Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 38-39.

According to Fried and Shultis, criteria for a good self-help book include "claims made by the author as to the book's efficacy, the presentation of problem-solving strategies based on scientific evidence and professional experience, the clarity of the writing, the author's credentials and professional experience, and the inclusion of a bibliography." Fried, S.B., and Shultis, G.A. (1995) "The best self-help and self-awareness books: A topic-by-topic guide to quality information." Chicago: American Library Association Editions. Cited in Fried, Stephen. (1998) "An Undergraduate Course in American Popular Psychology." ''Teaching of Psychology'' Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 38-39.

Three potential dangers of self-help books are: Craighead, L., McNamara, K., and Horan, J. (1984) "Perspectives on self-help and bibliotherapy: You are what you read." In S. Brown and R. Lent (eds.), ''Handbook of counselling psychology.'' New York: Wiley.
Pp 878 – 929. Cited in Fried, Stephen. (1998) "An Undergraduate Course in American Popular Psychology." ''Teaching of Psychology'' Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 38-39.
  • people may falsely label themselves as psychologically disturbed;

  • people may misdiagnose themselves and use material that deals with the wrong problem;

  • people may not be able to evaluate a program and may select an ineffective one;



POP PSYCHOLOGISTS

Some figures/movements characterized at varying times as exponents of pop psychology include:



SEE ALSO



FOR FURTHER READING

  • Mark Jarzombek , ''The Psychologizing of Modernity''. Cambridge University Press, 2000.

  • Justman, Stewart. ''Fool's paradise : the unreal world of pop psychology.'' Chicago: Ivan R. Dee, 2005. ISBN 1566636280.

  • Stewart argues that influential self-help gurus misuse the rhetoric of civil rights and 1960s dissent in preaching liberation from guilt, "artificial distinctions," and virtually everything else in the pursuit of self-realization.

    • Cordón, Luis A. ''Popular psychology : an encyclopedia.'' Westport, Conn. : Greenwood Press, 2005. ISBN 0313324573.

    • The goal is "to try to counteract the tide of misleading information about the field of psychology with a concise guide to some things that the well-informed student of psychology and the interested general public ought to know."



      REFERENCES