Plagiarism Article Index for
Plagiarism
Website Links For
Plagiarism
 

Information About

Plagiarism




Plagiarism (from Latin ''plagiare'' "to kidnap") is the practice of falsely claiming, or implying, original authorship or of incorporating material from someone else's written or creative work, in whole or in part, into one's own without adequate acknowledgement. Unlike cases of Forgery , in which the authenticity of the writing, document, or some other kind of object, itself is in question, plagiarism is concerned with the issue of false attribution. Plagiarism can also occur unconsciously; in some cultures certain forms of plagiarism are accepted because the concept can be interpreted differently.

Within Academia , plagiarism by students, professors, or researchers is considered Academic Dishonesty or Academic Fraud and offenders are subject to academic censure. In Journalism , plagiarism is considered a breach of journalistic ethics, and reporters caught Plagiarizing typically face disciplinary measures ranging from suspension to termination. Some individuals caught plagiarizing in academic or journalistic contexts claim that they plagiarized unintentionally, by failing to include Quotation s or give the appropriate Citation . While plagiarism in scholarship and journalism has a centuries-old history, the development of the Internet , where articles appear as electronic text, has made the physical act of copying the work of others much easier, simply by copying and pasting text from one web page to another.

Plagiarism is different from Copyright Infringement . While both terms may apply to a particular act, they emphasize different aspects of the transgression. Copyright infringement is a violation of the rights of the copyright holder, when material is used without the copyright holder's consent. On the other hand, plagiarism is concerned with the unearned increment to the plagiarizing author's Reputation that is achieved through false claims of authorship.


SANCTIONS



Academia


In the academic world, plagiarism by students is a very serious offense that can result in punishments such as a failing grade on the particular assignment (typically at the high school level) or a failing grade for the course (typically at the college or university level). For cases of repeated plagiarism, or for cases where a student has committed a severe type of plagiarism (e.g., copying an entire article and submitting it as their own work), a student may be suspended or expelled, and any academic degrees or awards may be revoked.

Repetition in student projects or paper topics between academic terms and years provides students with ample resources from which to plagiarize. Many students feel pressured to get papers done well and quickly, and with the accessibility of new technology (The Internet) it is quite possible for students to plagiarize by copying and pasting information from another source. This type of plagiarism is often easily detected by teachers, for several reasons. First, students' choice of sources is frequently unoriginal as well; instructors may receive the same passage copied from a popular source (such as Wikipedia ) from several students. Second, it is often easy to tell whether or not a student is using his or her own "voice." Third, students may choose sources which are inappropriate, off-topic, or even wrong. Fourth, many universities now use plagiarism detection software.Some students still send plagiarized papers to plagiarism detectors. http://www.nysun.com/article/56158, http://individual.utoronto.ca/alex_klein/PublicPhil.htm

There is little academic research into the frequency of plagiarism in high schools, because much of the research has investigated plagiarism at the post-secondary level.http://www.ejel.org/volume-2/vol2-issue1/issue1-art25.htm research Of the forms of cheating (including plagiarism, inventing data, and cheating during an exam), students admit to plagiarism more than any other. However, this figure decreases considerably when students are asked about the frequency of "serious" plagiarism (such as copying most of an assignment or purchasing a complete paper from a website). Recent use of plagiarism detection software (see below) has given a more accurate picture of this activity's prevalence.

For professors and researchers, plagiarism is punished by sanctions ranging from suspension to termination, along with the loss of credibility and integrity. Charges of plagiarism against students and professors are typically heard by internal disciplinary committees, which students and professors have agreed to be bound by.


Journalism


Since journalism's main currency is public trust, a reporter's failure to honestly acknowledge their sources undercuts a newspaper or television news show's integrity and undermines its credibility. Journalists accused of plagiarism are often suspended from their reporting tasks while the charges are being looked into by the news organization.

The ease in copying electronic text from the Internet has lured a number of reporters into acts of plagiarism; column writers have been caught 'copying and pasting' articles and text from a number of websites.


Online Plagiarism


Since it is very easy to steal content from the web by simply copying and pasting, the problem of online plagiarism is growing. This phenomenon, also known as content scraping, is affecting both established sites Authorship gets lost on Web. http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/2006-07-31-net-plagiarism_x.htm?POE=TECISVA and blogs Online plagiarism strikes blog world. http://www.boston.com/business/articles/2006/05/08/online_plagiarism_strikes_blog_world/. The motivation is often to attract away part or all of the original site's Search Engine -generated Web Traffic and to convert these stolen visitors into revenue through the use of Online Ads .

Free online tools are becoming available to detect and prevent plagiarism http://news.com.com/8301-10784_3-5663303-7.html, http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/2005/08/30/copyscape-searches-for-scraped-content, and there are a range of approaches that attempt to limit online copying, such as Disabling Right Clicking and placing warning banners against plagiarism on web pages. Once identified, instances of plagiarism are commonly addressed by the rightful content owners sending a DMCA removal notice to the offending site-owner, or to the ISP that is hosting the offending site.


Other contexts


Generally, although plagiarism is often loosely referred to as theft or stealing, it has not been set as a criminal matter in the courts.http://faculty.law.lsu.edu/stuartgreen/pdf/j-green2.pdf Stuart Green Likewise, plagiarism has no standing as a '' Criminal '' offense in the Common Law . Instead, claims of plagiarism are a Civil Law matter, which an aggrieved person can resolve by launching a lawsuit. Acts that may constitute plagiarism are in some instances treated as Copyright Infringement , Unfair Competition , or a violation of the doctrine of Moral Rights . The increased availability of intellectual property due to a rise in technology has furthered the debate as to whether copyright offences are criminal.


SELF-PLAGIARISM


Self-plagiarism is the reuse of significant, identical, or nearly identical portions of one’s own work without acknowledging that one is doing so or without citing the original work. Typically, high public-interest texts are not a subject of self-plagiarism; however, the authors should not violate copyright where applicable. "Public-interest texts" include such material as social, professional, and cultural opinions usually published in newspapers and magazines.

In academic fields, self-plagiarism is a problem when an author reuses portions of his or her own published and copyrighted work in subsequent publications, but without attributing the previous publication.1 Identifying self-plagiarism is often difficult because of legal issues regarding Fair Use .2 Some professional organizations like the Association For Computing Machinery (ACM) have created policies that deal specifically with self-plagiarism.3 As compared to plagiarism, self-plagiarism is not yet very well-regulated. Some universities and editorial boards chose to not regulate it at all; those consider the term ''self-plagiarism'' Oxymoron ic since a person cannot be accused of stealing from himself.

For authors wishing to avoid potential issues when authoring new papers, the authors are strongly encouraged to follow these "best practices":
# Provide full disclosure — mention in the introduction that the new or derivative work incorporates texts previously published.
# Ensure there is no violation of copyright.
# Cite the old works in the references section of the new work.


ORGANIZATIONAL PUBLICATIONS


Plagiarism is presumably not an issue when organizations issue collective unsigned works since they do not assign credit for originality to particular people. For example, the American Historical Association 's "Statement on Standards of Professional Conduct" (2005) regarding textbooks and reference books states that there is no question about taking credit for someone else's ideas. Since textbooks and encyclopedias are summaries of other scholars' work, they are not bound by the same exacting standards of attribution as original research. However, even such a book does not make use of words, phrases, or paragraphs from another text or follow too closely the other text's arrangement and organization.

Within an organization, in its own working documents, standards are looser but not non-existent. If someone helped with a report, they expect to be credited. If a paragraph comes from a law report, a citation is expected to be written down. Technical manuals routinely copy facts from other manuals without attribution, because they assume a common spirit of scientific endeavor (as evidenced, for example, in Free and Open Source software projects) in which scientists freely share their work.

The ''Microsoft Manual of Style for Technical Publications'' Third Edition (2003) by Microsoft does not even mention plagiarism, nor does ''Science and Technical Writing: A Manual of Style'', Second Edition (2000) by Philip Rubens. The line between permissible literary and impermissible source code plagiarism, though, is apparently quite fine. As with any technical field, computer programming makes use of what others have contributed to the general knowledge.

It is common for university researchers to rephrase and republish their own work, tailoring it for different academic journals and newspaper articles, to disseminate their work to the widest possible interested public. However, it must be borne in mind that these researchers also obey limits: If half an article is the same as a previous one, it will be rejected. One of the functions of the process of Peer Review in academic writing is to prevent this type of 'recycling'.

Public figures commonly use anonymous speech writers. If a speech uses copied material, however, it is the public figure who will be embarrassed. Delaware Senator Joe Biden was forced out of the 1988 US Presidential race (but remained in the US Senate) when it was discovered that parts of his campaign speeches were plagiarized from speeches by British Labor party leader Neil Kinnock and Robert Kennedy .


EXAMPLES OF PURPORTED OR ACTUAL PLAGIARISM



Academia


  • James A. Mackay , a Scottish historian, was forced to withdraw all copies of his biography of Alexander Graham Bell from circulation in 1998 because he plagiarized the last major work on the subject, a 1973 work. Also accused of plagiarizing material on biographies of Mary Queen Of Scots , Andrew Carnegie , and Sir William Wallace , he was forced to withdraw his next work, on John Paul Jones , in 1999 for an identical reason.45

  • Marks Chabedi, a professor at the University Of The Witwatersrand in South Africa, plagiarized his doctoral thesis. He used a work written by Kimberly Lanegran at the University Of Florida and copied it nearly verbatim before submitting it to The New School . When Lanegran discovered this, she launched an investigation into Chabedi. He was fired from his professorship, and The New School revoked his Ph.D. {Link without Title} (The OCLC numbers for the dissertations are AAG9801108 and AAI9980001.)

  • Historian Stephen Ambrose has been criticized for incorporating passages from the works of other authors into many of his books. He was first accused in 2002 by two writers for copying portions about World War II bomber pilots from Thomas Childers 's ''The Wings of Morning'' in his book ''The Wild Blue''.6 After Ambrose admitted to the errors, the '' New York Times '' found further unattributed passages, and "Mr. Ambrose again acknowledged his errors and promised to correct them in later editions."7

  • Author Doris Kearns Goodwin interviewed author Lynne McTaggart in her 1987 book ''The Fitzgeralds and the Kennedys'', and she used passages from McTaggart's book about Kathleen Kennedy. In 2002, when the similarities between Goodwin's and McTaggart's books became public, Goodwin stated that she had an understanding that citations would not be required for all references, and that extensive footnotes already existed. Many doubted her claims, and she was forced to resign from the Pulitzer Prize board. {Link without Title} {Link without Title} {Link without Title}

  • Mathematician and computer scientist Dănuţ Marcu claims to have published over 383 original papers in various scientific publications. A number of his recent papers have been proven to be exact copies of papers published earlier by other people. http://l1.lamsade.dauphine.fr/~bouyssou/Marcu.pdf

  •   Title Report of the Investigative Committee of the Standing Committee on Research Misconduct at the University of Colorado at Boulder concerning Allegations of Academic Misconduct against Professor Ward Churchill
      First1 Marianne last1 = Wesson
      First2 Robert last2 = Clinton
      First3 José last3 = Limón
      First4 Marjorie last4 = McIntosh
      First5 Michael last5 = Radelet
      Year 2006
      Month May 9
      Publisher University of Colorado at Boulder
      Url http://wwwcoloradoedu/news/reports/churchill/download/WardChurchillReportpdf


  Title Ward Churchill The Research Misconduct Inquiry
  Work coloradoedu
  Url http://wwwcoloradoedu/news/reports/churchill/
  Accessdate 2006-07-03




Business


On 6 June 2007, the Financial Times published a front page article under the headline: "Pipeliners All!’ Shell’s memo to Sakhalin

The article was about a leaked motivational memo in the form of an email from David Greer, the deputy chief executive of Sakhalin Energy circulated to Sakhalin-2 staff. Some keen eyed readers noticed that inspirational passages were appropriated from a famous speech given by the legendary U.S. General George S. Patton , on 5 June 1944 on the eve of D-Day the Sixth of June. On 7 June 2007, a quarter page follow-up article was published in the Financial Times newspaper and on the FT.com website, under the headline: "Sakhalin motivational memo borrows heavily from Patton” "www.royaldutchshellplc.com - Sakhalin motivational memo borrows heavily from Patton” .

On Monday 11 June 2007, the ''Financial Times'' published another article at www.tellshell.com on the subject, this time headlined: ''“Motivational memos must make their message clear”.'' One of the opening paragraphs stated: ''“The memo (www.ft.com/shell) is crass, poorly punctuated and most of it wasn't even written by its author, David Greer , deputy chief executive of Royal Dutch Shell 's Sakhalin Energy Investment Company. He had lifted the words of General George S. Patton with no attribution, and clumsily adapted them to spur on his team of recalcitrant pipeline engineers”''.

On 9 June 2007, The Moscow Times published a front page article on the controversy headlined: ''Sakhalin Pep Talk From ‘Old Blood and Guts'''.

There is a Wikipedia entry covering the David Greer memo affair entitled: Plagiarism Controversy Over Sakhalin-2 Motivational Memo


Computer games




Film




Journalism




Literature




In his report submitted to the court in this lawsuit, Professor of English and expert witness on plagiarism, Michael Wood of Columbia University, stated: "The evidence of copying from ''The African'' in both the novel and the television dramatization of ''Roots'' is clear and irrefutable. The copying is significant and extensive....''Roots''...plainly uses ''The African'' as a model: as something to be copied at some times, and at other times to be modified; but always, it seems, to be consulted. . . . ''Roots'' takes from ''The African'' phrases, situations, ideas, aspects of style and of plot. . . . ''Roots'' finds in ''The African'' essential elements for its depiction of such things as a slave's thoughts of escape, the psychology of an old slave, the habits of mind of the hero, and the whole sense of life on an infamous slave ship. Such things are the life of a novel; and when they appear in ''Roots'', they are the life of someone else's novel."

After a five-week trial in federal district court, Courlander and Haley settled the case, with Haley making a financial settlement and a statement that "Alex Haley acknowledges and regrets that various materials from ''The African'' by Harold Courlander found their way into his book ''Roots''."

During the trial, presiding U.S. District Court Judge Robert J. Ward stated, "Copying there is, period." In a later interview with BBC Television, Judge Ward stated, "Alex Haley perpetrated a hoax on the public."

During the trial, Alex Haley had maintained that he had not read ''The African'' before writing Roots. Shortly after the trial, however, an instructor of black literature at Skidmore College, Joseph Bruchac, came forward. He swore in an affidavit that in 1970 or 1971 (five or six years before the publication of ''Roots'') he had discussed ''The African'' with Haley and had, in fact, given his "own personal copy of ''The African'' to Mr. Haley."



Music




Politics



Senator Joseph Biden




Iraq War




Vladimir Putin




Wikipedia




Other instances



Martin Luther King, Jr.


See Also: Martin Luther King, Jr. authorship issues





William H. Swanson




Lyle Menendez




SEE ALSO




REFERENCES



EXTERNAL LINKS