| Massachusetts Constitutional Convention Of 1853 |
Article Index for Massachusetts |
Website Links For Massachusetts |
Information AboutMassachusetts Constitutional Convention Of 1853 |
| CATEGORIES ABOUT MASSACHUSETTS CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION OF 1853 | |
| history of massachusetts | |
| constitutional convention of 1853 | |
| 1853 in the united states | |
| constitutional conventions | |
|
BACKGROUND recommended an amendment giving smaller towns an unfair advantage over the larger ones, and it failed to reach the required two-thirds majority in the House . However, the drive for reform persisted, and a Senate bill provided that the people be asked whether they wished for a constitutional convention. The bill passed, but on November 10, 1851 the idea of a convention was rejected by a vote of 65,846 against to 60,972 in favor.''ibid.'', p. 20. Undeterred, the Legislature on May 7, 1852 passed “An Act relating to the calling a Convention of Delegates of the People, for the purpose of revising the Constitution". On November 8''Journal of the Constitutional Convention of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Begun and Held in Boston, on the Fourth Day of May, 1853'', p. 1. Boston, White & Potter, 1853. of that year, the following question was answered in the affirmative by the voters: Is it expedient that delegates should be chosen to meet in convention for the purpose of revising or altering the Constitution of government of this Commonwealth? Delegates to the Convention were elected on March 7, 1853, with each town entitled to the same number of delegates as it had representatives in the Massachusetts House of Representatives. THE CONVENTION The Constitutional Convention met at 12 noon''Bulletins for the Constitutional Convention, 1917-1918. Volume I: Bulletins 1 to 16'', p. 11. Boston, Wright & Potter Printing Company, 1918. on Wednesday, May 4, 1853, at the State House in Boston .1853 Journal, p. 8. There were around 420 delegates,Glasser, p. 20. though often substantially fewer were actually present for votes. For instance, on a vote taken in the session of July 28, regarding Proposition Number Five, only 165 members–less than half the full body–were present and voting.1853 Journal, p. 306. There is no record of any oath having been used to swear in the members.1917 Bulletins, p. 13. Every delegate was male. On the first day of the Convention, a President was elected. Of 394 votes cast, the winner, Nathaniel Prentice Banks , received 250. George N. Briggs got 137 votes, with four others winning one vote each.1853 Journal, p. 4. Also on the Convention's opening day, one man from each county was selected in order to sit on a committee to establish how best to proceed. They reported back two days later with a recommendation of standing committees.1917 Bulletins, p. 16. These were as follows:1853 Journal, pp. 27-30. Additionally, during the course of its business, the Convention found it expedient to organize Committees on Vacancies; the Adoption of the Principle of Plurality in Elections; the Loan and Credit of the State; Banking Corporations; General Corporations; and on the Order of Business.1917 Bulletins, p. 21. Finally, although the Legislature had abandoned this device some years previous, the Convention met several times as a Committee Of The Whole ; this allowed it to circumvent some of the cumbersome rules of procedure normally used and to quickly gauge the support of a particular measure.''ibid.'', p. 25. As for petitions, they "could be presented to the Convention only on introduction by a delegate."''ibid.'', p. 26. Fifteen Ministers were in attendance; on the second day of the Convention, Rev. Warren Burton was elected Chaplain from among these. Of 385 votes cast, he received 224, with Lyman Beecher garnering 129, James D. Farnsworth, 17, and the rest one or two votes apiece.1853 Journal, p. 11. Other prominent attendees included Charles Sumner , Henry Wilson , Robert Rantoul, Jr. Glasser, p. 20., and George N. Briggs .1853 Journal, p. 4. The Convention came up with eight proposals, which are enumerated below. After 72 days of work, it 114,092 for the Convention.''ibid.'', p. 422. CLOSING SPEECH AND PROPOSALS At Convention's closing session, Mr. Boutwell of Berlin addressed a message to the people.''ibid.'', pp. 415-421. He noted that Up to that point, the Massachusetts Constitution had been amended 13 times, and some of those provisions had rendered parts of the document's original body inoperative. Boutwell asserted that “Constitutional laws should be plain, that they may be impartially interpreted and faithfully executed, ‘that every man may at all times find his security in them’".''ibid.'', p. 416. Proposition Number One adopted by the Convention and to be submitted to the people for a vote consisted of a new Constitution overhauling that of 1780. Boutwell enumerated its main points:
Additionally, and this was not mentioned by Boutwell, the Constitution provided that the Tuesday after the first Monday in November was to be the State election day, so as to align with the Congressional election day.Glasser, p. 21. Boutwell closed by calling the adoption or revision of a constitution “an epoch in the history of a free people,” stating that “We have no doubt that your decision will…under Divine Providence,…render more and more illustrious our ancient Commonwealth.”1853 Journal, p. 421. In addition to the new constitution, seven distinct amendments were proposed, numbered two through eight, as the constitution was number one. They were as follows:''ibid.'', p. 414-5. Proposition Number Two The writ of habeas corpus shall be granted as of right in all cases in which a discretion is not especially conferred upon the court by the Legislature; but the Legislature may prescribe forms of proceeding preliminary to the obtaining of the writ. Proposition Number Three In all trials for criminal offences, the jury, after having received the instruction of the court, shall have the right, in their verdict of guilty or not guilty, to determine the law and the facts of the case, but it shall be the duty of the court to superintend the course of the trials, to decide upon the admission and rejection of evidence, and upon all questions of law raised during the trials, and upon all collateral and incidental proceedings; and also to allow bills of exceptions. And the court may grant a new trial in case of conviction. Proposition Number Four Every person having a claim against the Commonwealth, ought to have a judicial remedy therefor. Proposition Number Five No person shall be imprisoned for any debt hereafter contracted, unless in cases of fraud. Proposition Number Six All moneys raised by taxation in the towns and cities, for the support of public schools, and all moneys which may be appropriated by the State for the support of common schools, shall be supplied to and expended in no other schools than those which are conducted according to law, under the order and superintendence of the authorities of the town or city in which the money is to be expended; and such moneys shall never be appropriated to any religious sect, for the maintenance, exclusively, of its own schools. Proposition Number Seven The Legislature shall not create corporations by special act, when the object of the incorporation is attainable by general laws. Proposition Number Eight The Legislature shall have no power to pass any act granting any special charter for banking purposes, or any special act to increase the capital stock of any chartered bank; but corporations may be formed for such purposes, or the capital stock of chartered banks may be increased, under general laws. The Legislature shall provide by law for the registry of all notes or bills authorized by general laws to be issued or put in circulation as money; and shall require ample security for the redemption of such notes in specie. RESULTS On November 11, 1853, the proposals of the Constitutional Convention were placed before the voters. Every single one, including the new Constitution, went down in defeat. The results for individual questions are shown below.''ibid.'', p. 541. The counties of Barnstable , Dukes , Essex , Hampshire , Middlesex , Nantucket , Norfolk , Plymouth , and Suffolk rejected every proposal. On the other hand, the counties of Berkshire , Franklin , Hampden , and Worcester voted in favor of each proposal, with support strongest in Worcester County, which approved each question by a margin of around 13,000 to 7,500. Bristol County was nearly evenly split on the questions, with proposals 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, and 8 carrying by margins of 31, 15, 74, 7, 54, and 35, respectively, while proposals 3 and 6 lost by 115 and 32 votes, respectively. ANALYSIS OF THE DEFEAT Had the Convention submitted its proposed changes as individual amendments, "undoubtedly it would have proved a success,"Glasser, p. 21. as evidenced by the adoption of most of its proposals as amendments in the coming years. The trouble was that it "did not know where to begin and where to end."''ibid.'' On the one hand, it left the House of Representatives elected by the same method as before, and representation, since 1780 a contentious issue, "had been the real cause for the convocation of the convention."''ibid.'' On the other hand, it took the radical step of reducing judges' terms from life to ten years for the SJC and Court of Common Pleas and three years for probate judges. This change "was too much; it brought down a veritable storm of excoriation upon the convention and its work, and resulted in the flat rejection of the whole."''ibid.'' PARTIAL VINDICATION Although its ambitious proposals were all rejected, the Convention's work was not for nothing. A series of constitutional amendments passed over the next few years incorporated many of the same changes into the Constitution. Amendments XIV through XIX have a clear "post-convention" character to them, having been adopted by the 1854 and 1855 Legislatures and approved by the people on May 23, 1855.
Amendments XXI and XXII also bear the stamp of the Convention's influence; they were adopted by the 1856 and 1857 Legislatures and approved by the people on May 1, 1857.
Finally, Amendment XXXIV, adopted by the 1891 and 1892 Legislatures and approved by the people on November 8, 1892, abolished the property requirement for Governors and Lieutenant Governors. REFERENCES |
|
|