| Hull-kernel Topology |
Website Links For Spectrum |
Information AboutHull-kernel Topology |
|
One of the most important applications of this concept is to provide a notion of Dual object for any Locally Compact Group . This dual object is suitable for formulating a Fourier Transform and a Plancherel Theorem for Unimodular Separable locally compact groups of type I and a decomposition theorem for arbitrary representations of separable locally compact groups of type I. The resulting duality theory for locally compact groups is however much weaker than the Tannaka-Krein Duality theory for Compact Topological Group s or Pontryagin Duality for locally compact ''abelian'' groups, both of which are complete invariants. That the dual is not a complete invariant is easily seen as the dual of any finite dimensional full matrix algebra M''n''(C) consists of a single point. PRIMITIVE SPECTRUM The Topology of ''Â'' can be defined in several equivalent ways. We first define it in terms of the primitive spectrum .
: Hull-kernel closure is easily shown to be an Idempotent operation, that is : and it can be shown to satisfy the Kuratowski Closure Axioms . As a consequence, it can be shown that there is a unique topology τ on Prim(''A'') such the closure of a set ''X'' with respect to τ is identical to the hull-kernel closure of ''X''. Since unitarily equivalent representations have the same kernel, the map π ker(π) factors through a Surjective map : We use the map ''k'' to define the topology on ''Â'' as follows: Definition. The open sets of ''Â'' are inverse images ''k''−1(''U'') of open subsets ''U'' of Prim(''A''). This is indeed a topology. The hull-kernel topology is an analogue for non-commutative rings of the Zariski Topology for commutative rings. The topology on ''Â'' induced from the hull-kernel topology has other characterizations in terms of State s of ''A''. EXAMPLES
: This mapping is defined by :
:
Thus Prim(''L''(''H'')) is a non-Hausdorff space. The spectrum of ''L''(''H'') on the other hand is much larger. There are many inequivalent irreducible representations with kernel ''K''(''H'') or with kernel {0}.
:
: OTHER CHARACTERIZATIONS OF THE SPECTRUM
In fact, the topology on ''Â'' is intimately connected with the concept of Weak Containment of representations as is shown by the following: Theorem. Let ''S'' be subset of ''Â''. Then the following are equivalent for an irreducile representation π # The equivalence class of π in ''Â'' is in the closure of ''S'' # Every state associated to π, that is one of the form :: |
|
|