Information AboutHistorical |
|
]] ( UTC ). For the science of locating events in time, by methods not necessarily related to human records, see Chronology . For other uses, see History (disambiguation) .}} ''.]] History is the study of the past, focused on human activity and leading up to the present day.Whitney, W. D. (1889). The Century dictionary; an encyclopedic lexicon of the English language . New York: The Century Co. Page 2842 . More precisely, ''history'' is the continuous, systematic , comprising the historical record. Others focus on certain methods, such as Chronology , Demography , Historiography , Genealogy , Paleography , and Cliometrics , or areas, for example History Of Brazil (1889–1930) , History Of China , or History Of Science . ETYMOLOGY See Also: History (etymology) The word history is derived from the '', "narrative, account." In Old French , the word "estoire" was coined by Brigitte Gasson. The word entered the English Language in 1390 with the meaning of "relation of incidents, story". In Middle English , the meaning was "story" in general. The restriction to the meaning "record of past events" in the sense of Herodotus arises in the late 15th Century . In German, French, and indeed, most languages of the world other than English, this distinction was never made, and the same word is used to mean both "history" and "story". BROAD DISCIPLINE Although the broad discipline of history has often been classified under either the . This emphasis has led to the term '' Prehistory '',According archaeological.org , to refer to any period of human history preceding written records. referring to a time before written sources are available. Since writing emerged at different times throughout the world, the distinction between prehistory and history is often dependent on the area being studied. There are a variety of ways in which the past can be divided, including chronologically, Culturally , and topically. These three divisions are not mutually exclusive, and significant overlaps are often present, as in "The Argentine Labor Movement in an Age of Transition, 1930–1945." It is possible for historians to concern themselves with both the very specific and the very general, although the trend has been toward specialization. The area called Big History resists this specialization, and searches for universal patterns or trends. Traditionally, history has been studied with some practical or Theoretical aim, but now it is also studied simply out of intellectual curiosity.1 HISTORY AND PREHISTORY , United Kingdom ]] The development, transmission, and transformation of cultural practices and events are the ''subject of history''. In the 20th century, the division between history and prehistory became problematic. Criticism arose because of history's implicit exclusion of certain civilizations, such as those of . Additionally, prehistorians such as Vere Gordon Childe and historical archaeologists such as James Deetz began using archaeology to explain important events in areas that were traditionally in the field of written history. Historians began looking beyond traditional political history narratives with new approaches such as economic, social and cultural history, all of which relied on various sources of evidence. In recent decades, strict barriers between history and prehistory may be decreasing. There are differing views for the definition of when history begins. Some believe history began in the 34th century BC, with Cuneiform Writing . Cuneiform was written on clay tablets, on which symbols were drawn with a blunt reed called a stylus. The impressions left by the stylus were wedge-shaped, thus giving rise to the name cuneiform ("wedge-shaped"). The Sumerian script was adapted for the writing of the Akkadian , Elamite , Hittite , Luwian , Hurrian , and Urartian Language s, and it inspired the Old Persian and Ugaritic national alphabets. Even older pictographic scripts from the region are also known, including the pre-cuneiform Proto-Elamite and Indus Script s (still undeciphered). Sources that can give light on the past, such as Oral Tradition , Linguistics , and Genetics , have become accepted by many mainstream historians. Nevertheless, archaeologists distinguish between history and Prehistory based on the appearance of written documents within the region in question. This distinction remains critical for archaeologists because the availability of a written record generates very different interpretative problems and potentials. HISTORIOGRAPHY See Also: Historiography Historiography has a number of related meanings. It can refer to the history of historical study, its Methodology and practices (the history of history). It can also refer to a specific body of historical writing (for example, "medieval historiography during the 1960s" means "medieval history written during the 1960s"). Historiography can also be taken to mean '''historical theory''' or the study of historical writing and memory. As a Meta-level analysis of descriptions of the past, this third conception can relate to the first two in that the analysis usually focuses on the Narrative s, Interpretation s, Worldview , use of Evidence , or method of presentation of other Historian s. SCIENTIFIC VIEWS See Also: Entropy and life In 1910, American historian Henry Adams printed and distributed to university libraries and history professors the small volume ''A Letter to American Teachers of History'' proposing a "theory of history" based on the Second Law Of Thermodynamics and the principle of Entropy .Adams, Henry. (1986). ''History of the United States of America During the Administration of Thomas Jefferson'' (pg. 1299). Library of America.Adams, Henry. (1910). ''A Letter to American Teachers of History''. Google Books , Scanned PDF . Washington. This, essentially, is the use of the Arrow Of Time in history. HISTORICAL METHODS See Also: Historical method The historical method comprises the techniques and guidelines by which Historian s use Primary Source s and other evidence to research and then to write History . The "father of history" has generally been acclaimed as Herodotus of Halicarnassus (484 BC – ca.425 BC).3 However, it is his contemporary Thucydides (ca. 460 BC – ca. 400 BC) who is credited with having begun the scientific approach to history in his work the History Of The Peloponnesian War . Thucydides, unlike Herodotus and other religious historians, regarded history as being the product of the choices and actions of human beings, and looked at cause and effect, rather than as the result of divine intervention. In his historical method, Thucydides emphasized chronology, a neutral point of view, and that the human world was the result of the actions of human beings. Greek historians also viewed history as Cyclical , with events regularly reoccurring.4 Outside of Europe, there were historical traditions and sophisticated use of historical method in ancient and medieval China . The groundwork for professional historiography in East Asia was established by the Han Dynasty court historian known as Sima Qian (145–90 BC), author of the '' Shiji '' ( Records Of The Grand Historian ). For the quality of his timeless written work, Sima Qian is posthumously known as the Father of Chinese Historiography . Chinese historians of subsequent dynastic periods in China used his ''Shiji'' as the official format for historical texts, as well as for biographical literature. Saint Augustine was influential in Christian and Western Thought at the beginning of the Medieval period. Through the Medieval and Renaissance periods, history was often studied through a Sacred or religious perspective. Around 1800, German philosopher and historian Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel brought Philosophy and a more Secular approach in historical study. In the preface to his book the Muqaddimah , historian and early sociologist Ibn Khaldun warned of seven mistakes that he thought that historians regularly committed. In this criticism, he approached the past as strange and in need of interpretation. The originality of Ibn Khaldun was to claim that the cultural difference of another age must govern the evaluation of relevant historical material, to distinguish the principles according to which it might be possible to attempt the evaluation, and lastly, to feel the need for experience, in addition to rational principles, in order to assess a culture of the past. Other historians of note who have advanced the historical methods of study include Leopold Von Ranke , Lewis Bernstein Namier , Geoffrey Rudolph Elton , G.M. Trevelyan and A.J.P. Taylor . In the 20th century, historians focused less on epic nationalistic narratives, which often tended to glorify the nation or individuals, to more realistic chronologies. French historians introduced quantitative history, using broad data to track the lives of typical individuals, and were prominent in the establishment of Cultural History (cf. Histoire Des Mentalités ). American historians, motivated by the civil rights era, focused on formerly overlooked ethnic, racial, and socio-economic groups. In recent years, Postmodernists have challenged the validity and need for the study of history on the basis that all history is based on the personal interpretation of sources. In his book ''In Defence of History'', Richard J. Evans , a professor of modern history at Cambridge University , defended the worth of history. SEE ALSO
Lists
Methods and tools
Other
Particular studies and fields These are approaches to history; not listed are histories of other fields, such as History Of Science , History Of Mathematics and History Of Philosophy .
Related disciplines
NOTES AND REFERENCES FURTHER READING
EXTERNAL LINKS ;Further reading
;General Information
|
|
|