Information AboutEthos |
| CATEGORIES ABOUT ETHOS | |
| rhetoric | |
| greek loanwords | |
|
Ethos () (''plurals:'' ''ethe'', ''ethea'') is a Greek word originally meaning "accustomed place" (as in "the habitat of horses", '' Il. '' 6.511) "custom, habit" that can be translated into English in different ways. Some possibilities are 'starting point', 'to appear', 'disposition' and from there, 'character'. From the same Greek root originates the word ''ethikos'' (), meaning "moral, showing moral character", loaned into late Latin as ''ethicus'', the feminine of which (''ethica'', for "moral philosophy"), via Old French ''ethique'', Middle English ''ethik'', is the origin of the modern English word '' Ethics ''. In Rhetoric , ''ethos'' is one of the three artistic proofs (''pistis'') Modes Of Persuasion (other principles being '' Logos '' and '' Pathos '') discussed by Aristotle in ' Rhetoric ' as a component of argument. It is also used to describe the ancient Greek belief that whatever music you listened to affected your character and personality. At first speakers must establish ''ethos''. On the one hand, this can mean merely "moral competence", but Aristotle broadens this word to encompass expertise and knowledge. He expressedly remarks that ''ethos'' should be achieved only by what the speaker says, not by what people think of his character before he begins to speak. This position is often disputed and other writers on rhetoric state that ''ethos'' is connected to the overall moral character and history of the speaker. (cf Isocrates ). There are three categories of ethos, which, if followed in the situation of speaking, could help develop a high ethos:
It is important to notice that Ethos does not belong to the speaker, but to the audience. So if you are the speaker your audience determines whether you are a high or a low-ethos speaker. Violations of ethos can entail some of the following:
It should be noted that dismissing an argument based on any of the above violations of ethos is a Formal Fallacy , rendering the dismissal of the argument invalid. The term "source crediblity" has been used as the construct examined in the social sciences. Though recent work has found support for the existence of the three dimensions identified above, work from the 1950s through the 1980s consistently revealed two dimensions (competence and character) with other dimensions such as dynamism found only when broad approaches equating crediblity with "person perception" were taken. REFERENCES
SEE ALSO |
|
|