| Current Controversies Regarding The Presbyterian Church Usa |
Article Index for Current |
Shopping Presbyterian |
Website Links For Current |
Information AboutCurrent Controversies Regarding The Presbyterian Church Usa |
|
DIVESTMENT The church stated in 1971 (UPCUSA) and 1976 (PCUS) that it has a responsibility to ensure that its funds (such as the Pension Trust for Retired Church Workers) be invested responsibly and consistent with the church's mission. The reunited church formed the Committee for Mission Responsibility Through Investing (MRTI) in 1986. The MRTI Committee carried out the General Assembly's wish to engage in regime in South Africa . As of 2007, the PC(USA) has divested itself from nineteen companies involved in military-related production ( Large Contractors , manufacturers of Anti-personnel Landmines and Weapons Of Mass Destruction ), tobacco companies, and companies engaged in or supporting governments in human rights violations. In the latter category, the church most recently divested itself from Talisman Energy , which was accused of collaboration with the Sudanese government. After Talisman withdrew from Sudan, the General Assembly voted to remove it from the divestment list. http://www.pcusa.org/mrti/pdf/07divestmentlist.pdf EARLY COMMUNICATIONS WITH ISRAEL In March 2002, General Assembly Clerk Clifton Kilpatrick sent a letter to Israeli prime minister Ariel Sharon stating in part, "While we do not condone the acts of violence by certain Palestinian extremists, we are appalled that Israel, in response, has continued to punish the entire Palestinian population and its leaders who have been your government's partners in the peace process." 1 2004 GENERAL ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION In June of 2004, the PC(USA) General Assembly met in , regardless of its location, and opposed the United States government making monetary contribution to the construction. In separate votes, the General Assembly also adopted policies rejecting Christian Zionism as being incompatible with Presbyterian theology on the grounds of it being an offshoot of Premillennial Dispensationalism http://www.pcusa.org/ga216/business/overtures/ovt0434.htm. CRITICISM OF RESOLUTION Together, the resolutions caused dissent within the church and some friction with the Jewish community. Leaders of several American Jewish groups communicated to the church their concerns about the use of economic leverages that apply specifically to companies operating in Israel. 3 A small handful of critics of the divestment policy accused church leaders of anti-Semitism. 45 6 COMPANIES NAMED FOR DIVESTMENT In 2005, the Committee on Mission Responsibility Through Investment named five companies for initial focus and that it would engage in "progressive engagement" with the companies' management. The five companies, all based in the United States, were the following: Caterpillar Inc. , Citigroup , ITT Industries , Motorola and United Technologies http://www.pcusa.org/mrti/profiles.htm. GENERAL ASSEMBLY COUNCIL RESPONSE TO CRITICISM In response, the PC(USA) General Assembly Council claimed that the PCUSA has "approved numerous resolutions on Israel and Palestine, repeatedly affirming, clearly and unequivocally, Israelis right to exist within permanent, recognized, and 'secure' borders."http://www.pcusa.org/worldwide/israelpalestine/israelpalestineresolution.htm The PC(USA) was not founded until 1983, but its predecessor denominations, the UPCUSA ("Northern" church) and PCUS ("Southern" church) made several official statements on ths issue. The Northern church recognized Israel's right to exist occurred in 1948, when the General Assembly declared that "We believe that a solution to the problem will be achieved only by a return to the principle of faithful devotion to the welfare, needs, and rights of both the Jewish and Arab peoples." It reiterated this viewpoint more strongly in its official policy statement of 1974. Both the PCUS and UPCUSA expressed their official support of the two-state solution in 1978 in response to the ", which is a controversial issue. http://index.pcusa.org/NXT/gateway.dll/socialpolicy/chapter00005.htm/section00011.htm/sub-section00034.htm?vid=default7 8 9Resolutions endorsing a Palestinian right of return also passed the PC(USA) General Assembly in 2003 and 2004. 10 A former Moderator of the General Assembly, Dr. Fahed Abu-Akel, has long endorsed a Palestinian "right of return."11 CHANGE TO POLICY IN 2006 In June 2006, The Presbyterian Church (USA) 217th General Assembly overwhelmingly (483-28) replaced language adopted in 2004 that focused the "phased, selective divestment" specifically on companies working in Israel. The new resolution requires the consideration of "practical realities," a "commitment to positive outcomes" and an awareness of the potential impact of strategies on "both the Israeli and Palestinian economies." The 2006 resolution also recognized Israel’s right to build a security barrier along its pre-1967 boundaries. The General Assembly acknowledged the "hurt and misunderstanding among many members of the Jewish community and within our Presbyterian communion" that resulted from the 2004 resolution and stated that the Assembly was "grieved by the pain that this has caused, accept responsibility for the flaws in our process, and ask for a new season of mutual understanding and dialogue." 1213 REACTION TO CHANGE IN POLICIES After the 2006 Presbyterian Church (USA) General Assembly in Birmingham , advocacy groups on differing sides of the Israel-Palestine issue praised the resolution. Groups supporting the Israelis, who had written General Assembly commissioners to express their concerns about a corporate engagement/divestment strategy focused on Israel, 14 praised the new resolution, saying that it reflected the church stepping back from a policy that singled out companies working in Israel. 15 Groups supporting the Palestinians said that the church maintained the opportunity to engage and potentially divest from companies that support the Israeli occupation, because such support would be considered inappropriate according to the customary MRTI process. REFERENCES |
|
|