| Carriers Case |
Article Index for Carriers |
Website Links For Carriers |
Information AboutCarriers Case |
| CATEGORIES ABOUT CARRIERS CASE | |
| 1473 in law | |
| english case law | |
| landmark cases | |
| property law | |
|
REFERENCES The Carriers case a lot more complex than this. The Carrier had an agreement with a foreign merchant to carry bales to Southampton. (The carrier can also be called the bailee as he is the person in possession of the goods) The merchant (also known as the bailor) had royal safe conduct covering his goods. This means, that if the goods were stolen, they would not be given to the Crown by the use of a waif. This happened in medieval times when a good was stolen. When the stolen goods were found, they became property of the King. The carrier broke open the bails and took the contents. The good came into the hands of the sheriff of London who gave the good to the King by waif. The merchant sued for the goods saying that the goods were not stolen and that the carrier had temporary property rights over them and therefore the goods cannot be given to the king. The sheriffs defence was that the carrier had committed a felony and therefore the goods were forfeit to the king. Despite the fact that the carrier had temporary possession of the goods with permission of the merchant, he had 'broken bulk'. i.e. he had broken up the bails and then sold them. the fact that he broke bulk shows the intention to commit felony. he was therefore guilty and hence the goods were forfeited to the king. however, due to the royal safe conduct that the merchant had, he got his goods back anyway. see also: manifest criminality FURTHER READING |
|
|