| British Airways Cross Controversy |
Article Index for British Airways |
Website Links For British |
Information AboutBritish Airways Cross Controversy |
| CATEGORIES ABOUT BRITISH AIRWAYS CROSS CONTROVERSY | |
| christianity-related controversies | |
| criticism of religion | |
| religion and politics | |
| christianity in the united kingdom | |
| secularism | |
| british airways | |
|
In October 2006, Nadia Eweida, a Christian employee of British Airways, was asked to cover up a Necklace which depicted a Christian Cross , and was placed on unpaid leave when she refused either to do so or to accept a position where she did not have to cover it up. Eweida planned to sue the airline for Religious Discrimination . Christian groups accused British Airways of double standards, as Sikh and Muslim employees are not prevented from wearing religious garments at work, since these are impractical to cover up. 1 Eweida lost an initial appeal to her employers on 20 November , but publicly stated she would continue to dispute BA's policy, and that she wished to wear the cross to Manifest her religion.2 The National Secular Society declared it sensible for staff handling baggage to be prohibited from wearing jewellery over their uniforms, suggested that Eweida was trying to Evangelise in the workplace3 and said that BA should have the right to insist that its uniform is neutral.45 BA announced a partial climb-down on November 25 , announcing a review of its uniform policy which could allow the wearing of a lapel badge. This followed pressure from the Archbishop of Canterbury who disclosed that the issue had been raised with the Church Commissioners, who look after Anglicans' financial interests.6 The following day Eweida declared that this compromise was unacceptable to her.7 On November 28 , Prime Minister Tony Blair publicly stated that in his view the issue was not worth BA fighting and that it would be best for the airline "just to do the sensible thing": i.e. allow the cross to be worn.89 On January 19 2007 BA announced that they would in future allow employees to wear a symbol of faith "openly" on a lapel pin, "with some flexibility ... to wear a symbol of faith on a chain". {Link without Title} {Link without Title} REFERENCES EXTERNAL LINKS |
|
|