Information AboutWeb 2.0 |
| CATEGORIES ABOUT WEB 2.0 | |
| branding | |
| buzzwords | |
| world wide web | |
| web services | |
| web 2.0branding | |
| buzzwords | |
| world wide web | |
| web services | |
| web 2.0 | |
| centralized computing | |
| world wide web | |
| websites | |
| buzzwords | |
Some technology experts, notably Tim Berners-Lee , have questioned whether one can use the term in a meaningful way, since many of the technology components of "Web 2.0" have existed since the early days of the Web. DEFINING WEB 2.0 As used by its supporters, the phrase "Web 2.0" can also refer to one or more of the following:
Earlier users of the phrase "Web 2.0" employed it as a synonym for " Semantic Web ". The combination of Social-networking systems such as FOAF and XFN with the development of Tag-based Folksonomies , delivered through Blog s and Wiki s, sets up a basis for a semantic web environment. Tim O'Reilly regards Web 2.0 as Business embracing the web as a platform and utilising its strengths (global audiences, for example). O'Reilly considers that Eric Schmidt 's abridged slogan, ''don't fight the Internet'', encompasses the essence of Web 2.0 — building applications and Services around the unique features of the Internet , as opposed to building applications and expecting the Internet to suit as a platform (effectively "fighting the Internet"). , 2005 ) sums up the Meme s of Web 2.0, with example-sites and services attached.]] In the opening talk of the First Web 2.0 Conference , Tim O'Reilly and John Battelle summarized what they saw as key principles of Web 2.0 applications:
Level 3 applications, the most "Web 2.0"-oriented, which could only exist on the Internet, deriving their power from the human connections and network effects that Web 2.0 makes possible, and growing in effectiveness the more people use them. O'Reilly gave as examples: eBay, craigslist, Wikipedia, del.icio.us, Skype, dodgeball and Adsense. Level 2 applications, which can operate offline but which gain advantages from going online. O'Reilly cited Flickr , which benefits from its shared photo-database and from its community-generated tag database. Level 1 applications, also available offline but which gain features online. O'Reilly pointed to Writely (now part of Google Docs & Spreadsheets ) and iTunes (because of its music-store portion). Level 0 applications, which would work as well offline. O'Reilly gave the examples of MapQuest, Yahoo! Local and Google Maps. Mapping-applications using contributions from users to advantage can rank as "level 2". Non-web applications like email, instant-messaging clients and the telephone. CHARACTERISTICS OF "WEB 2.0" While interested parties continue to debate the definition of a Web 2.0 application, a Web 2.0 '''website''' may exhibit some basic common characteristics. These might include:
The impossibility of excluding group-members who don’t contribute to the provision of goods from sharing profits gives rise to the possibility that rational members will prefer to withhold their contribution of effort and Free-ride on the contribution of others. Marwell and Ames, 1979 http://www.jstor.org/view/00029602/dm992648/99p05365/0 "Free riding is taking place at Web 2.0": http://www.trendsspotting.com/blog/?p=1
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|