Socialist Workers Party (britain) Article Index for
Socialist Workers
Website Links For
Socialist Workers
 

Information About

Socialist Workers Party (britain)




  Party Articletitle Socialist Workers Party (UK)
  Party Logo
  Leader Collective leadership ( Central Committee )
  Foundation 1950 / 1977
  Ideology Revolutionary Socialism
  Position Far Left
  International International Socialist Tendency
  European European Anticapitalist Left
  Europarl ''none''
  Colours Red , White , Black
  Headquarters London


The Socialist Workers Party (SWP) is a political party of the Far Left in England

It sees itself as standing in the , Socialist Worker , 26 August 2006. To that end, the Socialist Workers Party in Scotland now constitute part of the new electoral coalition, Solidarity .

The SWP has an industrial department, which co-ordinates its work within the working class movement and a Student section, named the Socialist Workers' Student Society which has groups at numerous universities. It participates in a number of United Front s, most notably the Stop The War Coalition . On the international level it leads the Trotskyist organisation the International Socialist Tendency .


PUBLICATIONS

The SWP publishes a weekly newspaper '' Socialist Worker '', a monthly magazine, '' Socialist Review '' , and a quarterly theoretical journal, '' International Socialism ''. In addition it publishes an international bulletin and an internal bulletin ''Party Notes'', various pamphlets and books (often through its publishing house, Bookmarks), and with others its publishes a number of rank-and-file newspapers, such as ''Post Worker'' Post Worker , for specific industries.


LEADERSHIP

The leadership is formed by a central committee of around 10, and a national committee. Elections to the central committee are held yearly at the national conference. , 14 January 2006.

The national committee consists of 50 members elected annually at national conference. At least four party councils a year are to be arranged by the central committee. At these councils 2 delegates elected from each branch plus the national committee will be entitled to attend. Post conference bulletin , Socialist workers party, January 2006

Other prominent members include: John Molyneux , Paul McGarr , Michael Lavalette , John Rose , Ian Birchall , Mike Gonzalez , Pat Stack and Mark Steel .


HISTORY

See Also: History of the Socialist Workers Party (Britain)



The Socialist Review Group

The origins of the SWP lie in the formation of the Socialist Review Group (SRG) which held its founding conference in 1951 History of the International Socialists – Part 1: From Theory to Practice , Ian H. Birchall, (originally published in) 's analysis of Russia as a bureaucratic state capitalist regime and were expelled from the Revolutionary Communist Party . Three documents formed the theoretical basis of the group: The Nature of Stalinist Russia The Nature of Stalinist Russia , The Class Nature of the People's Democracies The Class Nature of the People's Democracies and Marxism and the Theory of Bureaucratic Collectivism Marxism and the Theory of Bureaucratic Collectivism . [http://www.marxists.org.uk/archive/higgins/1997/locust/chap03.htm]

The tiny size of the group meant that they adopted a position of working in the . Of the 33 members at the first recorded meeting, 19 were in the LLY {Link without Title} .

Through campaigning within the Campaign For Nuclear Disarmament and the new Labour Party youth movement the Young Socialists the Socialist Review Group was able to recruit among a new generation of activists and by 1964 had a membership of 200. {Link without Title} .


''Labour Worker'' and International Socialism Group

The paper ''Industrial Worker'' was created in 1961, and was quickly renamed ''Labour Worker'' before evolving into ''Socialist Worker''. ''Socialist Review'' was reduced in size and then scrapped The Socialist Review Group became the International Socialism Group (IS) at the end of 1962 [http://www.marxists.org.uk/archive/cliff/works/2000/wtw/ch03.htm .

With the Labour Party in power, and many Labour members becoming disillusioned, IS started doing more work that was external to the Labour Party. After 1967, few IS members were active in that party. In 1965, an article in ''Labour Worker'' said "Obviously Marxists should take those positions which give access to the direct workers’ organisations. But in the wards and GMCs the practice of buying the right to discuss politics by over-fulfilling the canvassing norms, should cease or be reduced to the minimum." {Link without Title} .

It marked a turn to more of a focus on work in the trade unions, and a key part of this process was the pamphlet published in 1966: ''Incomes policy, legislation and shop stewards'', which opposed the Labour Party's Incomes Policy and discussed how it could be fought. Incomes policy, legislation and shop stewards

1968 saw the IS heavily involved in the Vietnam Solidarity Campaign and large numbers of student struggles from which it recruited As a result the IS grew from 400 to 1,000 members but also suffered many splits [http://www.marxists.org.uk/archive/cliff/works/2000/wtw/ch04.htm .

The early 1970s saw the creation of rank and file newspapers and a general turn to industry, including setting up factory branches During the 1972 miners strike, ''Socialist Worker'' was taken and sold by miners [http://www.marxists.org.uk/archive/higgins/1997/locust/chap11.htm . Between March 1972 and March 1974, the membership of IS increased from 2,351 to 3,310, and also recruited a large number of manual workers into membership.[http://www.marxists.org.uk/archive/higgins/1997/locust/chap11.htm]


Labour in power, the SWP formed

In 1974 Labour returned to power. A key part of their struggle was to introduce the Social Contract which sought to introduce a voluntary incomes policy. It was backed by left wing union leaders such as Hugh Scanlon and Jack Jones . This period also saw an increase in the number of full time union convenors and these factors along with an increase in unemployment have been blamed by Tony Cliff and the SWP for a drastic fall in union militancyA World to Win, Tony Cliff , Chapter 6. In 1974 the IS was ambitious and optimisticCliff, pg 132 expecting to double the number of factory branches over the year. In practice they declined swiftly from 38 in 1974 to only three or four by 1976. When the firefighters went on strike in 1977 against the Social Contract the IS was unable to deliver any significant solidarity. The national rank and file movement fell apart. In 1976 the SWP decided to stand in parliamentary By-elections but the results were very poor and the original idea of standing in 60 seats at the next election was droppedCliff, page 142.

In January 1977 IS was renamed the Socialist Workers Party. This decision was a result of the move to stand in elections along with a perception that: "IS’s ability to initiate activity, rather than simply join in movements launched by others, had never been greater. Industrially, there were more members than ever able to lead disputes in their own workplaces" http://www.marxists.de/intsoctend/birchall/crisis.htm. According to Martin Shaw this occurred with no real discussion within the organisationhttp://www.martinshaw.org/is.htm and Jim Higgins has claimed "Its founding was for purely internal reasons, to give the members a sense of progress, the better to conceal the fact that there had actually been a retreat" {Link without Title} .


Anti-Nazi League and Rock against Racism

Another campaign to which the SWP was central at this time was the Anti-Nazi League . The National Front had grown in the 1970s, and by 1976 they had polled 15,340 votes in Leicester and large votes elsewhere. They were even more visible on the streets through graffiti, racist attacks and street protests. A key turning point came when, on August 13, 1977, thousands of Anti-fascist s, including large numbers of local black youths, prevented the NF from marching through Lewisham. This was to lead to the creation of the ANL as an initiative between the SWP and sections of the Labour Left. It also received support from other Trotskyist groups and the Communist Party.

In response to Eric Clapton 's public support for Enoch Powell , Rock Against Racism was set up in close collaboration with the ANL, and a series of successful carnivals were organised. Some of the bands involved with Rock Against Racism were The Clash (as seen in the film '' Rude Boy ''), The Buzzcocks , Steel Pulse , X-Ray Spex , The Ruts , Generation X and the Tom Robinson Band . By 1981 the NF was in retreat and had split, and the campaign was wound up. {Link without Title}


The "downturn"

From 1978 Tony Cliff became convinced by some of his comrades that the period of rising militancy had come to an endCliff, Chapter 7 {Link without Title} and a downturn had begun. Cliff writes that: "The crisis in the organisation went on for about 3 years, 1976-79". By 1982 the SWP was refocused completely on a propagandist approach, with geographical branches as the main unit of the party, a focus on Marxist theory and an abandonment of perspective of building a rank and file movement. The rank and file organisations were wound down as was the women's organisation "Women's Voice" and the paper for ethnic minorities "Flame". The closure of Women's voice in particular was bitterly disputedsee Chapter 10 of Sex, Class and Socialism by Lindsey German for more on this, a sharp debate taking place between those who believed the result would be to ignore the specificities of women's oppression, and those who believed that feminist theories were in danger of losing contact with the united interests of men and women workers.

During the 1984-85 Miners Strike the SWP's propaganda concentrated on the need for solidarity and explaining why this was not happening. Cliff described the approach as one of concrete propaganda - "It had to answer the question 'What slogan fits the issue the workers are fighting over?'"Cliff, chapter 6.

This change in outlook and methods was viewed by many on the left as being a retreat into sectarianism by the SWPsee for example, Where is the SWP going? by Murray Smith of the Scottish Socialist Party but this change in methods is credited by the SWP as allowing it to survive a very hostile period with substantial numbers of party members [http://pubs.socialistreviewindex.org.uk/isj97/rees.htm . In contrast Murray Smith described it as "jumping from one campaign to the next and hostility towards the rest of the left" [http://pubs.socialistreviewindex.org.uk/isj97/smith.htm].


The 1990s

The early 1990s for many of the far left was a period of demoralisation and disorientation due to the collapse of the Soviet Union. However for the SWP this was seen as a vindication of their long held analysis that the Soviet Union was a state capitalist society. They believe that "the transition from state capitalism to multinational capitalism is neither a step forward nor a step backwards, but a step sidewards. The change only involves a shift from one form of exploitation to another form for the working class as a whole", Harman, The Storm Breaks, ISJ 2:46.

The SWP were involved in the campaign against the , the successor to the NF and campaigned against the Criminal Justice Bill (with the memorable slogan of "Kill the Bill").

In 1997, despite being highly opposed to Tony Blair 's policies, they called for a vote for the Labour Party, with the belief that there would rapidly be a crisis of expectations in Labour which would lead New Labour voters to question their allegiances and open up opportunities and space for organisation and activity to the left of Labour that are traditionally occupied by Labour when it is in opposition. John Rees wrote in July 1997: "In the mid-term the 'sado-monetarist' strategy followed by the Labour government will clash increasingly sharply with a working class movement which has drawn hope and confidence from its electoral victory over the Tories." {Link without Title} .


Recent Activity

More recent work is influenced by the SWP's analysis of a "current revival in consciousness and combativity, discernible from the mid-1990s and unmistakable since the Seattle demonstration in 1999." {Link without Title} . Recent activity has seen the SWP involved with the , and in England and Wales involvement in the Socialist Alliance has been succeeded by involvement in Respect .

On a campaigning front the SWP has been heavily involved in the anti-war movement through the Stop The War Coalition (StWC) - Lindsey German is convenor of StWC. The SWP has also been involved in the Anti-globalization movement, which it believes is more accurately described as the 'anti-capitalist' movement, mostly through the Globalise Resistance organisation and the World Social Forum and European Social Forum .

The SWP organises Marxism, a five day 'long weekend' of meetings and events held in central London each July since 1977 {Link without Title} . It is the largest annual event held by any far-left group in Britain, and one of the largest of its kind in Europe.


Role in the Tommy Sheridan Defamation case

(cf. Sheridan V News International ))

The SWP joined the Scottish Socialist Party as a platform in 2001. In November 2004, Pat Smith, a member of the SW Platform and SSP EC member attended an emergency meeting to discuss allegations in tabloid newspapers about Tommy Sheridan's personal life.
Sheridan took the News of the World to Court for defamation in Summer 2006. The SWP supported Sheridan, against the opinion of most of the SSP leadership.
In the aftermath of the trial, the SW platform left the Scottish Socialist Party together with the Committee For A Workers International , Tommy Sheridan and Rosemary Byrne to set up a new party called Solidarity .


THEORY

- the main Trotskyist grouping.

Because it sees itself as and the founding Congress of the Fourth International of Leon Trotsky in 1938 .

Its supporters often refer to their beliefs as 'socialism from below', a term which has been attributed to groups, particularly both from Reformist parties, such as (the Labour Party ) and from various forms of what they disparagingly term ' Stalinism '—forms of socialism usually associated with the former Soviet Bloc and the old Communist Parties. These are seen as advocating socialism from above. In contrast Cliff argued: "The heart of Marxism is that the emancipation of the working class is the act of the working class. The Communist Manifesto states: ''All previous historical movements were movements of minorities, or in the interest of minorities. The proletarian movement is the self-conscious, independent movement of the immense majority, in the interest of the immense majority.''" For more on this see ''Marxism at the Millennium'' (2000) [http://www.marxists.org/archive/cliff/works/2000/millennium/index.htm

The SWP also seeks to differentiate itself from other Trotskyist tendencies. Three key theories are at the centre of its difference from other Trotskyists: State Capitalism, Deflected Permanent Revolution and The Permanent Arms Economy (see below for more details).

Unlike most Troskyist organisations, the SWP does not have a formal Program (see for example the Transitional Program ) but an outline of the SWP's ideas called "Where We Stand" {Link without Title} is published in Socialist Worker every week.


State Capitalism

The SWP maintains an opposition to what it terms 'substitutionist strategies'. This is the idea that social forces other than the Proletariat , which is for Marxists the potentially social revolutionary class due to its 'radical chains', may substitute for the proletariat in the struggle for a socialist society (see above). This idea led the founder of the SWP, Tony Cliff , to reject the idea that the USSR was a Degenerated Workers' State , the position held by other Trotskyists and derived from Leon Trotsky's analysis in the 1930's. Cliff was to argue that in fact the USSR was a form of capitalism which he referred to as bureaucratic State Capitalist and also argued was the case in Eastern Europe and later in other countries ruled by what he termed Stalinist parties such as China , Vietnam and Cuba . Cliff's approach to this idea was published in the 1948 article ''The Nature of Stalinist Russia'' {Link without Title}

Other IS/SWP theoreticians such as 's 1948 manifesto, ''Neither Wall Street nor the Kremlin''. Cliff's version of the theory of state capitalism must also be differentiated from those associated with other dissident Trotskyists and Left Communists , such as CLR James and Raya Dunayevskaya .


Deflected Permanent Revolution

As a Trotskyist tendency, the SRG/IS was faced with developing an explanation as to why and how a number of countries in the former colonial world had succeeded in overthrowing the rule of various imperial powers and forming states characterised by the SRG/IS as being bureaucratic state capitalist. In part, such an explanation was needed to understand why these colonial revolutions had not developed into uninterrupted or Permanent Revolution s, as predicted by Leon Trotsky in his theory of the same name. Taking Trotsky's theory as his starting point, Tony Cliff developed his own theory of ' Deflected Permanent Revolution '. He argued that where a revolutionary working class did not exist, the intelligentsia could, in certain limited circumstances, take the leadership of the nation and lead a successful revolution in the direction of a state capitalist solution. The outcome of such a revolution would be deflected from the goal of a social revolution as envisaged in Trotsky's original work.

Cliff's essay ''Permanent Revolution'' was first published in International Socialism Journal, No. 12 Spring 1963 in response to the Cuban Revolution and largely took it and the earlier Chinese Revolution as its subject. However the general concept of a deflected permanent revolution would be much exercised as a key analytical tool by IS theoreticians in the coming years. Most notable in this respect is the work of Nigel Harris in relation to India and later of Mike Gonzalez on Cuba[http://www.marxists.de/statecap/cuba/80-cucas.htm and Nicaragua. Most recently the theory has been given a central place in Cem Uzun's work Making the Turkish Revolution.


The permanent arms economy

State capitalism and deflected permanent revolution came to be seen as central to a distinct IS politics by the mid-1960's along with the theory of the Permanent Arms Economy (PAE). This theory sought to explain the Long Boom in the global economy afer the Second World War. This boom was in contrast to the period after the First World war where there was a period of stagnation.

The three theories taken together are often seen as being the hallmarks of the IS tradition, although this is contested by some former leaders of the IS, including Nigel Harris and Michael Kidron both of whom worked on the PAE and now repudiate it, and by some other Trotskyists outside the IS Tradition. The PAE, the most contested of the three theories, is also the only one that did not originate with Tony Cliff.

The PAE originated with a member of Max Shachtman's Workers' Party/International Socialist League named Ed Sard in 1944. Sard, writing as Walter J. Oakes, argued in ''Politics'' that the PAE was to be understood as allowing capitalism to achieve a level of stability by preventing the rate of profit from falling as spending on arms was unproductive and would not lead to the increase of the organic composition of capital. Later in 1951 in ''New International'', this time writing as T. N. Vance, Sard argued that the PAE operated through its ability to apply J. M. Keynes multiplier effect. Although briefly mentioned by Duncan Hallas in a ''Socialist Review'' of 1952 the theory was only introduced to the IS by Cliff in 1957. {Link without Title}

In his May 1957 article ''Perspectives of the Permanent War Economy'' Cliff offered the PAE to readers in a version derived from Sard's earlier essays but without reference to Keynes and using a Marxist theoretical framework. This was the only attempt to develop the idea, which it is suggested explains the long post war boom, until the publication of Mike Kidron's ''Western Capitalism Since the War''[http://www.marxists.org.uk/archive/kidron/works/1970/westcap/index.htm in 1968. Kidron would further develop the theory in his Capitalism and Theory. Additional work was also contributed by Nigel Harris and later by Chris Harman. However it should also be noted that Mike Kidron was to repudiate the theory as early as the mid-1970s in his ''Two Insights Don't make a Theory'' in International Socialism No 100. This was followed by a rejoinder from Chris Harman (''Better a valid insight than a wrong theory'')[http://www.marxists.de/theory/harman/insight.htm . Since this time the PAE has assumed less importance within IS theory, as the long boom which it seeks to explain recedes into history.


PRACTICE

Certain ways of working have also become part of the SWP tradition and groups linked to it in other countries. Accessible and actively-sold publications are central to the SWP way of working. This includes a quarterly theoretical journal which aims at being accessible to most activists. This contrasts with the very academic publications produced by many Trotskyist groups around the world.

Secondly, an extremely open way of recruitment - the SWP is extremely easy to join. Many people who join do not stay long, but the party considers that this is the best way to test people's interest and determination, rather than going through some sort of "apprenticeship" as other revolutionary goups have been known to set up (for example Lutte Ouvrière in France. Along the same lines, the SWP has never gone in for pseudonyms, "party names" etc, as have sections of the Fourth International.

Thirdly, permanent factions are not permitted by the SWP constitution. Factions may be formed around any issue in the few months before a party conference, but the party conference decides the issue and the factions may not continue after the conference. This contrasts with Fourth International organizations such as the LCR in France, where permanent factions are very present in party life. Some commentators defend the idea of permanent factions as a sign of healthy debate and democracy. Others consider that permanent factions can only lead to paralysis in party activity, and a tendency to avoid key decisions.


CRITICISM

The SWP has been criticised by some in the collective). These criticisms were echoed by some within the Anti-war movement. The SWP, for its part, tends to promote the view that reliance on direct action by small groups is elitist, and instead favours mass mobilisations, strikes, and the most militant mass action that can be achieved at any given time.See e.g. Socialist Review, November 2002 )

The SWP has been accused of being overly accommodating to the allegedly reactionary concerns of some practising , The Observer , Sunday May 7, 2006.

For its part the SWP denies these accusations; it argues that it supports abortion rights and campaigns against the lowering of time limits for abortion Abortion rights , Farah Reza, '', 26 November 2005.

The SWP has also caused controversy by supporting the elements of the , 29 July 2006.

The when the USA 'intervened', forces it to ally with anti-socialist groupings for the sake of opposing a "common enemy". {Link without Title}

There has also been criticism and debate in, around and outside the party about its perceived failure to intervene or be a visible part of many United Front movements; some commentators criticising it as Sectarian . Nevertheless the SWP has, for example, started campaigning on climate change in the past decade and is involved heavily in united fronts such as the Stop The War Coalition and Unite Against Fascism , and has been involved in many such fronts in the past, most notably the Anti-Nazi League . However, this strategy in turn has been criticised by others who see the SWP as using these alliances Opportunistically or as Front Organisation s.

Members of other socialist political parties often claim that the SWP is undemocratic. {Link without Title} However, this is fiercely countered, and the SWP has an annual conference with its central (using a slate system) and the national committee elected by delegates, as well as policies for the next year being proposed and voted on with alternatives offered to some proposals.

The Scottish Socialist Party is also critical of the Socialist Workers Party , which was formerly a platform within it, for the role that it played in the Sheridan Libel Case , and the subsequent split to form Solidarity, accusing them of unprincipled opportunism. [http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/regions/scotland/2006/07/344793.html]. The SWP have responded to such allegations by suggesting that the ''Personality is Political'' [http://www.socialistworker.co.uk/article.php?article_id=9565]

Some accuse the SWP of being and Workers Power argue that their position of winning reforms through the Respect Coalition is reformist, and therefore makes the SWP a centrist, rather than revolutionary party.


NOTABLE MEMBERS


Current



Former (including former members of the IS)



Deceased (including deceased ex-members)



SEE ALSO



NOTES




EXTERNAL LINKS


SWP pages



Non-SWP pages