| Rus' (people) |
Website Links For Rus |
Information AboutRus' (people) |
|
The origin of the name is matter of considerable dispute. In general, the hypothesis of E. Kunik and ,the coastal areas of Uppland province in Sweden. The Danish scholar T.E. Karsten has pointed out that the territory now occupying by the areas of Uppland, Sodermanland and East Gotland in ancient times were known as ''Rođer'' or ''rođin''. Thomson accodingly has suggested that ''Rođer'' has probably been derived from ''rođsmenn'' or ''rođskarlar'', meaning seafarers or rowers. However, it is also suggested that the name Rus originates from the Iranian name of Volga River (by F.Knauer Moscow 1901), as well as from the Rosh of Ezekiel . Prof George Vernadsky has suggested that the name derives from the Roxolani or from the Aryan term ''ronsa'' (moisture, water), the recurrence of river names like Ros in Eastern Europe.The Russian Primary Chronicle: Laurentian Text Translated by O. P. Sherbowitz-Wetzor ISBN 0910956340 KEY SOURCES Slavic sources According to the earliest East Slavic record, the Primary Chronicle , the Rus' was a group of Varangian s among others like Swedes and Gotlanders who lived on the other side of the Baltic Sea , in Scandinavia and as far as the land of the English and the French. The Varangians were first expelled, then invited to rule the warring Slavic and Finnic tribes of Novgorod : Later, the Primary Chronicle tells us, they conquered Kiev and created the state of Kievan Rus' (which, as most historians agree, was preceded by the Rus' Khaganate ). The territory they conquered was named after them as were, eventually, the local people (see Etymology Of Rus And Derivatives for further details). Islamic sources ), these were tentatively identified with the "tribal centres" at Kiev , Novgorod and Tmutarakan . The Muslim traveller, Ibn Fadlan , who visited Volga Bulgaria in 922 , described the Rus (''Rusiyyah'') in the terms strongly suggestive of the Norsemen: Apart from Ibn Fadlan's account, the Normanist theory draws heavily on the evidence of the Persia n traveler Ibn Rustah who allegedly visited Novgorod (or Tmutarakan , according to George Vernadsky ) and described how the Rus' exploited the Slavs. In Ibn Khordadbeh 's account, the Rus are described as "a kind of the Saqaliba ", a term usually used to refer to Slavs, and anti-Normanist scholars have interpreted this passage as indicative of the Rus being Slavs rather than Scandinavians. In the interpretation of the Normanist scholars, the word Saqaliba was also frequently applied to all fair-haired, ruddy-complexioned population of Central, Eastern, and Northeastern Europe, indicating that the Muslim authors did not distinguish sharply between the Slavs and the Rus. Greek sources When the Varangians first appeared in refers to the Ros as Δρομΐται, a word related to the Greek word meaning "a run", suggesting the Mobility Of Their Movement By Waterways . In his treatise '' De Administrando Imperio '', Constantine VII describes the Rhos as the neighbours of Pechenegs who buy from the latter cows, horses, and sheep "because neither of these animals may be found in Rosia". His description represents the Rus as a warlike northern tribe. Constantine also enumerates the names of the Dniepr cataracts in both ''Rhos'' and in ''Slavic'' languages. The Rhos names have distinct Germanic etymology:
Western European sources The first Western European source to mention the Rus is the Annals Of Saint Bertan which relate that Emperor Louis The Pious ' court in Ingelheim , 839 (the same year as the first appearance of Varangian s in Constantinople ), was visited by a delegation from the Byzantine Emperor . In this delegation there were two men who called themselves Rhos (''Rhos vocari dicebant''). Louis enquired about their origins and learnt that they were Swedes . Fearing that they were spies for their brothers, the Danes , he incarcerated them. Subsequently, in the 10th and 11th centuries, Latin sources routinely confused the Rus with the extinct East Germanic tribe of Rugians . Olga Of Kiev , for instance, was designated in one manuscript as a Rugian queen (''regina Rugorum''). NORMANIST THEORY The "Normanist" theory suggests that Kievan Rus' may have been named after its Scandinavian ruling elite, much as was the case with Normandy . The proponents of this theory claim that the name ''Rus'', like the Finnish name for Sweden , is derived from an Old Norse term for "the men who row" (''rods-'') as rowing was the main method of navigating the Russian rivers, and that it is linked to the Swedish coastal area of Roslagen (Rus-law) or ''Roden'', from where the Varangian s came from according to the Russian Primary Chronicle . The Russian Primary Chronicle: Laurentian Text Translated by O. P . Sherbowitz-Wetzor ISBN 0910956340 The name ''Rus'' would then have the same origin as the Finnish and Estonian names for Sweden: Ruotsi http://fi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruotsi and '''Rootsi'''. http://et.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rootsi It has been suggested that the Vikings had some enduring influence in Rus, as testified by loan words, such as ''yabeda'' "complaining person" (from ''aembaetti'' "office"), ''skot'' "cattle" (from ''skattr'' "tax") and (Helgi), Olga (Helga) and Igor (Ingvar). The Normanist theory was first elaborated by the German historian Gerhardt Friedrich Müller (1705-1783), who was invited to work in the Russian Academy Of Sciences in 1748 . At the beginning of his notorious speech from 1749 , Müller declared that the "glorious Scandinavians conquered all the Russian lands with their victorious arms". As the rest of the speech represented a lengthy list of Russian defeats by the Germans and Swedes, Müller was forced to curtail his lecture by shouts from the audience. The scathing criticism from Lomonosov , Krasheninnikov , and other academicians led to Müller being forced to suspend his work on the issue until Lomonosov's death. Although the printed text of the original lecture was destroyed, Miller managed to rework it and had it reprinted as ''Origines Rossicae'' in 1768 . Other notable proponents of the "Normanist theory" of the Russian state — including Nikolai Karamzin (1766–1826) and his disciple Mikhail Pogodin (1800–75) — gave credit to the claims of the Primary Chronicle that the Varangians were invited by East Slavs to rule over them and bring order. The theory was not without political implications. In Karamzin's writing the Normanist theory formed the basis and justification for Russian autocracy (as opposed to anarchy of the pre-Rurikid period), and Pogodin used the theory to advance his view that Russia was immune to social upheavals and revolutions, because the Russian state originated from a voluntary treaty between the people of Novgorod and Varangian rulers. ANTINORMANIST THEORIES Starting with Lomonosov , scholars from Eastern Europe have criticised the Normanist theory. During the imperial period, Karamzin's and Pogodin's official views were disputed by the more liberal sectors of Russian society and by some Polish historians. In the early 20th century, the traditional anti-Normanist doctrine (as articulated by Dmitry Ilovaisky ) seemed to have lost currency. However, the Normanist rhetoric was abused by Goebbels during the Soviet-German War and, in the eyes of the Soviet authorities, the theory was discredited forever. The war over, the anti-Normanist arguments were revived and adopted in official Soviet historiography. Mikhail Artamonov ranks among those who attempted to reconcile both theories by hypothesizing that the Kievan state united the southern Rus (of Slavic stock) and the northern Rus (of Germanic stock) into a single nation. The staunchest advocate of the anti-Normanist views in the post-WWII period was Boris Rybakov , who argued that the cultural level of the Varangians could not have warranted an invitation from the culturally advanced Slavs. This conclusion leads Slavicists to deny or reinterpret the Primary Chronicle, which claims that the Varangian Rus' were "invited". Rybakov assumes that Nestor , putative author of the Chronicle, was biased against the pro-Greek party of Vladimir Monomakh and supported the pro-Scandinavian party of the ruling prince Svyatopolk . He cites Nestor's factual inaccuracies as pro-Scandinavian manipulations and compares his account of Rurik's invitation with numerous similar stories found in folklore around the world. Quite a few alternative, non-Normanist origins for the word ''Rus'' have been postulated by Sigismund Von Herberstein , Ilovaisky, Rybakov, and others, although none was endorsed in the academic mainstream:
According to F. Donald Logan (''The Vikings in History'', cit. Montgomery, p. 24), "in 839 , the Rus' were Swedes . In 1043 , the Rus' were Slavs ." The Scandinavians were completely absorbed and, unlike their brethren in England and in Normandy , they left little cultural heritage in Eastern Europe. This almost complete absence of cultural traces (besides several names, as discussed above, and arguably the ''veche'' -system of Novgorod , comparable to ''thing'' in Scandinavia), is remarkable, and the Slavicists therefore call the Viking s "''cultural chameleons''", who came, ruled and then disappeared, leaving little cultural trace in Eastern Europe. This seems to suggest that these Rus' were a small group, less than a people in the nation sense of the word; less than an Ethnos . NOTES REFERENCES AND FURTHER READING
EXTERNAL LINKS |
|
|