Normative Economics Article Index for
Normative
Website Links For
Normative
 

Information About

Normative Economics




It is common to distinguish normative economics ("what ought to be" economic matters ) from Positive Economics ("what is"). But many normative (value) judgments are held conditionally, to be given up if facts or knowledge of facts changes, so that a change of values may be purely scientific (Sen, 1970, p, 61). This undermines the common distinction (Wong, 1987, p. 923). But Sen distinguishes ''basic (normative) judgments'', which do not depend on such knowledge, from ''nonbasic'' judgments, which do. He finds it interesting to note that "no judgments are demonstrably basic" while some value judgments may be shown to be nonbasic. This leaves open the possibility of fruitful scientific discussion of value judgments (Sen, 1970, pp. 63-64).

SEE ALSO



REFERENCES

  • Milton Friedman (1953). " The Methodology Of Positive Economics ," ''Essays in Positive Economics''

  • '', v. 4, pp. 792-93

  • Daniel M. Hausman and Michael S. McPherson (1996). ''Economic Analysis and Moral Philosophy'', Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Phillipe Mongin (2002). "Is There Progress in Normative Economics?" , same title in Stephan Boehm, et al., eds., ''Is There Progress in Economics?''

  • Amartya K. Sen (1970), ''Collective Choice and Social Welfare''. "5.3 Basic and Nonbasic Judgments" & "5.4 Facts and Values," pp. 59-64.

  • Stanley Wong (1987). “positive economics," The ''New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics'', v. 3, pp. 920-21.