| Nsa Call Database |
Article Index for Nsa |
Website Links For Nsa |
Information AboutNsa Call Database |
These records do not include audio information or transcripts of the content of the phone calls. The database's existence has prompted fierce objections from those who view it as a warrantless or illegal search and a violation of the Pen Register provisions of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act and (in some cases) the Fourth Amendment Of The United States Constitution . The George W. Bush Administration has neither confirmed nor denied the existence of the domestic call record database. This contrasts with a related NSA controversy concerning Warrantless Surveillance Of Selected Telephone Calls ; in that case they did confirm the existence of the program of debated legality. LAW SUIT The Electronic Frontier Foundation filed a related suit against AT&T on 31 January 2006 , alleging that the firm had given NSA access to its database, a charge reiterated in the USA Today article. {Link without Title} Verizon and BellSouth have both claimed they were never contacted by the NSA, nor did they provide any information to the agency, Verizon says it isn't giving call records to NSA though US codes of lawTITLE 15, CHAPTER 2B, § 78m (b)(3)(A) permit companies to lie about their activities when the President believes that telling the truth would compromise national security.[http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode15/usc_sec_15_00000078---m000-.html#b_3_A] INTERNET MONITORING On May 22, 2006, it was revealed by investigative reporter Seymour Hersh and Wired Magazine that the program involved the NSA setting up Splitters to the routing cores of many telecoms companies and to major Internet traffic hubs. These provided a direct connection via an alledged "black Room" known as Room 641A . This room allows most U.S. telecoms communications and Internet traffic to be redirected to the NSA. The NSA used them to eavesdrop and order police investigations of tens of thousands of ordinary Americans without judicial warrants. According to a security consultant who worked on the program, "What the companies are doing is worse than turning over records ... they’re providing total access to all the data", and a former senior intelligence official said, "This is not about getting a cardboard box of monthly phone bills in alphabetical order ... the N.S.A. is getting real-time actionable intelligence." 23 On June 30, 2006 USA Today printed a partial retraction about its controversial article the prior month saying: "... USA TODAY also spoke again with the sources who had originally provided information about the scope and contents of the domestic calls database. All said the published report accurately reflected their knowledge and understanding of the NSA program, but none could document a contractual relationship between BellSouth or Verizon and the NSA, or that the companies turned over bulk calling records to the NSA. Based on its reporting after the May 11 article, USA TODAY has now concluded that while the NSA has built a massive domestic calls record database involving the domestic call records of telecommunications companies, the newspaper cannot confirm that BellSouth or Verizon contracted with the NSA to provide bulk calling records to that database ..." 4 DENIALS |
|
|