| Mothers Against Drunk Driving |
Article Index for Mothers Against |
Website Links For Mothers Against Drunk Driving |
Information AboutMothers Against Drunk Driving |
| CATEGORIES ABOUT MOTHERS AGAINST DRUNK DRIVING | |
| alcohol | |
| drunk driving | |
| non-profit organizations | |
|
Mothers Against Drunk Driving, or '''MADD''', is a Single-issue non-profit Victims' Rights organization in the United States and other countries. MADD is headquartered in the Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex suburb of Irving, Texas . In the 1980s , MADD had success in changing public attitudes and laws regarding Driving Under The Influence (DUI). Generally the group favors:
HISTORY Candy Lightner was the organizer and founding president of Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD). In 1980 , Ms. Lightner’s 13-year-old daughter, Cari, was killed by a drunken hit-and-run driver as she walked down a suburban street in California. "I promised myself on the day of Cari’s death that I would fight to make this needless homicide count for something positive in the years ahead," Candy Lightner later wrote. A 1983 television movie about Lightner resulted in publicity for the group, which grew rapidly. In the early 1980s, the group managed to attract attention from the federal law that required states to raise the minimum legal age for purchase and possession (but not the Drinking Age ) to 21 or lose federal highway funding. After the United States Supreme Court upheld the law in the 1987 case of '' South Dakota V. Dole '', every state capitulated. In 1988 , a drunk driver traveling the wrong way on Interstate 71 in Kentucky caused a head-on collision with a School Bus . 27 people died and dozens more were injured in the ensuing fire. The Carrollton Bus Disaster in 1988 was one of the worst in U.S. history. In the aftermath, several parents of the victims became actively involved in MADD, and one became its national president. In 1990 , MADD introduced its "20 by 2000" plan to reduce the proportion of traffic fatalities that are alcohol-related 20 percent by the year 2000. This goal was accomplished three years early, in 1997 . http://www.madd.org/home/ That same year, MADD Canada was founded. MADD Canada: Learn More In 1991 , MADD released its first "Rating the States" report, grading the states in their progress against drunk driving. "Rating the States" has been released four times since then. In 1999 , MADD’s National Board of Directors unanimously voted to change the organization’s mission statement to include the prevention of underage drinking. Why has MADD changed its mission statement? In a November s), new technology in smart cars, law enforcement, and grass roots activism. MADD Announces National Campaign to Eliminate Drunk Driving MADD Online Press Release; November 20, 2006 ACTIVITIES AND IMPACT Drunk driving laws Since the group's inception, thousands of anti-drunk driving laws have been passed. http://www.madd.org/home/ MADD also helped popularize the use of Designated Driver s, although at first it opposed the practice because it might enable non-drivers to consume more. http://www.madd.org/home/ More recently, MADD was heavily involved in lobbying to reduce the legal limit for Blood Alcohol from BAC .10 to BAC .08. . http://www.madd.org/home/ In 2000 , this standard was passed by Congress and by 2005 , every state had an illegal .08 BAC limit.. http://www.madd.org/home/ MADD Canada has recently called for a maximum legal BAC of .05.See MADD Canada Although many MADD leaders have supported a lower limit," http://www.activistcash.com/organization_quotes.cfm/oid/17 Mothers Against Drunk Driving ," ActivistCash.com MADD U.S. has not yet officially called called for a legal limit of .05. Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD) supports legislation setting the illegal blood alcohol content (BAC) limit for adult drivers who have been previously convicted of DUI/DWI at .05 per se. This lower BAC limit shall apply to these offenders for a period of five years from date of conviction and they shall be required to provide a breath test if requested by an officer following a legal traffic stop. {Link without Title} MADD has successfully advocated, and continues to advocate, for the enactment of laws for even more strict and severe punishment of offenders of laws against driving under the influence, as well as laws against drinking and driving.. http://www.madd.org/home/ Declines in drunk driving deaths The death rate from alcohol-related traffic accidents has declined since the 1980s. According to statistics from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) " Total Traffic Fatalities vs. Alcohol Related Traffic Fatalities - 1982-2005 ," MADD Online; load date: ''November 17, 2006'', alcohol related deaths per year have declined from 26,173 in 1982 to 16,885 in 2005. MADD has argued that the group's efforts have brought about this decrease, because it claims that alcohol-related fatalities declined more than did non-alcohol-related fatalities.. http://www.madd.org/home/ However, NHTSA's definition of "alcohol-related" deaths includes all deaths on U.S. highways involving drunk drivers, drunk victims, or both. In 2001, for example, the NHTSA's Fatality Analysis Reporting System estimated an annual total of 17,448 alcohol-related deaths. As a 2002 Los Angeles Times article noted, the NHTSA estimates for that year attributed only about 5,000 of those deaths to a drunk driver causing the death of a sober driver, passenger, or pedestrian (Vartabedian 2002). It should also be noted that vehicle safety has been improved since the 1980s, and this has likely resulted in a decrease in all auto fatalities, including alcohol-related deaths. In 1999 the Government Accountability Office (GAO) reviewed the NHTSA figures widely cited by MADD and concluded that they "raised methodological concerns calling their conclusions into question". The statistics, the GAO report said, "fall short of providing conclusive evidence that .08% BAC laws were, by themselves, responsible for reductions in alcohol related fatalities." {Link without Title} Minimum drinking age laws MADD argues that, given that the brain does not stop developing until the early 20s, alcohol consumption retards brain development and harms the parts of the brain responsible for judgment and memory.. http://www.madd.org/home/ MADD also frequently cites NHTSA data as proof that a high drinking age has saved 22,798 lives since 1975 by reducing the number of fatalities involving underage drinking drivers.. http://www.madd.org/home/ However, evidence of harm to brain development is based on studies of have dropped by a similar proportion, despite the fact that Canada's drinking age remains at 18 or 19 depending on the province. Operating hours and availability of alcohol MADD has generally taken the position that a decrease in the availability of alcohol will lead to a decrease in consumption, and therefore a decrease in drunk driving. However, a study concluded, "these findings indicate that county-level prohibition is not necessarily effective in improving highway safety".Schulte Gary SL, Aultman-Hall L, McCourt M, Stamatiadis N. Consideration of driver home county prohibition and alcohol-related vehicle crashes ''Accident Analysis and Prevention'' 2003 Sep;35(5):641-8. Empirical research has also revealed that later closing hours are generally associated with lower alcohol-related traffic crashes and fatalities (Halstead, R. Novato woman testifies at state hearing. ''Marin Independent Journal'', April 20, 2004; Gordon, A. Young drivers go to pot. ''Toronto Star'', February 10, 2006; Later sales don't increase crashes, DWI arrests. Associated Press, March 1, 2005; Reilly, S. & Snider, J. Drinking five or more drinks in a day. ''USA Today'', May 21, 2004) CRITICISMS Candy Lightner's departure By 1985, many MADD leaders were calling for the criminalization of all driving after drinking any amount of alcoholic beverage. Ms. Lightner disagreed with this aim and said that police ought to be concentrating their resources on arresting drunk drivers, not those drivers who happen to have been drinking. Due to this dispute, she left the organization in 1985 and has since gone on to criticize the group as " Neo-prohibitionist ."Dresty, John. Neo-prohibition: law of the land. ''The Hofstra Chronicle'', May 12, 2005 (http://www.hofstrachronicle.com/news/2005/05/12/EditorialopEd/NeoProhibitionism-951960.shtml+Dresty+Neo-prohibitionism&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us) Lightner stated that MADD "has become far more neo-prohibitionist than I had ever wanted or envisioned … I didnt start MADD to deal with alcohol. I started MADD to deal with the issue of drunk driving"Bresnahan, S. MADD struggles to remain relevant. ''Washington Times'' Metropolitan edition), August 6, 2002, B1-2 (http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-90152301.html). Under-21 drinking Retired sociologist David J. Hanson questions the effectiveness and relevance of MADD's insistence that minors should not drink alcohol. Hanson argues such policies possibly Encourage underage and reckless drinking, since current public policy produces a supervision paradox where it can be difficult to assist and educate younger people in making responsible judgments about alcohol consumption; he compares the behavior of American youth to their European counterparts, who live in a society with "more liberal" consumption laws. Government Attacks Drinking with Junk Science by David J. Hanson, Ph.D. and Matt Walcoff Also, he believes that it encourages some younger people to drink, to show their contempt for a law they feel is unjust, since in most other countries, 18-year olds, and even younger people, can consume alcohol legally, and that it would be safer to have them drinking legally in supervised environments. According to Hanson, "research on the drinking age has not been able to verify a cause-and-effect relationship between the law and alcohol use or abuse." Hanson further notes, "Many studies show no relationship between the two variables while others report that some alcohol-related fatalities have shifted from the 18-20 age group to the 21-24 age group. When it comes to the effects of the drinking age, the most we can say is that the jury is still out." Civil liberty aspects Radley Balko , a Libertarian writer, talks about the possible social implications of some of MADD's policies. He writes, "In its eight-point plan to 'jump-start the stalled war on drunk driving,' MADD advocates the use of highly publicized but random roadblocks to find drivers who have been drinking. Even setting aside the civil liberties implications, these checkpoints do little to get dangerous drunks off the road. Rather, they instill fear in people who have a glass of wine with dinner, a beer at a ballgame or a toast at a retirement party." Others point to numerous extensive studies, i.e., from Australia and Tennessee, which indicate that consistent use of sobriety checkpoints over time result in significant decreases in the instances of impaired driving. Adherents of checkpoints emphasize that their major purpose is not to catch impaired drivers but is to sensitize motorists to the fact that law enforcement is actively enforcing the laws regarding impaired driving. In addition, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that the slight inconvenience to motorists is acceptable in light of the positive effect of such law enforcement efforts. Efficacy of MADD's proposals Breath alcohol ignition interlock devices See Also: Breath alcohol ignition interlock device Additionally MADD has proposed that Breath Alcohol Ignition Interlock Device s should be installed in all new cars." MADD: Device key to keep drinkers off road " by Tom Incantalupo Tom Incantalupo wrote "Ultimately, the group said yesterday, it wants so-called alcohol interlock devices factory-installed in all new cars. "The main reason why people continue to drive drunk today is because they can," MADD president Glynn Birch said at a news teleconference yesterday from Washington, D.C." Sarah Longwell, a spokeswoman for the American Beverage Institute responded to MADD's desire to legislate breathalyzers into every vehicle in America by stating "This interlock campaign is not about eliminating drunk driving, it is about eliminating all moderate drinking prior to driving. The 40 million Americans who drink and drive responsibly should be outraged." She also points out that "Many states have laws that set the presumptive level of intoxication at .05% and you can't adjust your interlock depending on which state you're driving in. Moreover, once you factor in liability issues and sharing vehicles with underage drivers you have pushed the preset limit down to about .02%. It will be a ''de facto'' zero tolerance policy." " MADD Interlock Campaign Targets Responsible Social Drinkers Some point out that the policy assumes that citizens are guilty of drunkenness and requires them to prove themselves innocent not only before they drive but repeatedly while they drive. {Link without Title} A serious concern is that the devices might actually increase crashes. The "California Department of Motor Vehicle’s “An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Ignition Interlock in California” concluded that the devices “are not effective in reducing DUI convictions or incidents being imposed for first-time DUI offenders.” (The study did show, however, that the risk of crashing was higher for offenders with a lock installed—perhaps because they were being asked to conduct breath tests while driving.) If the locks have no effect when imposed after a first DUI conviction—which presumably selects for the most likely drunk drivers—what is the chance that they will have an effect if foisted upon millions of people who simply want a new car?" [http://www.thecrimson.com/article.aspx?ref=515945] This concern may be allayed by the introduction of passive sensors installed in steering wheels. Victim impact panels MADD promotes the use of victim impact panels (VIPs), in which judges require DWI offenders to hear victims or relatives of victims of drunk driving crashes relate their experiences. MADD received $3,749,000 in 2004 from VIPs; much of this income was voluntary donations by those attending as some states, such as California, do not allow a fee to be charged to offenders for non-legislative programs. Some states in the United States, such as Massachusetts, permit victims of all crimes, including drunk driving accidents, to give " study suggested that the VIPs tended to be perceived as confrontational by multiple offenders. Such offenders then had a higher incidence of future offenses." A Randomized Trial of Victim Impact Panels’ DWI Deterrence Effectiveness ," W. G. Woodall, H. Delaney, E. Rogers, & D. R. Wheeler; Center on Alcoholism, Substance Abuse, and Addictions (CASAA), University of New Mexico MADD's mission Some critics claim that MADD has shifted in emphasis from preventing DUI deaths and injuries to preventing underage alcohol use, and that this is undermining the organization's original goal, because MADD's leadership has stated that it's more important to stop drinking than it is to stop drunk driving fatalities. For example, the president of MADD, Glynn Byrch, wrote in a letter to the editor of the ''Washington Post'': :Taking away a teenager's car keys and replacing them with a beer may prevent death and injury on the road, but it sends a dangerous message to teenagers that it's okay to break the law." Addressing Life's Perilous Pleasures ," The Washington Post , ''Letters to the Editor'' section; Monday, August 15, 2005 In 2005, John McCardell, Jr. wrote in ''The New York Times'' that "the 21-year-old drinking age is bad social policy and terrible law" that has made the college drinking problem far worse. " What Your College President Didn't Tell You ," McCardell Jr., John M.; ''The New York Times''; op-ed section; September 13, 2004 Many who are otherwise sympathetic to MADD's cause feel the organization has gone too far. Balko argued in a December 2002 article that MADD's policies are becoming overbearing. "In fairness, MADD deserves credit for raising awareness of the dangers of driving while intoxicated. It was almost certainly MADD's dogged efforts to spark public debate that effected the drop in fatalities since 1980, when Candy Lightner founded the group after her daughter was killed by a drunk driver," Balko wrote. "But MADD is at heart a bureaucracy, a big one. It boasts an annual budget of $45 million, $12 million of which pays for salaries, pensions and benefits. Bureaucracies don't change easily, even when the problems they were created to address change."" Targeting the Social Drinker Is Just MADD ," Balko, Radley Blood alcohol content MADD's critics point out that the organization is focused entirely upon the ''presence'' of alcohol in the body, rather than upon the actual danger posed by any ''impairment''. The original drunk driving laws addressed the danger by making it a criminal offense to drive a vehicle while impaired — that is, while "under the influence of alcohol"; the amount of alcohol in the body was simply evidence of that impairment. With MADD's significant influence, however, all 50 states have now passed laws making it a criminal offense to drive with a designated level of alcohol, regardless of whether the driver is impaired or not. MADD then successfully lobbied to lower that original level of .10% down to .08%, and are actively working to lower it even further. Conflict of interest criticism Balko criticizes MADD for not demanding higher excise taxes on the distilled spirits industry, even as it demands beer producers pay higher excise taxes. "Interestingly," Balko writes, "MADD refrains from calling for an added tax on distilled spirits, an industry that the organization has partnered with on various drunk driving awareness projects. And MADD has made no secret of its desire to lower the legal blood- alcohol level from the current .08 in most places to .06, .04 or even to zero. This despite studies showing that most alcohol-caused traffic fatalities involved drivers with a level of 0.14 or higher." The average blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of convicted drunk drivers in California is .16%. The tendency historically has been for the average convictee's BAC to be double the legal limit. Ergo, the lower the legal limit, the lower the overall alcohol level in drivers who drink before driving. High fundraising costs In 1994, ''Money'' magazine reported that telemarketers raised over $38 million for MADD, keeping nearly half of it in fees. This relationship no longer exists. Overall, MADD reports that it spends 17% of its budget on fundraising, which is below average for an advocacy organization that is heavily dependent on many individual contributions. However, the rates MADD as needing improvement. Charity Navigator Rating - Mothers Against Drunk Driving . In December 2006 in Canada , the '' Toronto Star '' reported that "Mothers Against Drunk Driving Canada has such high costs that only about 19 cents of every dollar goes to victim services and the fight against drunk driving", with the organization claiming their fundraising calls were also educating the public about drunk driving. "MADD rejects 'disgruntled' critics," ''Toronto Star'' No longer there As of December 13 2006, MADD Canada has suspended fundraising efforts pending an internal financial investigation "MADD suspends fundraising," ''Toronto Star'' No longer there MADD's opinion of opponents of sobriety checkpoints MADD writes, that “opponents of sobriety checkpoints tend to be those who drink and drive frequently and are concerned about being caught”. MADD Online: Sobriety Checkpoints: Facts & Myths IN POPULAR CULTURE
MADD PRESIDENTS
SEE ALSO REFERENCES
EXTERNAL LINKS |
|
|