Mercury Mountaineer Article Index for
Mercury
Website Links For
Mercury
 

Information About

Mercury Mountaineer




  name Mercury Mountaineer
  manufacturer Ford Motor Company
  layout Front Engine , Rear-wheel Drive / Four-wheel Drive
  class Mid-size Luxury SUV
  body Style 4-door SUV
  assembly Louisville, Kentucky <br> St Louis, Missouri
  production 1997-present
  similar Buick Rainier <br> Chrysler Aspen



Automobile Information

  name First generation
  production 1997-2001
  engine 40&nbspL '' Cologne '' V6 <br>50&nbspL V8
  transmission 4-speed Automatic <br>5-speed automatic
  wheelbase 1116 in
  width 702 in
  length 1901 in
  height 705 in
  related Ford Explorer <br> Ford Ranger <br> Mazda B-Series



Automobile Information

  name Second generation
  production 2002-present
  engine 40&nbspL '' Cologne '' V6 <br>46&nbspL '' Modular '' V8
  transmission 5-speed automatic
  wheelbase 1137 in
  width 721 in
  length 1907 in
  height 696 in
  related Ford Explorer <br> Lincoln Aviator


The Mercury Mountaineer is a near- coming in at $1,000–$6,000 more than the Explorer. Forbes, 2000 Mountaineer review It was mildly redesigned for the 2006 model year due to a new frame, but looks very similar to its previous model.


FIRST GENERATION (1997-2001)

Although the redesigned Explorer had already been out for 2 years, Mercury introduced an Explorer twin called the Mountaineer. The Mountaineer was only slightly different from the Explorer, although it did offer a few extra luxury features that the Explorer lacked, such as a standard 5.0 L 210 hp Windsor V8. First year sales for the Mountaineer did not meet Mercury's expectations. For 1998, so customers could differentiate the Mountaineer from the Explorer, the front fascia was flipped upside down, and the headlights were made smaller, while it got a new rear hatch and unique wheels. The new overhead-cam 4.0 L 205  Hp Cologne V6 with a 5-speed 5R55E Automatic was now the standard powerplant. Mountaineer sales sped up because of this, though they still lagged behind the Explorer.

In 2000, a huge punch came to the Mountaineer with the Firestone Vs Ford Motor Company Controversy , where a large amount of rollovers were happening involving Explorers and Mountaineers. While Ford blamed Firetone's faulty tires, which had problems with the tread separating, Firestone blamed Ford, claiming that the Explorer and Mountaineer were unsafe. The case was settled, and Car And Driver proved that a large amounts of the rollovers were caused by the drivers overracting to the tire blow out.


SECOND GENERATION (2002-2005)

For 2002, Ford redesigned the Explorer and Mountaineer. This Mountaineer was new from the ground up, offering even more luxury features than the last generation. This Mountaineer offered features like woodgrain trim, rear radio deck, and a rear-seat TV/DVD player. Sales sped up drastically with the introduction of this generation, and it was a look ahead at the entire revamp of the Mercury line, to offer more luxurious looks and features. Some design cues found on this Mountaineer, like the waterfall grille and barred taillights, would go on to form Mercury's new signature look, which would appear on all its models. Mercury Mountaineer has enjoyed one of the highest owner loyalty ratings of any SUV. It seems that when people buy a Mountaineer, the generally replace it with another one when the time comes. This speaks volumes about how happy Mountaineer custumers are with their vehicles.

For 2006, the facelift Mountaineer was heavily refreshed. The Mountaineer was mounted on a heavily revised frame, and it offered a more upscale interior, to make up for the cut Lincoln Aviator . This Mountaineer got new wheels and a DVD based navigation system, a feature not found on previous Mountaineers. The current generation of Mountaineers do not come with HID lighting.


FIRESTONE TIRE CONTROVERSY

See Also: Firestone vs Ford Motor Company controversy



In May 2000, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) contacted Ford and Firestone about the high incidence of tire failure on Mercury Mountaineers, Ford Explorers, and Mazda Navajos fitted with Firestone tires. Ford investigated and found that several models of 15 in (381 mm) Firestone tires (''ATX'', ''ATX II'', and ''Wilderness AT'') had very high failure rates, especially those made at Firestone's Decatur, Illinois plant.

The failures all involved ''tread separation''—the tread peeling off followed often by tire disintegration. If that happened, and the vehicle was running at speed, there was a high likelihood of the vehicle leaving the road and rolling over. Many rollovers cause serious injury and even death; it has been estimated that over 250 deaths and more than 3,000 serious injuries resulted from these failures.

Ford and Firestone have both blamed the other for the failures, which has led to the severing of relations between the two companies. Firestone has claimed that they have found no faults in design nor manufacture, and that failures have been caused by Ford's recommended tire pressure being too low and the vehicle's design. Ford, meanwhile, pointed out that tires manufactured by the Goodyear Tire And Rubber Company to the same specification had a spotless safety record when installed on the SUVs. Ford's conclusions were confirmed by NHTSA in their report into the tire failures, published in October 2001.

Many outside observers tend towards blaming both parties; Firestone's tires being prone to tread separation and failure, and the vehicles being especially prone to rolling over if a tire fails at speed compared to other vehicles. However, a subsequent NHTSA investigation of real world accident data showed that the SUVs were no more likely to roll over than any other SUV.

A Product Recall was announced, allowing Explorer, Mountaineer, and Navajo owners to change the affected tires for others.

A large number of lawsuits have been filed against both Ford and Firestone, some unsuccessful, some settled out of court, and a few successfully. Lawyers for the plaintiffs have argued that both Ford and Firestone knew of the dangers but did nothing, and that specifically Ford knew that the Explorer was highly prone to rollovers. Ford denied these allegations.

Car And Driver magazine tested a first-generation Explorer with a built-in Rollcage and a special device that would flatten the tire at the push of a button. The Explorer did not flip in any of the numerous tests, and that was mostly because the driver managed to stay calm. Everyday Explorer drivers taken by surprise by a tread separation or loss of tire pressure in high speed traffic situations may have panicked and swerved violently, resulting in a significant portion of reported rollovers.


AWARDS

  • Class Exclusive Roll Stability Control (RSC) System.

  • Consumers Digest Best Buy for 2006 and 2007.



CANADIAN MARKET

The Mountaineer was never sold in Canada . The Mountaineer's twin, the Ford Explorer, remains to be sold for the Canadian market. Its other twin, the Lincoln Aviator , was also sold for the Canadian market until its demise in 2005.


REFERENCES



EXTERNAL LINKS