Interpersonal Relationship Article Index for
Interpersonal
Website Links For
Interpersonal
 

Information About

Interpersonal Relationship




In Sociology and in Popular Culture , interpersonal relationships involve Social associations, connections, or Affiliation s between two or more people. These people may interact overtly or covertly; they may operate face-to-face or they may remain effectively unknown to each other — such as those in a Virtual Community who may maintain anonymity and not socialize together outside of a Chat Room .

Sometimes an observer can detect explicit interactions that define an interpersonal relationship — such as Body-language or Dialogue . Erving Goffman and his followers see any public appearance as a Ritual built from a "ceremonial idiom".
Christian Bromberger, « Paraître en public », (" To appear in public") ''.

Erving Goffman , (1967) '' Interaction Ritual '' p.56

Implicit interactions include standing in a shopping-line or in an emergency-room. Most actions consist of a mixture of both explicit and implicit interactions. An interpersonal interaction can constitute a social transaction, as in the form: "you scratch my back, I'll scratch yours". Some transactions facilitate further interaction between the participants and some constitute "show-stoppers". Interpersonal violence consist of action, interaction and transaction, which doesn't always terminate the relationship.

Context has great importance when meaningfully describing a particular interaction between people. Meaning itself results from interpersonal interactions, most significantly in the Developmental Stage of life with peers, parents and teachers. Socialization transmits Culture . Culture — in the light of Social Constructionism — forms how people construct their world and the relationships in it.

Analysts of interpersonal relationship may view a relationship as focused (such as the sales-oriented relationship between a sales assistant and a customer) or as '''unfocused'''' (as between passengers on a bus). People traveling to a football-match share a relationship whether they support the same team or opposing teams. The significance of the relationship may not become apparent until they cheer or boo. In each case culture will tend to define the forms of both accepted and unacceptable interactions.

Interpersonal relationships vary in their degree of Self-disclosure , Feedback , Power and respect — to name but a few aspects. They vary in the extent to which culture and language define or construct them. They vary in the degree to which people can question, challenge or change the relationship, which itself can demonstrate power-differentials in a variety of interpersonal relationships and settings.

Relationships vary in the degree to which Intimacy and sharing occur — implying the discovery or establishment of Common Ground . They may or may not center around things shared in common.

ld text'''


TYPES OF INTERPERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS


Examples of categories of personal relationships may include:




THEORIES

Social Psychology and related spheres propose several approaches to the subject of interpersonal relationships, among them:

  • Closure and Trust , as trust between parties can become Mutual . This may lead to enduring relationships.

  • Social Exchange Theory , which interprets relationships in terms of exchanged benefits. People will regard relationships in the light of the rewards of the relationship, as well as rewards they may potentially receive in alternate relationships.

  • Systemic Coaching , which analyzes relationships as expressions of a perceived human need to love and be loved. Transference s, entanglements and substitution can complicate relationships. Systemic coaching claims to offer solutions for many difficulties in relationships.

  • Equity Theory , which stems from a criticism of social exchange theory. Proponents argue that people care about more than just maximizing rewards: they also allegedly want fairness and equity in their relationships.

  • vs. connection, novelty vs. predictability, and Openness vs. closedness.

  • Attachment Styles , which analyze relationships in yet another way. Proponents of this view argue that attachment styles developed in childhood continue influential throughout adulthood, influencing the roles people adopt in relationships.

  • Socionics and some other theories of psychological Compatibility consider interpersonal relationships as at least partly dependent on the Psychological Types of partners.



REFERENCES




SEE ALSO