Information AboutHypothesis |
| CATEGORIES ABOUT HYPOTHESIS | |
| scientific method | |
|
A hypothesis (from Greek '''') consists either of a suggested explanation for a Phenomenon or of a reasoned proposal suggesting a possible correlation between multiple phenomena. The term derives from the Greek , ''hypotithenai'' meaning "to put under" or "to suppose." The Scientific Method requires that one can Test a '''scientific hypothesis'''. Scientists generally base such hypotheses on previous Observation s or on extensions of Scientific Theories . USAGE In early usage, scholars often referred to a clever idea or to a convenient mathematical approach that simplified cumbersome calculations as a ''hypothesis''; when used this way, the word did not necessarily have any specific meaning. as a reality, but merely as a hypothesis. In common usage in the 21st century, a ''hypothesis'' refers to a provisional idea whose merit needs evaluation. For proper evaluation, the framer of a hypothesis needs to define specifics in operational terms. A hypothesis requires more work by the researcher in order to either confirm or disprove it. In due course, a confirmed hypothesis may become part of a Theory or occasionally may grow to become a theory itself. Normally, scientific hypotheses have the form of a Mathematical Model . Sometimes, but not always, one can also formulate them as Existential Statements , stating that some particular instance of the phenomenon under examination has some characteristic and causal explanations, which have the general form of Universal Statements , stating that every instance of the phenomenon has a particular characteristic. Any useful hypothesis will enable Prediction s, by Reasoning (including Deductive Reasoning ). It might predict the outcome of an Experiment in a laboratory setting or the observation of a phenomenon in Nature . The prediction may also invoke statistics and only talk about probabilities. Karl Popper , following others, has argued that a hypothesis must be Falsifiable , and that a proposition or theory cannot be called scientific if it does not admit the possibility of being shown false. To meet this additional criterion, it must at least in principle be possible to make an observation that would disprove the proposition as false, even if one has not actually (yet) made that observation. A falsifiable hypothesis can greatly simplify the process of testing to determine whether the hypothesis has instances in which it is false.The Scientific Method is a process for experimentation that is used to answer questions and explore observations. It is essential in framing a hypothesis that the investigator does not currently know the outcome of a potentially falsifying test or that it remains reasonably under continuing investigation. Only in such cases does the experiment, test or study potentially increase the probability of showing the truth of a hypothesis. If the researcher already knows the outcome, it counts as a "consequence" — and the researcher should have already considered this while formulating the hypothesis. If one cannot assess the predictions by observation or by experience, the hypothesis classes as not yet useful, and must wait for others who might come afterward to make possible the needed observations. For example, a new technology or theory might make the necessary experiments feasible.The Scientific Method is a process for experimentation that is used to answer questions and explore observations.... Primary school science teachers in the United States have traditionally misdefined "hypothesis" as "an educated guess." This usage is unfortunate because it fails to convey the explanatory or predictive quality of scientific hypotheses. To say that a hypothesis is "an educated guess" is like saying a tricycle is a "vehicle with three." The definition omits the word's most important feature. Scientists do not offer hypotheses as purposeless guesses. Instead, scientific hypothesis are generated as early attempts to explain natural phenomena or to predict the outcomes of experiments. To be scientifically useful a hypothesis must be testable. It is correct to call the following statement a scientific hypothesis: "Identical twins often have different personalities because personality is influenced by genes and the environment." In contrast, the following educated guess is not a useful scientific hypothesis. "The reason John Quincy Adams was such a great President of the United States is that he learned from the victories and defeats of his father, President John Adams." The second statement addresses a social phenomenon, not a natural one. In addition, it is difficult to imagine how the statement could be tested. The ideal test is a comparison between John Quincy Adams' performance as President of the United States with and without having had the opportunity to learn from the experiences of his father. This comparison can not be performed, especially not today, since John Quincy Adams died in 1848. TYPES OF HYPOTHESIS A Proposition may take the form of asserting a Causal relationship (such as "A ''causes'' B"). A proposition often (but not necessarily) involves an assertion of causation. For example, if a particular Independent Variable changes, then a certain Dependent Variable also changes. This formulation, also known as an "If and Then" statement, applies whether or not a proposition asserts a direct cause-and-effect relationship. http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=8F37399C-E7F2-99DF-30361B86A598909B&chanID=sa007 An example of hypothetical reasoning - the formation of diamonds in zircon crystals A hypothesis about possible Correlation Does Not stipulate the cause and effect ''per se'', only stating that "A is related to B". Investigators may have more difficulty in verifying causal relationships than other correlations, because quite commonly ''intervening'' variables also become involved, possibly giving rise to the ''appearance'' of a possibly direct cause-and-effect relationship, but which (upon further investigation) turn out to have some other, more direct causal factor not mentioned in the proposition. Also, a mere observation of a change in one variable, when correlated with a change in another variable, can actually mistake the effect for the cause, and ''vice-versa'' (i.e., potentially get the hypothesized cause and effect backwards). Empirical hypotheses that experimenters have repeatedly verified may become sufficiently dependable that, at some point in time, they become considered as "proven". Some people may succumb to the temptation to term such hypotheses " Law s", but they would do so mistakenly, since by definition a hypothesis explains and a law describes (for example, a law can state: "Matter can neither be created or destroyed, only changed in form"). More accurately, one could refer to repeatedly verified hypotheses simply as "adequately verified", or as "dependable". Statistics features a rather more general concept of a hypothesis: this involves making assertions about the probability distributions or likelihoods of events. There are two kinds of hypothesis that are used. First, the null hypothesis or H0. The second is the alternative hypothesis or H1. To give the simplest non-trivial example, one might formulate two hypotheses about tossing a coin:
No finite sequence of results could utterly falsify either hypothesis. However various statistical approaches (such as Bayesian Statistics and Classical Statistics (i.e. T-test s)) can quantify the strong intuition that H1 appears much less likely than H0 if, in 1,000 tosses, 495 came out "Heads" — and much more likely if 895 came out "Heads". In more complex sciences, researchers generally evaluate experiments statistically rather than as simple verifications or falsifications. EVALUATING HYPOTHESES The Hypothetico-deductive Method demands Falsifiable hypotheses, framed in such a manner that the scientific community can prove them false (usually by Observation ). (Note that confirming (or failing to falsify) a hypothesis does not necessarily prove that hypothesis: the hypothesis remains provisional.) As an example: someone who enters a new country and observes only white sheep might form the hypothesis that all sheep in that country are white. It can be considered a hypothesis, as it is falsifiable. Anyone could falsify the hypothesis by observing a single black sheep. Provided that the experimental uncertainties are small (for example, provided that one can fairly reliably distinguish the observed black sheep from (say) a goat), and provided that the experimenter has correctly interpreted the statement of the hypothesis (for example, does the meaning of "sheep" include rams?), finding a black sheep falsifies the "white sheep only" hypothesis. However, failure to find non-white sheep could not be considered Proof that there were none. SCIENTIFIC HYPOTHESIS A trial solution to the problem is called the hypothesis. It is often called an "educated guess" because it is a sugested solution based on the evidence. Several hypothesis may be tested and rejected before the problem is solved. According to Schick and Vaughn (2002), researchers weighing up alternative hypotheses may take into consideration:
SEE ALSO
REFERENCES
EXTERNAL LINKS |
|
|