| Hieroglyphica |
Articles about Horapollo |
Information AboutHieroglyphica |
| CATEGORIES ABOUT HORAPOLLO | |
| symbolism | |
| ancient egyptians | |
| humanism | |
| byzantine culture | |
| manuscripts | |
| ancient writers | |
|
HORAPOLLO Horapollo is mentioned by the Suda (ω 159) as one of the last leaders of Ancient Egyptian priesthood, at a school in Menouthis , near Alexandria , during the reign of Zeno ( 474 – 491 AD). According to Susa, Horapollo had to flee because he was accused of plotting a revolt against the Christians , and his temple to Isis and Osiris was destroyed. Horapollo was later captured and after torture converted to Christianity. Another, earlier, Horapollo alluded to by the Suda was a grammarian from Phanebytis , under Theodosius II ( 408 – 450 AD). To this Horapollo the ''Hieroglyphica'' was attributed by most 16th century editors, although there were more occult opinions, identifying Horapollo with Horus himself, or a with a Pharaoh . HIEROGLYPHICA The text of the Hieroglyphica consists of two books, containing a total of 189 explanations of Egyptian Hieroglyphs . The text was discovered in 1422 on the island of Andros , and was taken to Florence by Cristoforo Buondelmonti (it is today kept at the Biblioteca Laurenziana, Plut. 69,27). By the end of the 15th century, the text became immensely popular among humanists, with a first printed edition of the text appearing in 1505 , initiating a long sequence of editions and translations. From the 18th century, the book's authenticity was called into question, but modern Egyptology regards at least the first book as based on real knowledge of hieroglyphs, although confused, and with baroque symbolism and theological speculation, and the book may well originate with the latest remnants of Egyptian priesthood of the 5th Century . This approach of symbolic speculation about hieroglyphs (many of which were originally simple Syllabic signs) was popular during Hellenism , whence the early Humanists, down to Athanasius Kirchner , inherited the preconception of the hieroglyphs as a magical, symbolic, ideographic script. The second part of book II treats animal symbolism and allegory, essentially derived from Aristotle , Aelian , Pliny and Artemidorus , and are probably an addition by the Greek translator. EDITIONS
SEE ALSO EXTERNAL LINKS
|
|
|