| European Court Of Justice |
Article Index for European Court |
Website Links For European Court |
Information AboutEuropean Court Of Justice |
|
The Court of Justice of the European Communities, usually called the '''European Court of Justice''' (ECJ), is the Highest Court in the European Union (EU). It has the ultimate say on matters of EU Law in order to ensure equal application across the various European Union Member States .1 The body was established in 1952 and is based in Luxembourg City — unlike most other Union Institutions which are Based In Brussels . The court is composed of one Judge per Member State although only 13 of them hear a case at any one time in the 'Grand Chamber'. The court is led by a president, since 2003 this has been Vassilios Skouris . The court is assisted by a lower court, the Court Of First Instance , dealing with certain issues. Two other courts deal with other responsibilities, the Civil Service Tribunal over employees of the Union's institutions and Court Of Auditors (an institution in its own right) over the Union's accounts.2 It should not be confused with the European Court Of Human Rights in Strasbourg , which is part of the Council Of Europe . HISTORY The court was established in 1952, by the Treaty Of Paris (1951) , for the European Coal And Steel Community . It was established with seven judges, considered an ideal number to allow for representation and an unequal number in case of a tie. One would be appointed from each member state and the seventh would be elected by representatives of the trade unions in the coal and steel industries. It became an institution when the Treaties Of Rome established the European Economic Community (EEC) and the European Atomic Energy Community (Euratom). Although all three communities were separate, under ''the Convention of 25 March 1957'' they shared some common institutions; these being the Parliamentary Assembly and the Court. It was with this that the Court of the ECSC became the Court of Justice of the European Communities.34 When in 1992 the Maastricht Treaty created the European Union , the name of the court did not change like the other institutions, with its powers primarily being over the European Community pillar of the union. However the 1957 convention was replaced when the Treaty Of Amsterdam outlined the court as an official and separate institution with its clear powers and responsibilities. It was already established as the official law court of the communities in 1988. OVERVIEW The ECJ is the Highest Court of the European Union in matters of Community Law , but not national law with each member having its own legal system. Its makes sure that EU-level legislation is interpreted and applied in the same manner across the whole of the EU. This is to avoid national courts interpreting the same legislation differently. Its decisions are binding, ensuring Member States , and Institutions follow the law. For example if a state fails to implement a Directive or the Commission acts outside its power. The court can also settle legal dispites between states, institutions, businesses and individuals. There is a court below the ECJ called the Court Of First Instance . It was created in 1989 and is attached to the Court of Justice. It gives rulings on certain cases, particarlu those brought by private individuals, companies and some organisations. It also deals with Competition Law . Attached to thise court is the Civil Service Tribunal . Set up in 2005, it deals with disputes between the EU and the European civil service. A number of high level judges have also called for a centralised EU court to deal with the Patent Law Of The European Union .5 ORGANISATION As of January 2007, the Court of Justice is made up of 27 Judges and 8 Advocates General. Should the Court so request, the Council of the European Union may, acting unanimously, increase the number of Advocates General. The Judges and Advocates General are appointed by common accord of the governments of the member states and hold office for a renewable term of six years. They are chosen from legal experts whose independence is 'beyond doubt' and who possess the qualifications required for appointment to the highest judicial offices in their respective countries or who are of recognised competence. Each member state of the European Union has the power to nominate one judge, so their number coincides most of the time with the number of member states. However, as the ECJ can only sit with an uneven number of judges, additional judges have been appointed at times when there was an even number of member states. The President of the Court of Justice is elected from among the judges every three years (renewable term). The president presides over hearings and deliberations, directing judicial business and administration (for example, the time table of the Court and Grand Chamber). He or she also assigns cases to the chambers for inquiries and appoints a judge as a rapporteur.6 The Council may also appoint Assistant Rapporteurs to assist the President in applications for the adoption of interim measures and to assist Judge-Rapporteurs in the performance of their duties. , the current President of the Court]] The court is assisted by eight ''advocates general'' who are responsible for presenting, with complete impartiality and independence, an ‘opinion’ in the cases assigned to them. They can question the parties involved and then give their opinion on a legal solution to the case before the judges deliberate and deliver their judgment. Officialy, the opinion given does not have to be followed by the Judges. Since 2003, advocates general are only required to give their opinion if the Court consideres the case raises a new point of law.8 5 of the 8 Advocates General are nominated as of right by the 5 big member states of the European Union: Germany , France , the United Kingdom , Italy and Spain . The other 3 positions rotate in alphabetical order between the 20 smaller member states; currently (2007), Slovenia , Slovakia and Portugal are thus represented. However, being only a little smaller than Spain, Poland has repeatedly requested a permanent Advocate General. It hopes to gain one in part of the deal on the Reform Treaty .9 Registry The Registrar is the Secretary General of the court. It manages departments under the authority of the Court's President. He or she also has same court duties as the registrar or Clerk of a national court and is appointed by the Court for a renewable term of six years. The Court may also appoint one or more Assistant Registrars. He or she helps the Court, the Chambers, the President and the Judges in all their official functions. He or she is responsible for the Registry as well as for the receipt, transmission and custody of documents and pleadings which have been entered in a register initialled by the President. He or she is Guardian of the Seals and is responsible for the Court's archives and publications. The Registrar is responsible for the administration of the Court, its financial management and its accounts, and he is helped by an administrator. The operation of the Court is in the hands of officials and other servants who are responsible to the Registrar under the authority of the President. The Court administers its own infrastructure; this includes the language service, which plays a particularly important role. CHAMBERS The Court of Justice may sit as a full Court, in a Grand Chamber (13 Judges), or in chambers of three or five Judges. It sits in a Grand Chamber when a Member State or a Community institution that is a party to the proceedings so requests, or in particularly complex or important cases. Other cases are heard by a chamber of three or five Judges. The Presidents of the chambers of five Judges are elected for three years, the Presidents of the chambers of three Judges for one year. The Court sits as a full Court in the very exceptional cases exhaustively provided for by the Treaty (for instance, where it must compulsorily retire the European Ombudsman or a Member of the European Commission who has failed to fulfil his obligations) and where the Court considers that a case is of exceptional importance. The Quorum for the full Court is 15. The court acts as a collegiate body: decisions are those of the court rather than of individual judges; no minority opinions are given and indeed the existence of a majority decision rather than unanimity is never suggested. JURISDICTION It is the responsibility of the Court of Justice to ensure that the law is observed in the interpretation and application of the Treaties Of The European Union and of the provisions laid down by the competent Community institutions. To enable it to carry out that task, the Court has wide jurisdiction to hear various types of action. The Court has competence, Inter Alia , to rule on applications for annulment or actions for failure to act brought by a Member State or an institution, actions against Member States for failure to fulfil obligations, References For A Preliminary Ruling and Appeals against decisions of the Court of First Instance. FORMS OF ACTION Actions for failure to fulfil obligations Such proceedings enable the Court of Justice to determine whether a Member State has fulfilled its obligations under Community law. The commencement of proceedings before the Court of Justice is preceded by a preliminary procedure conducted by the Commission, which gives the Member State the opportunity to reply to the Complaint s against it. If that procedure does not result in termination of the failure by the Member State, an action for breach of Community Law may be brought before the Court of Justice. That action may be brought by the Commission – as is practically always the case – or by another Member State. If the Court finds that an obligation has not been fulfilled, the Member State concerned must terminate the breach without delay. If, after new proceedings are initiated by the Commission, the Court of Justice finds that the Member State concerned has not complied with its judgement, it may, upon the request of the Commission, impose on the Member State a fixed or a periodic financial penalty. Actions for annulment By an Action For Annulment , the applicant seeks the annulment of a measure adopted by an institution (regulations, directives, decisions). An action for annulment may be brought by a Member State, by the Community institutions (Parliament, Council, Commission) or by individuals to whom a measure is addressed or which is of direct and individual concern to them. Actions for failure to act The Court of Justice and the Court of First Instance may also review the legality of a failure to act on the part of a Community institution. However, such an action may be brought only after the institution has been called on to act. Where the failure to act is held to be unlawful, it is for the institution concerned to put an end to the failure by appropriate measures. Application for compensation based on non contractual liability In applications for Compensation , based on Non-contractual Liability , the Court of First Instance rules on the liability of the Community for damage caused to citizens and to undertakings by its institutions or servants in the performance of their duties. Appeals on points of law Lastly, Appeal s on points of law only may be brought before the Court of Justice against judgements given by the Court of First Instance. If the appeal is admissible and well founded, the Court of Justice sets aside the judgement of the Court of First Instance. Where the state of the proceedings so permits, the Court may itself decide the case. Otherwise, the Court must refer the case back to the Court of First Instance, which is bound by the decision given on appeal. References for a preliminary ruling References for a preliminary ruling are specific to Community law. Whilst the Court of Justice is, by its very nature, the supreme guardian of Community legality, it is not the only judicial body empowered to apply Community law. That task also falls to national courts, in as much as they retain jurisdiction to review the administrative implementation of Community law, for which the authorities of the Member States are essentially responsible; many provisions of the Treaties and of secondary legislation - regulations, directives and decisions - directly confer individual rights on nationals of Member States, which national courts must uphold. National courts are thus by their nature the first guarantors of Community law. To ensure the effective and uniform application of Community legislation and to prevent divergent interpretations, national courts may, and sometimes must, turn to the Court of Justice and ask that it clarify a point concerning the interpretation of Community law, in order, for example, to ascertain whether their national legislation complies with that law. A reference for a preliminary ruling may also seek review of the legality of an act of Community law. The Court of Justice’s reply is not merely an opinion, but takes the form of a judgement or a reasoned order. The national court to which that is addressed is bound by the interpretation given. The Court’s judgement also binds other national courts before which a problem of the same nature is raised. References for a preliminary ruling also serve to enable any European citizen to seek clarification of the Community rules which concern him. Although such a reference may be made only by a national court, which alone has the power to decide that it is appropriate do so, all the parties involved – that is to say, the Member States, the parties in the proceedings before national courts and, in particular, the Commission – may take part in proceedings before the Court of Justice. In this way, a number of important principles of Community law have been laid down in preliminary rulings, sometimes in answer to questions referred by national courts of first instance. A 2005 study found that German , Belgian and Dutch judges made the most referrals for an interpretation of EU law to the ECJ. LEGACY See Also: List of notable European Court of Justice rulings The ECJ has made a number of notable decisions. Early on it ruled that European law took preccedence over national law, and in 2005 it extended this to Criminal Law .10 In 1995 with the Bosman Ruling court made it illegal for there to be a limit on the number of foreign (EU) players in a football team. It also gave more rights to players who wanted to switch clubs. This was because it resitricted the free movement of people across the EU. The affect of this ruling had a profound effect on the industry.11 In 2001 it ruled that parts of the German Constitution were illegal according to the EU's treaties and had to be amended. This realted to the ban on women participating in military combat.12 RELATIONSHIP WITH THE COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS The Court of Justice is separate from the European Court Of Human Rights . The latter is based in Strasbourg as part of the Council Of Europe . Since 1950, it has supervised compliance with the European Convention On Human Rights and thus functions as the highest European court for human rights and fundamental freedoms. All EU members are members of the Council of Europe and have signed the Convention on Human Rights. There are concerns about consistency in case law between the two courts. Hence the Court of Justice refers to the case-law of the Court of Human Rights and treats the Convention on Human Rights as thought it was part of the EU's legal system. Even though its members have joined, the EU as a whole has not. Hence EU institutions are not bound by it. However when the Reform Treaty is ratified, the EU is expected to sign the convention. This would make the Court of Justice bound by the Court of Human Rights and subject to its human rights law. This would solve the problem of conflicting case law.1314 SEAT All the EU's judicial bodies are based in Luxembourg . Separate from the political institutions in Brussels and Strasbourg . It is based in the Palais building, currently under expansion, in the Kirchberg district of Luxembourg. Luxembourg was chosen as the provisional seat of the Court on 1952-07-23 with the establishment of the European Coal And Steel Community . Its first hearing there was held on 1954-10-28 in a building down as Villa Vauban, the seat until 1959 when it would move to the Côte d'Eich building and then to the Palais building in 1972.15 In 1965 the member states to establish Luxembourg as the permanent seat of the Court. Future judicial bodies (First Instance and Auditors) would also be based in the city. The decision was confirmed by the European Council at Edinburgh in 1992. However there was no reference to future bodies being in Luxembourg. In reaction to this, the Luxembourgian government issued its own declaration stating it did not surrender those provisions agreed upon in 1965. The Edinburgh decision was attached to the Amsterdam Treaty . With the Treaty Of Nice Luxembourg attached a declaration stating it did not claim the seat of the ''Boards of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market'' - even if it were to become a judicial body. SEE ALSO
REFERENCES EXTERNAL LINKS
|
|
|