Dravidians Website Links For
Dravidian
 

Information About

Dravidians





Ethnic Information

  group Dravidian
  pop approx '''250 million'''
  region2 '' Tamil Nadu ''
  region3 '' Kerala ''
  region4 '' Karnataka ''
  region5 '' Andhra Pradesh ''
  region7 '' Balochistan ''
  region19 (some parts where people speak Kurukh )
  languages Dravidian Languages
  religions Hinduism , Christianity , Islam , Jainism , Buddhism


Dravidian people refers to populations who speak languages belonging to the Dravidian Language Family . Populations of speakers are found mostly in Southern India and some minor populations are found in Brahui speaking pockets of Pakistan, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka.


CONCEPT OF THE DRAVIDIAN PEOPLE

The term Dravidian is taken from the Sanskrit term Dravida . It was adopted following the publication of Robert Caldwell 's ''Comparative grammar of the Dravidian or South-Indian family of languages'' (1856); a publication which established the language grouping as one of the major language groups of the world.

However over seventy three languages are presently listed as Dravidian in the study . Further the languages are spread out and cover parts of India, Pakistan and Sri Lanka as is indicated in the study .


Racial classifications

See Also: Racial groups in India (historical definitions)


Classical anthropologists have long debated the racial classification of Indians, in particular Dravidians. One scheme labeled Dravidians as the Australoid or Veddoid race in about the 40 human races in that system.

Since skin color is subject to strong Selective pressure, similar skin colors can result from convergent adaptation rather than from genetic relatedness. Skin color of Dravidians (people who are native speakers of Dravidian languages) can range from very dark brown to almost white skin. Sub-Saharan Africans, populations from India, and Indigenous Australians have similar skin pigmentation, but genetically they are no more similar than are other widely separated groups. World Haplogroup Maps Furthermore, in some parts of the world in which people from different regions have mixed extensively, the connection between skin color and ancestry has been substantially weakened (Parra et al. 2004).

However Richard McCulloch (who advocated Racial Separatism ) said that only the people of Central India belong to the Dravidic race while the South Indians are Veddoid. {Link without Title}


Genetic classifications

See Also: Indian genetic studies


The Stanley Marion Garn considered in the 1960s that the entirety of the Indian Subcontinent to be a "race" genetically distinct from other populations.Garn SM. Coon. On the Number of Races of Mankind. In Garn S, editor. Readings on race. Springfield C.C. Thomas.Robert Jurmain, Lynn Kilgore, Wenda Trevathan, and Harry Nelson. Introduction to Physical Anthropology. 9th ed. (Canada: Thompson Learning, 2003) Others, such as Lynn B. Jorde and Stephen P. Wooding, claim South Indians are genetic intermediaries between Europeans and East Asians.Jorde, Lynn B Wooding, Stephen P. Nature Genetics. Department of Human Genetics. 2004. . Bamshad, M.J. et al. Human population genetic structure and inference of group membership. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 72, 578−589 (2003).Rosenberg, N.A. et al. Genetic structure of human populations. Science 298, 2381−2385 (2002).

Recent studies of the distribution of DNA Entrez PubMed: Human mtDNA hypervariable regions, HVR I and II, hint at deep common maternal founder and subsequent maternal gene flow in Indian population groups in India have cast overwhelmingly strong doubt for a biological Dravidian "race" distinct from non-Dravidians in the Indian subcontinent.

This doubtfulness applies to both paternal and maternal descent; however, it does not preclude the possibility of distinctive South Indian ancestries associated with Dravidian languages.Sitalaximi, T "Microsatellite Diversity among Three Endogamous Tamil Populations Suggests Their Origin from a Separate Dravidian Genetic Pool"
''Human Biology'' - Volume 75, Number 5, October 2003, pp. 673-685


Linguistic classifications

See Also: Dravidian languages


The best known Dravidian languages are: Tamil (தமிழ்), Kannada (ಕನ್ನಡ), Malayalam (മലയാളം), Telugu (తెలుగు), and Tulu (ತುಳು). Notably one Dravidian language, Brahui (بروہی), is spoken in Pakistan and minor Tribal languages are used in Nepal and Bangladesh, perhaps hinting at the language family's wider distribution prior to the spread of the Indo-Aryan Languages , though relatively recent migrations of populations have also been proposed.


Early arrival theory


language family. However, S.A. Starostin has disputed the existence of an Elamo-Dravidian language family.

According to a view put forward by Geneticist Luigi Luca Cavalli-Sforza in the book ''The History and Geography of Human Genes'', the Dravidians were preceded in the subcontinent by an Austro-Asiatic people, and followed by Indo-European -speaking Migrant s sometime later. The original inhabitants may be identified with the speakers of the Munda Languages , which are unrelated to either Indo-Aryan or Dravidian languages. However, the Munda languages, as a subgroup of the larger Austro-Asiatic Language Family , are known to have arrived in the Indian subcontinent from the east, possibly from the area that is now southwestern China , so any genetic similarity between the present-day speakers of the Munda languages and the "original inhabitants" of India is likely to be due to assimilation of the natives by Southeast Asian immigrants speaking a proto-Munda language.

Some linguists believe that Dravidian-speaking people were spread throughout the Indian Subcontinent before the Aryans settled there. In this view the early Indus Valley Civilization ( Harappa and Mohenjo Daro ) is often identified as having been Dravidian {Link without Title} .
According to them it is now considered likely that the collapse of Indus Valley civilization was caused by environmental change (drought) which then encouraged the migration of the nomadic Indo-Aryans into the area. In that perspective it is therefore more likely that the Dravidian speakers of South India were already living in the region and were merely one of the groups little affected by the initial Indo-Aryan Migration .


Late arrival theory

Some scholars like J. Bloch and M. Witzel believe that the Dravidians moved into an already Indo-Aryan speaking area after the oldest parts of the Rig Veda were already composed (see Bryant 2001: chapter 5)

This theory might be supported if a higher antiquity of the Indo-Aryan languages could be established. However, since this theory is mainly a linguistic hypothesis, the Dravidian influence on Aryan languages must not necessarily be equated to a movement of populations.


Prominent Dravidian linguistic subgroups

There are three subgroups within the Dravidian linguistic family: North Dravidian, Central Dravidian and South Dravidian matching for the most part the corresponding regions in the Indian subcontinent.

  • '' province of Pakistan .

  • '' people the Central region of India.

  • '' , Tamil Nadu and Maharashtra .

  • '' Kurukh '' : These people belong to North-Dravidian subgroup. Found in India and Bangladesh. It is the only language indigenous in Bangladesh.

  • '' belong to South-Dravidian linguistic subgroup.

  • '', Sri Lanka , Singapore and Malaysia .

  • '' and Tamil Nadu .



Geographic distribution



POLITICAL RAMIFICATIONS

The concept of a Dravidian race has affected thinking in India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh about racial and regional differences.


India

See Also: Aryan Invasion Theory (history and controversies)
Dravidian movement


Some Indians believe that the British Raj exaggerated differences between northern and southern Indians beyond Linguistic differences to help sustain their control of India. The British Raj ended in 1947, yet all discussion of Aryan or Dravidian " Race s" remains highly controversial in India. It is now widely believed that the British only used this as their ' Divide And Rule ' blueprint for taking over the region.1The British also used this "theory" of perceived differences between so-called "Aryans" and "Dravidians" to propagate racist beliefs concerning the inherent "inferiority" of the Dravidians when compared to the "Aryans", thus justifying their colonization of South Asia (since the British identified themselves as "Aryans")2

It has also informed aspects of radical politics (e.g. Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam , DK , AIADMK , VC, etc.) in the Indian state of Tamil Nadu Nationalistic politics, which has at times appropriated the claim that Dravidians are the earliest inhabitants of India in order to argue that other populations such as the locally or Ritually dominant were oppressive interlopers from which the Dravidians should liberate themselves.


Sri Lanka

In Sri Lanka, the current Ethnic Conflict and the civil war are further complicated by the view that the majority Sinhalese and minority Tamils belong to two different ethnic and linguistic families. Sinhalese (like Dhivehi ) is an Indo-Aryan language that exists in the southern part of South Asia .


SEE ALSO



EXTERNAL LINKS



REFERENCES






  • Krishnamurti, B. , ''The Dravidian Languages'', Cambridge University Press, 2003. ISBN 0-521-77111-0, p19.