Cox Communications Article Index for
Cox
Website Links For
Cox
 

Information About

Cox Communications




  Company Logo
  Company Type Private
  Company Slogan Your friend in the digital age
  Foundation 1962
  Location Atlanta, Georgia , USA
  Key People Pat Esser , President<br /> James C Kennedy , Chairman<br> Barbara Cox Anthony and Anne Cox Chambers owners
  Num Employees 22,350 ( 2004 )
  Industry Telecommunications
  Products Cable Television , Broadband Internet , VoIP
  Revenue $7054B (2005) 1
  Net Income ''Not currently available''
  Homepage http://wwwcoxcom


Cox Communications is a wholly-privately owned subsidiary of .


HISTORY


Cox Enterprises expanded into the cable television industry in 1962 by purchasing a number of cable systems in Lewistown , Lock Haven and Tyrone, Pennsylvania , followed by systems in California , Oregon and Washington . The subsidiary company, Cox Broadcasting Corporation (later to be renamed), was not officially formed until 1964, when it was established as a Public Company traded on the New York Stock Exchange .

In 2000 Cox Communications acquired Multimedia Cablevision with assets in Kansas, Oklahoma and North Carolina and Media General with assets in Fairfax County, Virginia.

On November 1, 2005, Cox announced the sale of all of its Texas, Missouri, Mississippi and North Carolina properties, as well as some systems in Arkansas, California, Louisiana and Oklahoma to Cebridge Communications. The sale closed in 2006 and those systems were transitioned by their new owner from Cox branding to Suddenlink Communications .

On May 14, 2007, Cox announced that they had sold their investment in Discovery Communications for the Travel Channel, related assets, and $1.3 billion.3


OTHER BUSINESS UNITS



PRIVATIZATION

In 2004, Cox Enterprises announced its intention to purchase those shares of Cox Communications which they did not own. A $6.6 Billion tender offer was completed in December of that year, and Cox Communications has been a wholly owned subisidary since. This represents the second time Cox has been taken private by Cox Enterprises.


CONSUMER ISSUES

The cable industry spends millions of dollars annually on government relationships. Regularly this industry employs the spouses, sons and daughters of influential mayors, councilmen, commissioners, and other officials to assure its continued local monopoly and preferred market allocations, many of which have been questioned as unethical.[http://www.fppc.ca.gov/index.html?id=299

The monopoly on cable television has historically been enforced by local governments. Cox maintains thousands of such de facto monopolies. In order to provide service to individual homes, a cable provider must place its cable wiring along and across local streets or other rights-of-way. To do so, the provider must get permission from the local government(s) that own those streets via rights-of-way permits.

Operational permission comes in the form of a document called a local franchise agreement. Most of local government(s) chose to grant permission to only one company, however, recently states have developed broader franchising laws to drive more investment and competition. Changes in the federal law in 1992 had forced local governments to grant permission to other companies to provide service, however the U.S. Government found in 2006 that only 2% of U.S. households had a competitive choice. In some cases Comcast, with municipal government approval, had entered into market allocation schemes. By agreeing to not compete head to head, consumers thus are perpetually locked into a single monopoly cable provider with annual price escalations reaching 93% in the past decade. {Link without Title} {Link without Title} {Link without Title} {Link without Title}

A recent third party survey of citizens found approximately 62% of the respondents were very dissatisfied (along with another 25% who were dissatisfied) with the cost of cable television service. A majority of the respondents were satisfied with the friendliness and courtesy of customer service personnel, however, approximately 30% of the respondents rated the cable company's performance as poor. With regard to open-ended comments, respondents felt that the cost of the cable service was too high, a need for cable competition existed and the desire for a basic cable package offering was desired. Although respondents cited these critical issues, the local monopoly structure preserves the status quo of poor customer service, limited product choices, no direct competition and uncontrollable annual cable TV price increases. Relief for consumers is being created by state level a multi jurisdictional franchise and service process that will spur investment and competition; thus driving economic development sought by state and local government leaders. {Link without Title}

However, Cox is seen by many as the leading cable company when it comes to customer service. Cox's advantage is that it uses one customer-care provider, with U.S.-based centers, like Sykes Inc., though a majority are employee's who are in house, not contracted out. Rather than pushing agents to hurry customers off the phone and causing multiple call-backs, Cox strives to handle issues in a single call and grades agents on how well they eliminate problems. To avoid confusion, field technicians tap into the same system used by call-center representatives. Cox has even started a "geek squad" to help customers with tech issues, whether they involve its gear or not. {Link without Title}

The industry strongly lobbies against federal "family tier" and "a la carte" bills that would give consumers the option to purchase individual channels rather than a broad tier of programming. These anti-consumer issues continue to garner attention from state governments, Congress and FCC Chairman Martin. {Link without Title}


OnDemand


Cox now offers in about 90 percent of their markets, OnDemand, their video on demand product.
Recently, they added HD video on demand.

Current markets that do not have OD available are:


Cox hopes to have all markets OD ready by second quarter 2008.


CURRENT SYSTEMS


Arizona



Arkansas

Bentonville Also Services: Bella Vista, Bentonville, Cave Springs, Centerton, Gravette, Highlands, Hiwasse

Berryville Also Services: Beaver City, Berryville, Eureka Springs, Green Forest, Holiday Island

Fayetteville Also Services: Elkins, Farmington, Fayetteville, Goshen, Greenland, Lincoln, Prairie Grove, West Fork, Winslow

Fort Smith Also Services: Alma, Arkoma OK, Barling, Bonanza, Cameron OK, Cedarville, Central City, Chester, Dora, Dyer, Excelsior, Fort Smith, Greenwood, Hackett, Highway 71, Huntington, Jenny Lind, Kibler, Lake Alma, Midland, Mansfield, Lavaca, Mountainburg, Mulberry, Muldrow OK, Pocola OK, Rock Island, Roland OK, Rudy, Rye Hill, Sugarloaf area, White Bluff

Harrison Also Services: Bellefonte, Bergman, Dogpatch, Harrison, Valley Springs
Rogers

Siloam Springs Also Services: Colcord, Decatur, Gentry, Siloam Springs, Watts, West Siloam Springs

Springdale Also Services: Bethel Heights, Goshen, Elm Springs, Johnson, Lowell, Sonora, Springdale, Tontitown


Van Buren Also Services: Van Buren, See also Fort Smith


California



Florida



Georgia



Idaho



Kansas

Andover, Crawford Co., Great Bend, Lyons, Riley, Ark City, Derby, Halstead, Maize, Rose Hill, Arma, Dearing, Haysville, Manhattan, Salina, Auburn, Dodge City, Hesston, McPherson, Saline Co., El Dorado , Hoisington, Milford, Sedgwick, Bel Aire, Erie, Humboldt, Mulvane, So. Coffeyville, Benton, Finney County, Hutchinson, Newton, Sterling, Berryton, Ford County, Iola, Nickerson, Tecumseh, Burrton, Franklin, Jardine, Ogden, Topeka, Caney, Frontenac, Jefferson, Park City, Towanda, Cheney, Garden City, Junction City, Pittsburg, Tyro, Cherokee Co., Garden Plain, Kechi, Pottwawatomie, Valley Center, Cherryvale, Gas, Kingman, Pratt, Weir, Chicopee, Geary, Kinsley, Wichita, Coffeyville, Goddard, Larned, Winfield, Cunningham, Grandview Plza, Lindsborg, Yates Center


Louisiana



Nebraska



Nevada



New England



Ohio



Oklahoma



Virginia



EXTERNAL LINKS



REFERENCES