| Cantor Set |
Article Index for Cantor |
Website Links For Cantor |
Information AboutCantor Set |
| CATEGORIES ABOUT CANTOR SET | |
| measure theory | |
| topological spaces | |
| fractals | |
| sets of real numbers | |
|
CONSTRUCTION OF THE TERNARY SET The Cantor ternary set is created by repeatedly deleting the . The Cantor ternary set contains all points in the interval {Link without Title} that are not deleted at any step in this infinite process. The first six steps of this process are illustrated below. WHAT'S IN THE CANTOR SET? Since the Cantor set is defined as the set of points not excluded, the proportion of the unit interval remaining can be found by total length removed. This total is the Geometric Progression : So that the proportion left is 1 – 1 = 0. Alternatively, it can be observed that each step leaves 2/3 of the length in the previous stage, so that the amount remaining is 2/3 × 2/3 × 2/3 × ..., an infinite product with a limit of 0. This calculation shows that the Cantor set cannot contain any Interval of non-zero length. In fact, it may seem surprising that there should be anything left — after all, the sum of the lengths of the removed intervals is equal to the length of the original interval. However a closer look at the process reveals that there must be something left, since removing the "middle third" of each interval involved removing Open Set s (sets that do not include their endpoints). So removing the line segment (1/3, 2/3) from the original interval {Link without Title} leaves behind the points 1/3 and 2/3. Subsequent steps do not remove these (or other) endpoints, since the intervals removed are always internal to the intervals remaining. So the Cantor set is not empty, and in fact contains an infinite number of points. It may appear that ''only'' the endpoints are left, but that is not the case either. The number 1/4, for example is in the bottom third, so it is not removed at the first step, and is in the top third of the bottom third, and is in the bottom third of ''that'', and in the ''top'' third of ''that'', and in the ''bottom'' third of ''that'', and so on ad infinitum -- alternating between top third and bottom third. Since it is never in one of the middle thirds, it is never removed, and yet it is also not one of the endpoints of any middle third. PROPERTIES Cardinality It can be shown that there are as many points left behind in this process as there were that were removed, and that therefore, the Cantor set is Uncountable . To see this, we show that there is a function ''f'' from the Cantor set ''C'' to the closed interval that is Surjective (i.e. ''f'' maps from ''C'' onto [0,1 ) so that the Cardinality of ''C'' is no less than that of [0,1]. Since ''C'' is a subset of [0,1], its cardinality is also no greater, so the two cardinalities must in fact be equal. To construct this function, consider the points in the {Link without Title} interval in terms of base 3 (or Ternary ) notation. In this notation, 1/3 can be written as 0.13 and 2/3 can be written as 0.23, so the middle third (to be removed) contains the numbers with ternary numerals of the form 0.1xxxxx...3 where xxxxx...3 is strictly between 00000...3 and 22222...3. So the numbers remaining after the first step consists of
All of which can be stated as those numbers with a ternary numeral 0.0xxxxx...3 or 0.2xxxxx...3 The second step removes numbers of the form 0.01xxxx...3 and 0.21xxxx...3, and (with appropriate care for the endpoints) it can be concluded that the remaining numbers are those with a ternary numeral whose first ''two'' digits are not 1. Continuing in this way, for a number not to be excluded at step ''n'', it must have a ternary representation whose ''n''th digit is not 1. For a number to be in the Cantor set, it must not be excluded at any step, it must have a numeral consisting entirely of 0's and 2's. It is worth emphasising that numbers like 1, 1/3 = 0.13 and 7/9 = 0.213 are in the Cantor set, as they have ternary numerals consisting entirely of 0's and 2's: 1 = 0.2222...3, 1/3 = 0.022222...3 and 7/9 = 0.2022222...3. So while a number in ''C'' may have either a terminating or a recurring ternary numeral, only one of its numerals consists entirely of 0's and 2's. The function from ''C'' to {Link without Title} is defined by taking the numeral that does consist entirely of 0's and 2's, and replacing all the 2's by 1's. In a formula, : For any number ''y'' in {Link without Title} , its binary representation can be translated into a ternary representation of a number ''x'' in ''C'' by replacing all the 1's by 2's. With this, ''f''(''x'') = ''y'' so that ''y'' is in the range of ''f''. For instance if ''y'' = 3/5 = 0.100110011001...2, we write ''x'' = 0.200220022002...3 = 7/10. Consequently ''f'' is surjective; however, ''f'' is ''not'' Injective — interestingly enough, the values for which ''f''(''x'') coincides are those at opposing ends of one of the ''middle thirds'' removed. For instance, 7/9 = 0.2022222...3 and 8/9 = 0.2200000...3 so ''f''(7/9) = 0.101111...2 = 0.112 = ''f''(8/9). So there are as many points in the Cantor set as there are in {Link without Title} , and the Cantor set is Uncountable (see Cantor's Diagonal Argument ). However, the set of endpoints of the removed intervals is countable, so there must be uncountably many numbers in the Cantor set which are not interval endpoints. As noted above, one example of such a number is 1/4, which can be written as 0.02020202020...3 in ternary notation. The Cantor set contains as many points as the interval from which it is taken, yet itself contains no interval. (Actually, the irrational numbers have the same property, but the Cantor set has the additional property of being closed, so it is not even Dense in any interval, unlike the irrational numbers, which are dense everywhere.) Self-similarity The Cantor set is the prototype of a Fractal . It is Self-similar , because it is equal to two copies of itself, if each copy is shrunk by a factor of 3 and translated. More precisely, there are two functions, the left and right self-similarity transformations, and , which leave the Cantor set invariant: . Repeated Iteration of and can be visualized as an infinite Binary Tree . That is, at each node of the tree, one may consider the subtree to the left or to the right. Taking the set together with Function Composition forms a Monoid , the Dyadic Monoid . The s. The Hausdorff Dimension of the Cantor set is equal to . Topological and analytical properties As the above summation argument shows, the Cantor set is uncountable but has Lebesgue Measure 0. Since the Cantor set is the complement of a Union of Open Set s, it itself is a Closed subset of the reals, and therefore a Complete Metric Space . Since it is also Bounded , the Heine-Borel Theorem says that it must be Compact . For any point in the Cantor set and any arbitrarily small neighborhood of the point, there is some other number with a ternary numeral of only 0's and 2's, as well as numbers whose ternary numerals contain 1's. Hence, every point in the Cantor set is an Accumulation Point , but none is an Interior Point . A closed set in which every point is an accumulation point is also called a Perfect Set in Topology , while a closed subset of the interval with no interior points is Nowhere Dense in the interval. Every point of the Cantor set is a Cluster Point of the Cantor set. Every point of the Cantor set is also a cluster point of the complement of the Cantor set. For two points in the Cantor set, there will be some ternary digit where they differ — one d will have 0 and the other 2. By splitting the Cantor set into "halves" depending on the value of this digit, one obtains a partition of the Cantor set into two closed sets that separate the original two points. In the Relative Topology on the Cantor set, the points have been separated by a Clopen Set . Consequently the Cantor set is Totally Disconnected . As a compact totally disconnected Hausdorff Space , the Cantor set is an example of a Stone Space . As a . The Basis for the open sets of the product topology are Cylinder Set s; the homeomorphism maps these to the Subspace Topology that the Cantor set inherits from the natural topology on the real number line. From the above characterization, the Cantor set is homeomorphic to the P-adic Integers , and, if one point is removed from it, to the P-adic Numbers . The Cantor set is Compact ; this is a consequence of Tychonoff's Theorem , as it is a product of a countable number of copies of the compact set . The Cantor set can be endowed with a Metric , the P-adic Metric . Given two sequences , the distance between them may be given by , where is the smallest index such that ; if there is no such index, then the two sequences are the same, and one defines the distance to be zero. This turns the Cantor set into a Metric Space . Every nonempty totally-disconnected perfect compact metric space is homeomorphic to the Cantor set. See Cantor Space for more on spaces homeomorphic to the Cantor set. The Cantor set is Universal in the Category of Compact Metric Space s. This means that any compact metric space is a continuous image of the Cantor set. This fact has important applications in Functional Analysis , where it is sometimes known as the representation theorem for compact metric spacesStephen Willard, ''General Topology'', Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1968.. VARIANTS OF THE CANTOR SET See main article Smith-Volterra-Cantor Set Instead of repeatedly removing the middle third of every piece as in the Cantor set, we could also keep removing any other fixed percentage (other than 0% and 100%) from the middle. The resulting sets are all homeomorphic to the Cantor set and also have Lebesgue measure 0. In the case where the middle 8/10 of the interval is removed, we get a remarkably accessible case — the set consists of all numbers in {Link without Title} that can be written as a decimal consisting entirely of 0's and 9's. By removing progressively smaller percentages of the remaining pieces in every step, one can also construct sets homeomorphic to the Cantor set that have positive Lebesgue measure, while still being Nowhere Dense . See Smith-Volterra-Cantor Set for an example. HISTORICAL REMARKS Cantor himself defined the set in a general, abstract way, and mentioned the ternary construction only in passing, as an example of a more general idea, that of a Perfect Set that is Nowhere Dense . The original paper provides several different constructions of the abstract concept. This set would have been considered abstract at the time when Cantor devised it. Cantor himself was led to it by practical concerns about the set of points where a Trigonometric Series might fail to converge. The discovery did much to set him on the course for developing an Abstract, General Theory Of Infinite Sets . SEE ALSO REFERENCES
|
|
|