Anti-chinese Legislation In Indonesia Article Index for
Anti-chinese 		Website Links For
Legislation 		 

Information About

Anti-chinese Legislation In Indonesia
  CATEGORIES ABOUT ANTI-CHINESE LEGISLATION IN INDONESIA
   
anti-chinese legislation
   
indonesian law
   
cultural assimilation
   
APPAREL
BABY
BEAUTY
BOOKS
CAR TOYS
CELL PHONES
DVD'S
ELECTRONICS
GOURMET FOOD
GROCERIES
HEALTH & PERSONAL
HOME & GARDEN
JEWELRY
MUSIC
MUSIC INSTRUMENTS
OFFICE PRODUCTS
SOFTWARE
SPORTING GOODS
TOOLS & HARDWARE
TOYS
VIDEO GAMES
SHOPPING HOME
MORE SHOPPING...



Discriminatory laws against Chinese Indonesian are laws, directives, or constitutions enacted by the government of Indonesia against Chinese Indonesian . They proliferated under the New Order regime under former President Suharto 's reign. Some of these laws have now been revoked since Suharto's resignation in 1998.


EXAMPLES

  • PP 10/1959 , which forced Chinese Indonesian to close their businesses by 1 January 1960 and relocate in urban areas.

  • Presidium Directive 127/U/Kep/12/1966 that explicitly requires Chinese Indonesian to adopt Indonesian-sounding Names .

  • Cabinet Presidium Instruction No. 37/U/IN/6/1967 , which prohibits further residency or work permits to new Chinese immigrants, their wives, or children; freezing any capital raised by "foreigners" in Indonesia; closure of "foreign" schools except for diplomatic corps and their families; the number of Indonesian students must be the majority and in proportion to "foreigners" in any state schools; and that implementation of the "Chinese issue" will henceforth be the responsibility of the minister for political affairs.

  • Presidential Instruction No. 14/1967 ( Inpres No. 14/1967 ) on Chinese Religion, Beliefs, and Traditions, which effectively ban any Chinese literatures and cultures in Indonesia, including the prohibition of Chinese characters. Although Chinese names are not explicitly mentioned, "newly naturalized" Indonesian Chinese were strongly advised to do so. (Annulled by former president Abdurrahman Wahid in Keppres No. 6/2000 ; annulment supported by former president Megawati Soekarnoputri in Keppres No 19/2002 by declaring Chinese New Year as national holiday)

  • Resolution of the Provisional People's Consultative Assembly No. 32, 1966 (TAP MPRS No. 32/1966), which effectively banned the use of Chines characters in newspapers and magazines.

  • Presidium Directive No. 240/1967 ( Inpres No. 240/1967 ) which mandates assimilation of "foreigners" and support the previous directive of 127/U/Kep/12/1966 for Indonesian Chinese to adopt Indonesian-sounding names.

  • Home Affairs Ministry No. 455.2-360/1988 on Regulation of Temples, which effectively and severely restrict building or repairing Chinese temples.

  • Circular of the Director General for Press and Graphics Guidance in the Ministry of Information No. 02/SE/Ditjen-PPGK/1988 , which further restrict the usage of Chinese language and/or characters.

  • Instruction of the Ministry of Home Affairs No. X01/1977 on Implementing Instructions for Population Registration and the confidential instructions No. 3.462/1.755.6 of the Jakarta government January 28, 1980 both authorize special codes in national identification cards to indicate ethnic Chinese origin. The code was "A01" Prefix .

  • Cabinet Presidium Circular SE-06/Pres-Kab/6/1967 on Changing the Term China and Chinese, requires the usage of the term "Cina" (which is considered a derogatory term by many Chinese Indonesians) instead of "Tionghoa" (as ethnic Chinese refer to themselves).



ANOMALIES AND EXCEPTIONS


There are exceptions to laws and regulations that ban the use of Mandarin . The use of Mandarin in traditional Chinese medicine prescriptions, for example, is not prohibited, since the legal proceedings related to this case have been suspended after lobbying made to the Attorney General (Jaksa Agung) of Indonesia by INI ( Ikatan Naturopatis Indonesia )


CURRENT PRACTICE

Although some of this legislation has been revoked or is no longer applicable, much of it still persists in practice. For an example, the requirement of Chinese Indonesian , including their Indonesian born descendants, to possess nationalization or repatriarchization certificates in order to obtain legal documents.


EXTERNAL LINKS

  • http://hukumonline.com/detail.asp?id=10607&cl=Kolom

  • http://www.komisihukum.go.id/article_opinion.php?mode=detil&id=94