Information AboutAeroacoustics |
| CATEGORIES ABOUT AEROACOUSTICS | |
| acoustics | |
| aerodynamics | |
| fluid dynamics | |
|
LIGHTHILL'S EQUATION Lighthill (1952) rearranged the Navier-Stokes equations, which govern the Flow of a Compressible Viscous Fluid , into an Inhomogeneous Wave Equation , thereby making an analogy between Fluid Mechanics and Acoustics . The first equation of interest is the conservation of mass equation, which reads : where and represent the density and velocity of the fluid, which depend on space and time, and is the Substantial Derivative . Next is the conservation of momentum equation, which is given by : where is the thermodynamic Pressure , and is the viscous (or traceless) part of the Stress Tensor . Now, multiplying the conservation of mass equation by and adding it to the conservation of momentum equation gives : Note that is a Tensor (see also Tensor Product ). Differentiating the conservation of mass equation with respect to time, taking the Divergence of the conservation of momentum equation and subtracting the latter from the former, we arrive at : Subtracting , where is the Speed Of Sound in the medium in its equilibrium (or quiescent) state, from both sides of the last equation and rearranging it results in : which is equivalent to : where is the operator. The above equation is the celebrated Lighthill equation of aeroacoustics. It is a Wave Equation with a source term on the right-hand side, i.e. an inhomogeneous wave equation. The argument of the "double-divergence operator" on the right-hand side of last equation, i.e. , is the so-called ''Lighthill turbulence stress tensor for the acoustic field'', and it is commonly denoted by . Using Einstein Notation , Lighthill’s equation can be written as : where : and is the Kronecker Delta . Each of the acoustic source terms, i.e. terms in , may play a significant role in the generation of noise depending upon flow conditions considered. In practice, it is customary to neglect the effects Viscosity of the fluid, i.e. one takes , because it is generally accepted that the effects of the latter on noise generation, in most situations, are orders of magnitude smaller than those due to the other terms. Lighthill (1952) provides an in-depth discussion of this matter. In aeroacoustic studies, both theoretical and computational efforts are made to solve for the acoustic source terms in Lighthill's equation in order to make statements regarding the relevant aerodynamic noise generation mechanisms present. Finally, it is important to realize that Lighthill's equation is exact in the sense that no approximations of any kind have been made in its derivation. RELATED MODEL EQUATIONS In their classical text on Fluid Mechanics , Landau and Lifshitz (1987) derive an aeroacoustic equation analogous to Lighthill's (i.e., an equation for sound generated by " Turbulent " fluid motion) but for the Incompressible Flow of an Inviscid fluid. The inhomogeneous wave equation that they obtain is for the ''pressure'' rather than for the density of the fluid. Furthermore, unlike Lighthill's equation, Landau and Lifshitz's equation is not exact; it is an approximation.
: And for the case when the fluid is indeed incompressible, i.e. (for some positive constant ) everywhere, then we obtain exactly the equation given in Landau and Lifshitz (1987), namely :
Of course, one might wonder whether we are justified in assuming that . The answer is in affirmative, if the flow satisfies certain basic assumptions. In particular, if and , then the assumed relation follows directly from the ''linear'' theory of sound waves (see, e.g., the Linearized Euler Equations and the Acoustic Wave Equation ). In fact, the approximate relation between and that we assumed is just a Linear Approximation to the generic Barotropic Equation Of State of the fluid. However, even after the above deliberations, it is still not clear whether one is justified in using an inherently ''linear'' relation to simplify a ''nonlinear'' wave equation. Nevertheless, it is a very common practice in Nonlinear Acoustics as the textbooks on the subject show: e.g., Naugolnykh and Ostrovsky (1998) and Hamilton and Morfey (1998). REFERENCES
EXTERNAL REFERENCES
|
|
|