2003 Invasion Of Iraq Article Index for
2003
Articles about
2003 Invasion Of Iraq
Website Links For
2003
 

Information About

2003 Invasion Of Iraq




See Also: Post-invasion Iraq, 2003–2006



Military Information

  campaign Operation Iraqi Freedom
  "#ref_1">1
  caption <small>Black Hawk Helicopters from the 2nd Brigade, 101st Airborne Division (Air Assault) move into Iraq during the opening stages of the 2003 Invasion<small>
  date March 18 , 2003May 1 , 2003
  place Iraq
  casus Although there were several attendant justifications given for the invasion, both George Bush and Tony Blair were explicit that the decision to invade Iraq rested on a "single question" (as George Bush put it on March 6th 2003)2 This was the allegation that Iraq possessed Weapons Of Mass Destruction , including Nuclear Weapons 3 of which it had to disarm Issues such as Saddam Hussein’s treatment of Iraqis, although used to justify the action as “liberation” after the invasion were officially insufficient to justify the invasion beforehand George Bush, speaking in October 2002, said that “The stated policy of the United States is regime change… However, if {Link without Title} were to meet all the conditions of the United Nations, the conditions that I have described very clearly in terms that everybody can understand, that in itself will signal the regime has changed”4 Similarly, in September 2002, Tony Blair stated, in an answer to a parliamentary question, that “Regime change in Iraq would be a wonderful thing That is not the purpose of our action our purpose is to disarm Iraq of weapons of mass destruction…”5 In November of that year, Tony Blair further stated that “So far as our objective, it is disarmament, not régime change - that is our objective Now I happen to believe the regime of Saddam is a very brutal and repressive regime, I think it does enormous damage to the Iraqi people so I have got no doubt Saddam is very bad for Iraq, but on the other hand I have got no doubt either that the purpose of our challenge from the United Nations is disarmament of weapons of mass destruction, it is not regime change”6 At a press conference on January 31st 2003, George Bush again reiterated that the single trigger for the invasion would be Iraq’s failure to disarm: “Saddam Hussein must understand that if he does not disarm, for the sake of peace, we, along with others, will go disarm Saddam Hussein”7 As late as February 25th 2003, it was still the official line that the only cause of invasion would be a failure to disarm As Tony Blair made clear in a statement to the House of Commons: “I detest his regime But even now he can save it by complying with the UN's demand Even now, we are prepared to go the extra step to achieve disarmament peacefully”8
  Additional Justifications, Used At Various Times Included,Iraqi Violation Of UN Resolutions, Saddam's Repression Of Iraqis And Iraqi Violations Of The 1991 Cease-fire "#ref_9">9 conflict=2003 Invasion of Iraq
  partof(allegedly) US War On Terrorism
  result Saddam Hussein and Baath Party toppled Establishment of new Government Occupation Of Iraq Emergence of Insurgency , and development of brutal Sectarian Violence and a violent Iraqi Civil War 10
  commander1 George W Bush <br /> Tommy Franks <br /> Tony Blair <br /> Gordon Brown <br /> Mike Jackson others
  commander2 Saddam Hussein <br /> Qusay Hussein <br /> Ali Hassan Al-Majid <br /> Izzat Ibrahim Al-Douri
  strength1 263,000
  strength2 375,000
  casualties1 173 KIA (140 US, 33 UK)iCasualtiesorg (was lunavilleorg) Benicia, California Patricia Kneisler, ''et al'', "Iraq Coalition Casualties"


  In February 2003, US Secretary Of State Colin Powell Addressed The United Nations General Assembly, Continuing US Efforts To Gain UN Authorization For An Invasion Powell Presented Evidence Alleging That Iraq Was Actively Producing Chemical And Biological Weapons And Had Ties To Iraq And "http://wwwinformationdelightinfo/information/entry/Saddam_Hussein_and_al-Qaeda" class="copylinks">Al-Qaeda , claims that have since been widely discredited As a follow-up to Powell’s presentation, the United States, United Kingdom, and Spain proposed a UN Resolution authorizing the use of force in Iraq, but US NATO allies Canada, France, and Germany, together with Russia, strongly urged continued diplomacy Facing a losing vote as well as a likely veto from France and Russia, the US eventually withdrew its resolution{{cite news title = US, Britain and Spain Abandon Resolution url = http://wwwglobalpolicyorg/security/issues/iraq/attack/armtwist/2003/0317usbritspainhtm



Criticisms about the evidence used to justify the war notwithstanding, many opponents of military intervention objected on the grounds that a diplomatic solution would be preferable, and that war should be reserved as a truly last resort. This position was exemplified by French Foreign Minister Dominique De Villepin , who responded to U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell's February 5, 2003 presentation to the U.N Security Council by saying that: "Given the choice between military intervention and an inspections regime that is inadequate because of a failure to cooperate on Iraq's part, we must choose the decisive reinforcement of the means of inspections."
“Nations take sides after Powell's speech” . CNN.com, February 6, 2003. Retrieved April 17, 2006.

On February 12, 2003 following the U.N. inspection report delivery, each one of the 15 representative of the U.N Security Council were given a 10 minutes speech to expose the position they chose for their country. The Hans Blix -led United Nations Monitoring, Verification And Inspection Commission report concluded on "no evidence of forbidden military nuclear activities", "no evidence of mass destruction weapon" (Iraq’s unconventional weapons program would had been successfully dismantled during the 1990s), but "Bagdad must better cooperate". Discours Villepin Powell à Onu (National Audiovisual Institute archives) , French news national edition, France 3 French public channel, 14 February 2003

First speaker was the Syrian Arab Republic representative -sole Arab state in the council- who strongly supported the continuation of the inspections, arguing that Iraq was accused to not respect the UN resolutions while Israel ignored more than 500 of them and owned mass destruction weapons as well. Next came the turn of de Villepin, he declared he "estimated the inspections gave results", that "they had to be continued", though he remembered that "France did not excluded the recourse to the force in the event of failure from the inspectors". Discours Villepin Powell à Onu (National Audiovisual Institute archives) , French news national edition, France 3 French public channel, 14 February 2003

France took the lead of the diplomatic solution front together with Germany and Russia, in the likes of a classic XIXth Century European Empires Alliance , as de Villepin advocated for an additional time for the inspectors:



(55) and French President Jacques Chirac (69) in 2001]]
Colin Powell responded that Iraq cheated with the UN and the inspections could not continue indefinitely. Discours Villepin Powell à Onu (National Audiovisual Institute archives) , French news national edition, France 3 French public channel, 14 February 2003

The direct opposition between diplomatic solution and military intervention involving France and the United States which was impersonated by Chirac versus Bush then later Powell versus de Villepin, became a milestone in the , a military intervention supporter and a George W. Bush partisan as argued by Roy Greenslade in '' The Guardian '' published on February 17.82 20 heures le journal : émission du 20 février 2003 (National Audiovisual Institute archives) , French news national edition, France 2 French public channel, 20 February 2003]


Distraction from the war on terrorism and other priorities

Both supporters and opponents of the Iraq War widely viewed it within the context of a post-, the Pentagon's former top operations officer, wrote in a 2006 Time article, “I now regret that I did not more openly challenge those who were determined to invade a country whose actions were peripheral to the real threat--al-Qaeda.”Newbold, Greg. "Why Iraq Was a Mistake". ''Time Magazine'', April 9, 2006. Retrieved on April 16, 2007.

Critics within this vein have further argued that containment would have been an effective strategy for the Hussein government, and that the top U.S. priorities in the Middle East should be encouraging a solution to the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict , working for the moderation of Iran , and solidifying gains made in Afghanistan and central Asia. In an October 2002 speech, Retired Marine Gen. Anthony Zinni , former head of Central Command for U.S. forces in the Middle East and State Department's envoy to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, called Iraq “maybe six or seven,” in terms of U.S. Middle East priorities, adding that “the affordability line may be drawn around five.”Boehlert, Eric. "I'm not sure which planet they live on" . ''Salon'', October 17, 20002. Retrieved April 17, 2007.


Potential to destabilize the region

In addition to arguing that Iraq was not the top strategic priority in the war on terror or in the Middle East, critics of the war also suggested that it could potentially destabilize the surrounding region. Prominent among such critics was Brent Scowcroft , who served as National Security Adviser to George H.W. Bush . In an August 15, 2002 Wall Street Journal editorial entitled "Don't attack Saddam ," Scowcroft wrote that: “Possibly the most dire consequences would be the effect in the region” where there could be “an explosion of outrage against us” that “could well destabilize Arab regimes” and “could even swell the ranks of the terrorists.”Scowcroft, Brent. "Don't attack Saddam" . ''The Wall Street Journal,'' August 15, 2002. Retrieved April 17, 2007.


RELATED PHRASES

See Also: Public relations preparations for 2003 invasion of Iraq


This campaign featured a variety of new terminology, much of it initially coined by the U.S. government or military. The military official name for the invasion was Operation Iraqi Liberation ( White House Press Release ). However this was quickly changed to "Operation Iraqi Freedom." Also notable was the usage " Death Squad s" to refer to Fedayeen paramilitary forces. Members of the Saddam Hussein government were called by disparaging Nickname s - e.g., "Chemical Ali" ( Ali Hassan Al-Majid ), "Baghdad Bob" or "Comical Ali" ( Mohammed Saeed Al-Sahaf ), and "Mrs. Anthrax" or "Chemical Sally" ( Huda Salih Mahdi Ammash ). Saddam Hussein was systematically referred to as "Saddam", which some Westerners mistakenly believed to be disparaging. (Although there is no consensus about how to refer to him in English, "Saddam" is acceptable usage, and is how people in Iraq and the Middle East generally refer to him.83)

Terminology introduced or popularized during the war include:

Many slogans and terms coined came to be used by Bush's political opponents, or those opposed to the war. For example, in April 2003 , a popular folk protest singer.


SEE ALSO





NOTES AND REFERENCES






ADDITIONAL REFERENCES



FURTHER READING



DOCUMENTARIES



EXTERNAL LINKS



VIDEO