| Treason Act 1695 |
Article Index for Treason Act |
Website Links For Act |
Information AboutTreason Act 1695 |
| CATEGORIES ABOUT TREASON ACT 1695 | |
| 1695 in law | |
| treason | |
| acts of the parliament of england | |
|
Provisions The Act provided that:
History The Act was passed because previously the law had been extremely harsh, allowing little opportunity for a defendant to defend himself and enabling trumped-up charges of treason to succeed. Today most of the Act has been repealed, but the three year time limit still survives (''see below''), and of course the rights to be represented and to have a copy of the indictment (now free of charge) still exist in other legislation. However the "two witnesses" rule no longer exists in the United Kingdom . In 1800 this rule, and all other special rules of evidence in treason cases, were abolished for cases of killing or attempting to kill the Sovereign. The Treason Act 1842 extended this exception still further, to all attempts to maim or wound the Sovereign (non-lethal assaults on the Sovereign had been made treason in 1795 .) Finally in 1945 the special status of treason was removed for all kinds of treason, and ever since then the evidence required, and the procedure followed, in treason proceedings has been the same as in murder trials. The Act Today The three year time limit described above - and the original exception to it - are still on the law books today, and are contained in sections 5 and 6 of the Act. However grand juries were abolished in England in 1933, and now indictments are signed by judges. When in the 1990s a British newspaper attempted to have James Hewitt prosecuted under the Treason Act 1351 for an alleged affair with Diana, Princess Of Wales , no charges were brought, in part because it could not be proved that the affair had ended less than three years previously. |
|
|