Tibeto-burman Languages Website Links For
Languages
 

Information About

Tibeto-burman Languages




The subfamily includes approximately 350 languages; Burmese has the most speakers (approximately 32 million). Approximately six million Tibetans speak one of several related languages.

Some linguists (including Shafer 1966 and George Van Driem ) advocate elevating "Tibeto-Burman" to displace "Sino-Tibetan" as the top-tier language family, with the Chinese Languages (Sinitic) classified as a branch of the Tibeto-Burman/Sino-Tibetan family.Van Driem, George "Tibeto-Burman Phylogeny and Prehistory: Languages, Material Culture and Genes". Bellwood, Peter & Renfrew, Colin (eds) ''Examining the farming/language dispersal hypothesis'' (2003), Ch 19.


CLASSIFICATION


There have been two major classifications: Shafer (1966) and Benedict (1972). Since then, many languages previously inadequately documented have received more attention with the publication of new grammars, dictionaries, and wordlists. This new research has greatly benefited comparative work. Bradley (1997) is a newer classification that incorporates the newer data.


Bradley (1997)


I. ''Bodic'' (a.k.a. Western)
: A. Bodish
:: i. Central Bodish (a.k.a. Tibetan)
::: a. Western Tibetan
::: b. Central Tibetan
:::: i) Western
:::: ii) mNgaẖris
:::: iii) gTsang
:::: iv) dBus (a.k.a. 'Central' Central Tibetan)
:::: v) Southern Tibetan
::: c. Amdo Tibetan (a.k.a. Northeastern Tibetan)
::: d. Khams Tibetan (a.k.a. Southeastern Tibetan)
:: ii. West Bodish (a.k.a. Gurung, Tamang)
:: iii. East Bodish (a.k.a. Bumthang)
:: iv. Tshangla (a.k.a. East Bodic)
:: v. West Himalayish (a.k.a. Kanauri)
: B. Himalayan
:: i. Central
:: ii. Kiranti

II. ''North-East India'' (a.k.a. Sal)
: A. Bodo-Garo
:: i. Northern Naga
: B. Jinghpaw
: C. Luish (a.k.a. Sak)
: D. Pyu

III. ''Kuki-Chin''
: A. Southern Naga
: B. Kuki
: C. Chin
: D. Arleng

IV. ''Central''
: A. Lepcha
: B. Western Arunachal
: C. Adi-Mising- Nishi (a.k.a. Abor-Miri-Dafla, Tani)
: D. Digarish 'Mishmi'
: E. Keman 'Mishmi'
: F. Rawang (a.k.a. Nungish)

V. ''North-Eastern''

VI. ''South-Eastern''
: A. Burmese-Lolo (a.k.a. Burmic)
:: i. Mru
:: ii. Gong
:: iii. Burmish
:: iv. Loloish
::: a. Northern
::: b. Central
::: c. Southern
: B. Karen


Benedict (1972)


A very influential classification (although tentative) is that of Benedict (1972). This was a collaborated effort of Paul Benedict and Robert Shafer (completed around 1942-1943) with editing by James Matisoff . This classification puts Tibeto-Burman under a larger Sino-Tibetan phylum:

:Sino-Tibetan
:# Chinese
:# Tibeto-Karen
  • Karen

  • Tibeto-Burman


The Tibeto-Burman sub-family is then composed of 7 main branches:

I. ''Tibetan-Kanauri'' (a.k.a. Bodish-Himalayish)
: A. Bodish (in eastern & southern Tibet )
: B. Himalayish
:: i. "major" Himalayish (in western Tibet, western India )
:: ii. "minor" Himalayish (in Uttaranchal )
:: iii. Dzorgai (in Sichuan ) ''?''
:: iv. Lepcha (in Sikkim ) ''?''
:: v. Magari (in Nepal ) ''?''

II. ''Bahing-Vayu'' (a.k.a. Kiranti) (in Nepal)
: A. Bahing
: B. Khambu
: C. Vayu-Chepang
: D. Nepal Bhasa ''?''

III. ''Abor-Miri-Dafla'' (a.k.a. Mirish, North Assam) (in Sikkim, northern Assam )

IV. '' Kachin '' (in northern Myanmar )

V. ''Burmese-Lolo'' (a.k.a. Burmish) (in Sichuan, Yunnan , Myanmar, Thailand , Laos , Vietnam )
: A. Burmese-Maru
: B. Southern Lolo
: C. Northern Lolo
: D. Kanburi Lawa In Thailand
: E. Moso (a.k.a. Nakhi) (in western Yunnan)
: F. Hsi-fan (in western Sichuan)
: G. Tangut (in northwestern China )
: H. Nung ''?''

VI. ''Bodo-Garo'' (a.k.a. Barish) {in northern Assam, northern Myanmar)
: A. Bodo
: B. Garo
:: i. Garo A
:: ii. Garo B
: C. "Naked Naga" (a.k.a. Konyak) ''?''
: D. Chairel ''?''

VII. ''Kuki-Naga'' (a.k.a. Kukish) (in southern Assam-Myanmar area)
: A. Central Kuki
: B. Northern Kuki
: C. Old Kuki
: D. Southern Kuki
: E. Northern Naga
: F. Southern Naga

In this classification,


Dzorgai , Lepcha , and Magari seem to be most similar to the Tibetan-Kanauri branch. Lepcha may be a separate transitional branch like Kachin. Margari is also similar to Bahing-Vayu.


Nepal Bhasa (Newari) shares similarities to both Bahing and Khambu. Aka (a.k.a. Hrusso) may belong to Abor-Miri-Dafla. Digaro , Miju , and Dhimal may also be Abor-Miri-Dafla, but this even more uncertain. ''Kachin'' seems to be a transitional branch containing features similar to all other branches. Kadu-Andro-Sengmai (a.k.a. Luish) and Taman may belong to Kachin.


Nung may belong to Burmese-Lolo, but it also has similarities to Kachin. Pyu is similar to Nung.


Deori Chutiya (northern Assam) belongs to Bodo-Garo, although to which sub-group is uncertain.


Shafer (1966-1974)


Unlike Benedict (1972), Shafer's tentative classification does not separate Sino-Tibetan into two branches: ''Chinese'' and ''Tibeto-Burman''. Rather, Chinese (Sinitic) is placed on the same level as Benedict's subgroupings of Tibeto-Burman.

Sino-Tibetan:

: I. ''Sinitic''

: II. ''Daic''

: III. ''Bodic''

: IV. ''Burmic''

: V. ''Baric''

: VI. ''Karenic''


Ethnologue


I. '' Bai ''

II. ''Himalayish''
: A. Mahakiranti
:: i. Kham-Magar-Chepang-Sunwari
::: a. Chepang
::: b. Kham
::: c. Magar
::: d. Sunwari
:: ii. Kiranti
::: a. Tomyang
::: b. Eastern
::: c. Western
:: iii. Newari
: B. Tibeto-Kanauri
:: i. Dzalakha
:: ii. Lepcha
:: iii. Western Himalayish
:: iv. Tibetic
::: a. Tshangla
::: b. Dhimal
::: c. Tamangic
::: d. Tibetan
: C. Baima ''(unclassified)''

III. ''Jingpho-Konyak-Bodo''
: A. Jingpho-Luish
: B. Konyak-Bodo-Garo

IV. ''Karen''
: A. Pa’o
: B. Zayein
: C. Pwo
: D. Sgaw-Bghai
:: i. Bghai
:: ii. Brek
:: iii. Kayah
:: iv. Sgaw
: E. Zayein Karen ''(unclassified)''

V. ''Kuki-Chin-Naga''
: A. Kuki-Chin
:: i. Central
:: ii. Northern
:: iii. Southern
: B. Naga
:: i. Angami-Pochuri
:: ii. Ao
:: iii. Tangkhul
:: iv. unclassified Naga
:: v. Zeme

VI. ''Lolo-Burmese''
: A. Burmish
:: i. Northern
:: ii. Southern
:: iii. unclassified Burmish
: B. Loloish
:: i. Northern
::: a. Lisu
::: b. Samei
::: c. Yi
:: i. Southern
:: ii. unclassified Loloish
: C. Naxi
: D. Phula ''(unclassified)''

VII. '' Meithei ''

VIII. ''Mikir''

IX. ''North Assam''
: A. Deng
: B. Tani

X. ''Nungish''

XI. ''Tangut-Qiang''
: A. Qiangic
: B. rGyarong

XII. '' Tujia ''

XII. ''unclassified Tibeto-Burman''

XIV. ''West Bodish''

XV. ''Mru''


REFERENCES



BIBLIOGRAPHY


  • Benedict, Paul K. (1972). ''Sino-Tibetan: A conspectus''. J. A. Matisoff (Ed.). Cambridge: The University Press. ISBN 0-521-08175-0.

  • Bradley, David. (1997). Tibeto-Burman languages and classification. In D. Bradley (Ed.), ''Papers in South East Asian linguistics: Tibeto-Burman languages of the Himalayas'' (No. 14, pp. 1-71). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.

  • Shafer, Robert. (1966). ''Introduction to Sino-Tibetan'' (Part 1). Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.

  • Shafer, Robert. (1967). ''Introduction to Sino-Tibetan'' (Part 2). Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.

  • Shafer, Robert. (1968). ''Introduction to Sino-Tibetan'' (Part 3). Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.

  • Shafer, Robert. (1970). ''Introduction to Sino-Tibetan'' (Part 4). Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.

  • Shafer, Robert. (1974). ''Introduction to Sino-Tibetan'' (Part 5). Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.



SEE ALSO