| Proper Orbital Elements |
Article Index for Proper |
Website Links For Orbital |
Information AboutProper Orbital Elements |
| CATEGORIES ABOUT PROPER ORBITAL ELEMENTS | |
| astrodynamics | |
| celestial mechanics | |
The proper elements are to be contrasted with the Osculating Keplerian Orbital Elements observed at a particular time or Epoch , such as the Semi-major Axis , Eccentricity , and Inclination . Those osculating elements change in a Quasi-periodic and (in principle) predictable manner due to such effects as perturbations from planets or other bodies, and precession (e.g. Perihelion Precession ). In the Solar System , such changes usually occur on timescales of thousands of years, while proper elements are meant to be practically constant over tens to hundreds of millions of years. For most bodies, the osculating elements are relatively close to the proper elements because precession and perturbation effects are relatively small (See diagram). For over 99% of asteroids in the Main Belt , the differences are less than 0.02 AU (for Semi-major Axis ''a''), 0.1 (for Eccentricity ''e''), and 2° (for Inclination ''i''). Nevertheless, this difference is non-negligible for any purposes where precision is of importance. As an example, the asteroid 1 Ceres has osculating orbital elements (at Epoch November 26 , 2005 ) while its proper orbital elements (independent of epoch) are A notable exception to this small-difference rule are Asteroid s lying in the Kirkwood Gap s, which are in strong orbital resonance with Jupiter. s in the Main Belt . Note how Asteroid Family clumps are not discrenible on the left.]] To obtain proper elements for an object, one usually conducts a detailed simulation of its motion over timespans of several millions of years. Such a simulation must take into account many details of celestial mechanics including perturbations by the planets. Subsequently, one extracts quantities from the simulation which remain unchanged over this long timespan, and makes them the proper orbital elements. For example, the mean inclination, eccentricity, and semi-major axis. Historically, various approximate analytic calculations were made, starting with those of Kiyotsugu Hirayama in the early 20th century. Later analytic methods often included thousands of perturbing corrections for each particular object. Presently, the method of choice is to use a computer to numerically integrate the equations of Celestial Dynamics , and extract constants of motion directly from a numerical analysis of the predicted positions. At present the most prominent use of proper orbital elements is in the study of Asteroid Families , following in the footsteps of the pioneering work of Hirayama. EXTERNAL LINK REFERENCE
|
|
|