| Open Standard |
Article Index for Open |
Website Links For Open Standard |
Information AboutOpen Standard |
| CATEGORIES ABOUT OPEN STANDARD | |
| standards | |
|
Many technical specifications that are sometimes considered standards are proprietary rather than being open, and are only available under restrictive contract terms (if they can be obtained at all) from the organization that owns the copyright for the specification. Being an open standard also does not necessarily imply that no licenses to patent rights are needed to use the standard or that such licenses are available for free. For example, the standards published by the major internationally-recognized standards bodies such as the ITU , ISO , and IEC are ordinarily considered open, but may require patent licensing fees for implementation. Open standards which can be implemented by anyone, without royalties or other restrictions, are sometimes referred to as Open Formats . There is little really universal agreement about the usage of either of the terms "open" or "standard". Some people restrict their use of the term "open" to royalty-free technologies, while others do not; and some people restrict their use of the term "standard" to technologies approved by formalized committees that are open to participation by all interested parties and operate on a consensus basis, while others do not. The Danish government has attempted to make a definition of open standards, which also is used in pan-European software development projects. It states:
EXAMPLES OF OPEN STANDARDS System: Hardware:
Software:
PATENTS In 2002 and 2003 there was some controversy about using Reasonable And Non-discriminatory (RAND) Licensing for the use of patented technology in Web Standard s. Bruce Perens and others have argued that the use of Patent s restricts who can implement a standard to those able or willing to pay for the use of the patented technology. The Requirement to pay some small amount per user, is often an insurmountable problem for Free Software or Open Source implementations which can be redistributed by anyone. Royalty Free (RF) licensing is preferred by Open Source adepts. The GNU General Public License includes a section that enjoins anyone who distributes a program released under the GPL from enforcing patents on subsequent users of the software or derivative works. QUOTES
SEE ALSO
EXTERNAL LINKS
|
|
|