| Most Royal Candidate Theory |
Article Index for Most |
Shopping Candidate |
Website Links For Most |
Information AboutMost Royal Candidate Theory |
| CATEGORIES ABOUT MOST ROYAL CANDIDATE THEORY | |
| united states presidential elections | |
| royal | |
|
This theory has been pronounced "verified" by the late Harold Brooks-Baker , who, despite claims to the contrary, was never editor of Burke's Peerage , a publication which tracks royal lineage. The odds of the most royal candidate winning by accident, assuming a 50/50 chance, 50 times in a row would be something like 2,251,799,813,685,248 to 1. Less than one in two quadrillion. The proposition is disproven easily by counterexample: :Thomas Jefferson lost to John Adams in 1796 :John Adams lost to Thomas Jefferson in 1800 :Andrew Jackson lost to John Quincy Adams in 1824 :John Quincy Adams lost to Andrew Jackson in 1828 :William Henry Harrison lost to Martin Van Buren in 1836 :Martin Van Buren lost to William Henry Harrison in 1840 :Grover Cleveland lost to Benjamin Harrison in 1888 :Benjamin Harrison lost to Grover Cleveland in 1892 Obviously neither of the candidates in these pairings had acquired "more" royal ancestry in the interval between the elections. And though the notion of "more royal" is nebulous in the extreme, some of these pairings leave no doubt: Jackson has no known royal descent (in fact, has no known ancestry beyond his great-grandparents!) while John Quincy Adams is a descendant of several kings. Similarly, Martin Van Buren has no known royal ancestry, while William Henry Harrison is a descendant of King Edward I of England. Brooks-Baker's periodic announcements of the theory were decried by some as laughable, though regularly covered by American and British journalists in articles from the 1980s through the 2004 election. He claimed to have researched each candidate's ancestry himself. Some question his criteria—or indeed whether he even had any systemic method—for quantitation of royal ancestry, and whether he actually accumulated any data. REFERENCES
EXTERNAL LINKS
|
|
|