Minimal Pair Article Index for
Minimal
Website Links For
Minimal
 

Information About

Minimal Pair




English "let" + "lit" proves that phones and do in fact represent distinct phonemes and . The phones do not have to be vowels, as the English minimal pair of "pat" + "bat" shows. In fact, this pair differs in Voice Onset Time of the initial Consonant as the configuration of the mouth is same for and ; however, there is also a possible difference in duration, which visual analysis using high quality video supports.

Phonemic Differentiation may vary between different Dialect s of a language, so that a particular minimal pair in one Accent is a pair of Homophone s in another. This does not necessarily mean that one of the phonemes is absent in the homonym accent; merely that it is not present in the same range of contexts.


EXAMPLES



Differentiations in English

Following pairs prove existence of various distinct phonemes in English.


Differentiating consonants with same location and manner of articulation

In the articulation of Bilabial Plosive s, 4 phones are defined by the characteristics voiced/unvoiced and aspirated/unaspirated: , , and . In different languages only some of these may occur and the number of phonemes formed may be different again.

  • In English , phones as in "spin" and as in "pin" both occur, but are Allophone s of the phoneme and no minimal pair can be found to distinguish them, but the word "bin" shows that the phone forms a phoneme separate from .


  • In Mandarin only phones (and phonemes) and occur. In the Pinyin transcription is written "p" and is written "b" (using the two available latin letters for the two phonemes).


  • In French and many other European languages only phones (and phonemes) and occur.


  • In Hindi , all four phones are separate phonemes.


  • In Thai , three phones occur and form three phonemes, as shown by the example:



Differentiating vowels

The following table shows a minimal set in French distinguishing vowels, some or all of which may sound alike to an Anglophone, because the and sounds do not exist in English:


Differentiating consonants

A minimal triplet of consonants in French is:

Because is not a single phoneme in French, this shows a minimal pair between the presence and absence of next to , which shares its point of articulation. and differ only in point of articulation.

There are three verbs in Hebrew which demonstrate the distinction, in some dialects, between a velar stop and an uvular stop on one hand, and a glottal stop with and without tightening of the throat on the other:

In the following two Hebrew verbs, the only distinction is a glottal stop in the middle of the first word:

In Korean , phones in Korea and [l in Seoul are allophones of the phoneme /l/ and are perceived by native speakers of Korean as a single letter i.e. phoneme. The difference is that [r] is pronounced before vowels.

In Spanish , and [s are both allophones of /s/ and [z] appears only before voiced consonants as in ''mismo'' /mizmo/.


Differentiating chronemes

Hungarian and Italian have distinctive Length Of Consonant s, as did Latin . A differentiator for length is called a Chroneme . Note that IPA allows length to be indicating by doubling the symbol, commonly used for consonants, while generally the special lengthening sign is used for vowels. E.g. in Italian:

Hungarian , German and Thai have distinctive Vowel Length , as did Latin . E.g. in Thai (and compare this example also to the one on tone):


Differentiating tonemes

Languages such as and Tonal Language .) For example in Thai:


Differentiating stress

Spanish , Romanian and Italian have many minimal pairs differing only in stress. Dutch has several, e.g. (stress indicated by acute accent):

Minimal pairs may differ superficially in more than one place if one feature is dependent on the other.
For example, English ''record'' (noun) and ''record'' (verb) (and similar pairs) appear superficially not to be minimal pairs for stress because they differ in vowel quality as well. However, since the differences in vowel quality are predictable consequences of the differences in stress, such pairs are considered minimal pairs. The case is similar in Russian , eg. ''мука'' ('torture, pain') and ''мук'''а''''' ('flour').


EXTERNAL LINKS