Information AboutLeft-libertarianism |
| CATEGORIES ABOUT LEFT-LIBERTARIANISM | |
| libertarianism by genre | |
| history of socialism | |
| political philosophy | |
|
Historically, the term libertarianism was first coined by Leftist followers of Mikhail Bakunin to describe their own, anti-statist version of Socialism , as contrasted with the state socialism propounded by Karl Marx . In much of the world, it still has this meaning. However, after the founding of the United States Libertarian Party in 1971, the term "libertarianism" in much of North America came to be associated with radical Free-market Ideology . For the more original usage, see Libertarian Socialism . This article describes two distinct movements arising out of post-war North American libertarianism, both of which designate themselves left-libertarian. The first group has its origins in dissident sections of the United States Libertarian Party and anti-corporate followers of Murray Rothbard . It is "Left" insofar as it incorporates New Left critiques of imperialism, of state and corporate power, and of Intellectual Property . The second group includes academic political philosophers such as Peter Vallentyne , Hillel Steiner , and Michael Otsuka . It is "Left" in that it advocates ownership in common of natural resources and compensation for the enclosure of those resources, within a framework of libertarian self-ownership theory. ANTI-CORPORATE FREE-MARKETEERS The first attempt at rapproachement between the postwar libertarian movement and the Left came in the 1960s, when Austrian-school economist Murray Rothbard came to question libertarianism's traditional alliance with the Right in light of the Vietnam War . During this period, Rothbard came to advocate strategic alliances with the New Left over issues such as the Military Draft and Black Power . Working with radicals like Ronald Radosh , Rothbard argued that the consensus view of American economic history, wherein government has stepped in as a countervailing interest to corporate predation, is fundamentally flawed. Rather, he argued, government intervention in the economy has largely benefitted established players at the expense of marginalized groups, to the detriment of both liberty and equality. Moreover, the "Robber Baron Period", adulated by the right and despised by the Left as a laissez-faire haven, was not laissez-faire at all but in fact a time of massive state privilege accorded to capital. Although Rothbard eventually drifted back into the Old Right , his initial leftward impulse was picked up by activists like Samuel Edward Konkin III (founder of the Movement Of The Libertarian Left ) and Roderick Long . These left-libertarians argue that presently-existing Capitalism does not even vaguely resemble a Free Market , and that presently-existing Corporation s are the beneficiaries and chiefmost supporters of statism. By this line of reasoning, libertarianism should make common cause with the anti-corporate left. Rapprochement with the Left has led many left-libertarians to reject some traditional libertarian stances, such as hostility to Labor Union s and support for Intellectual Property , or even to limit valid real-property rights to use-and-occupancy. Left-libertarians tend to oppose Copyright s and Patent s as an illegitimate Monopoly , as argued by Benjamin Tucker . They may promote and argue for reconciliation between writings by authors as different as Pierre-Joseph Proudhon and David Friedman in part by acknowledging terminological differences, most evident by the word "property" itself. LEFT-LIBERTARIANS AND CULTURAL POLITICS Contemporary left-libertarians also show markedly more sympathy than mainstream or paleo-libertarians towards movements purporting to challenge non-governmental relations of power. For instance, left-liberarians Roderick Long and Charles Johnson have called for a recovery of the nineteenth-century alliance between radical liberalism and Feminism . Left-libertarians are more likely to take recognisably leftist stances on issues as diverse as feminism, gender and sexuality, race, class, immigration, environmentalism, and U.S. foreign policy. Current writes who have significantly impacted or explored this aspect of left-libertarianism include Chris Sciabarra , Roderick Long , Charles Johnson , Kevin Carson , and Arthur Silber . LEFT-LIBERTARIANISM IN POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY A number of English and American political philosophers have developed a somewhat different position, also labeled 'left-libertarianism', which argues for the validity and necessity of some social welfare programs within the context of libertarian self-ownership theory. , a professor of Political Philosophy at the University of Manchester wrote ''An Essay on Rights'', the definitive left-libertarian look at rights, and justice. Michael Otsuka has a book entitled ''Libertarianism Without Inequality'' that argues for incorporating egalitarian ideas into libertarian rights schemes. Phillipe Van Parijs has written extensively on left-libertarianism, especially economic issues in the theory. He is currently working on theories about the Universal Basic Income . G.A. Cohen, John Roemer, and John Elster have also written much literature about the ideas of self-ownership and equality within left-libertarianism. Left-libertarianism and property Classical libertarian theory is sometimes called "right-libertarianism." It places a very strong emphasis on Private Property . Unrestricted Capitalism and Free Market s are advocated by all right-libertarians, with some of them believing that property rights are the most basic rights of all. Vallentyne and other left-libertarian philosophers, on the other hand, take a more moderate - and, in their view, realistic - approach. They differ from right-libertarians on the issue that Robert Nozick calls the "original acquisition of holdings". That is the question of how property rights came about in the first place, and how property was originally acquired. Right-libertarians hold that "wilderness" is unowned, and that unowned resources are made into property by use. This is generally referred to as Homesteading . According to John Locke, when a person "mixes his labor" with a previously unowned object, it becomes his. A person who cultivates a field in the wilderness, by virtue of "mixing his personality" with the land, becomes the rightful owner of it. Vallentyne and some other left-libertarians hold that "wilderness" is commonly owned by all the people in a given area. Since there is no predetermined distribution of land and (they argue) since there is no reason to believe that, all things being equal, some people deserve more property than others, it makes sense to think of resources as commonly owned. Thus this brand of left-libertarianism denies that first use or "mixing labor" has any bearing on ownership. As such, it argues that any theory of left-libertarianism must structure its social and legal system around enforcing this idea of common ownership. Different proponents of this school of thought have different ideas about what can be done with property. Some believe that one must gain some kind of permission from their community in order to use resources. Others argue that people should be allowed to appropriate land in exchange for some kind of rent and they must either pay taxes on the profits made from the appropriated resources or allow the products of those resources to become common property. Historically, the Georgists were a leftist tendency within libertarianism. They believed the all humanity rightfully owned all land in common and that individuals should pay rent to the rest of society for taking up space. People in this movement were often referred to as "single taxers," since they believed that the only legitimate tax was land rent. However, they did believe that private property could be created by applying labor to natural resources. ''See also: Geolibertarianism .'' SEE ALSO EXTERNAL LINKS
|
|
|