| Leaky Bucket |
Article Index for Leaky |
Information AboutLeaky Bucket |
| CATEGORIES ABOUT LEAKY BUCKET | |
| algorithms | |
|
TRAFFIC SHAPING ALGORITHMS Two predominant methods for shaping traffic exist: a leaky bucket implementation and a Token Bucket implementation. Sometimes the leaky bucket and token bucket algorithms are mistakenly lumped together under the same name. Both these schemes have distinctly different properties and are used for distinctly different purposes . They differ principally in that the leaky bucket imposes a hard limit on the data transmission rate, whereas the token bucket allows a certain amount of burstiness while imposing a limit on the average data transmission rate. WHAT IS THE LEAKY-BUCKET ALGORITHM USED FOR? ] ]] The leaky-bucket implementation is used to control the rate at which traffic is sent to the network (see Figure 1). A leaky bucket provides a mechanism by which bursty traffic can be shaped to present a steady stream of traffic to the network, as opposed to traffic with erratic bursts of low-volume and high-volume flows. AUTOMOBILE TRAFFIC ANALOGY An appropriate analogy for the leaky bucket is a scenario in which four lanes of automobile traffic converge into a single lane. A regulated admission interval into the single lane of traffic flow helps the traffic move. The benefit of this approach is that traffic flow into the major arteries (the network) is predictable and controlled. The major liability is that when the volume of traffic is vastly greater than the bucket size, in conjunction with the drainage-time interval, traffic backs up in the bucket beyond bucket capacity and is discarded THE LEAKY-BUCKET ALGORITHM The algorithm can be conceptually understood as follows:
The size ''b'' of the bucket is limited by the available memory of the system. The Generic Cell Rate Algorithm used in traffic shaping of ATM networks is equivalent to the leaky bucket algorithm. INEFFICIENCY OF THE LEAKY-BUCKET IMPLEMENTATION The leaky-bucket implementation does not efficiently use available network resources. Because its leak rate is a fixed parameter, there will be many instances when the traffic volume is very low and large portions of network resources (bandwidth in particular) are not being used. Therefore no mechanism exists in the leaky-bucket implementation to allow individual flows to burst up to port speed, effectively consuming network resources at times when there would not be resource contention in the network. The token bucket implementation does however accommodate traffic flows with bursty characteristics . The leaky-bucket and token bucket implementations can be combined to provide maximum efficiency and control of the traffic flows into a network. SEE ALSO
<DIV ID="REF">REFERENCES</DIV> {Link without Title} Ferguson P., Huston G., Quality of Service: Delivering QoS on the Internet and in Corporate Networks, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1998. EXTERNAL LINKS |
|
|