| Interracial Marriage |
Article Index for Interracial |
Articles about Interracial Marriage |
Website Links For Interracial |
Information AboutInterracial Marriage |
| CATEGORIES ABOUT INTERRACIAL MARRIAGE | |
| marriage | |
| race | |
| multiracial affairs | |
|
An interracial couple is a romantic couple or Marriage in which the partners are of differing Race s. GENERAL Historically, there have been controversies over interracial couples, for reasons of Racist origin, such as fears of "racial impurity". South Africa , Canada and the United States are but a few countries that have had regulations banning interracial marriage. As Of 2006 , no countries have laws against Miscegenation , but opposition to interracial marriages remains part of the program of parties such as the British National Party , which has frequently been accused of stirring racial hatred, and hate-groups such as the Ku Klux Klan . U.S. AND INTERRACIAL COUPLES from the 1900s mocks interracial relationships.]] "In Social Trends in America and Strategic Approaches to the Negro Problem," Gunnar Myrdal (1948) ranks the reasons for segregation according to Southern whites in the 1930s and 40s from least to most important: jobs, courts and police, politics, basic public facilities, “social equality” including dancing, handshaking, and most important, marriage. This ranking scheme seems to have been relatively upheld well into the 1960s. Of less importance was the segregation in basic public facilities, which was abolished with the Civil Rights Act of 1964. And the most important reason for segregation, marriage, was not fully overcome until the last anti-miscegenation laws were stuck down later in 1967. In 1967, '' Loving V. Virginia '' struck down the last of the anti-miscegenation laws in the United States, and with this, the frontier of available marriage choices shifted out. The number of interracial marriages in the United States has been on the rise: 310,000 in 1970, 651,000 in 1980, and 1,161,000 in 1992 according to the U.S. Bureau of the Census 1993. Interracial marriages represented .7% of all marriages in 1970 to 1.3% in 1980, to 2.2% in 1992. However, black-white marriages still tend to be the most controversial in the public eye. From a recent poll of 1,314 Americans of all races, it was noted that 3 in 10 people are against black-white marriage, but are more willing to accept white-Hispanic or white-Asian marriages (Ford 2003). Marriage between Whites and Asians, and particularly light-skinned North East Asians such as Japanese, are most common. Reasons for this are often cited as being because of the great similarity in skin color, and low instances of ethnic strife between Whites and Asians in the U.S. since World War II. Bob Jones University in Greenville, South Carolina , has had a troubled record of outwardly prohibiting interracial dating and marriage on its campus. For decades, the university used biblical references to justify its position while threatening any student with expulsion for breaking this rule. BJU's interracial dating prohibition was not repealed until 2000, when then BJU president Bob Jones III announced its nullification on '' Larry King Live ''. (See also '' Bob Jones University V. United States '' (1983)). Interracial marriage disparities for certain races Although mixed-race partnering has increased, the United States still shows huge disparities between black male and black female Endogamy statistics. The 1990 Census reports that 17.6% of black marriages occur with whites. Yet, it is found that black men are 2.5 times more likely to be married to a white woman than a black woman to a white man. Indeed, when racial group size is controlled, white women are most likely to participate in exogamy. There is also a disparity between Asian women and Asian men: according to the Census data from 2000, Asian American women were 2.5 times more likely to be married to a white man than Asian American men married to a white woman. A similar trend can be seen in the UK. According to the 2001 census Inter-Ethnic Marriage: 2% of all marriages are inter-ethnic , black males were around 50% more likely than black females to marry outside their race, whereas women of Chinese origin were twice as likely as their male counterparts to marry someone from a different ethnic group. For the purpose of comparison, roughly four times as many (35%), the Philippines (27%), and the Korea s (21%)—the foreign partners of Japanese women are more diverse, with the Koreas representing 32%, "other" (i.e., not the Koreas, China, the Philippines, Thailand, the US, the UK, Brazil, and Peru) at 28%, and the US at 19%. (For historical reasons, figures for partners with North or South Korean citizenship consist almost entirely of Korean nationals born in Japan; see Zainichi Koreans .) In any event, the absolute numbers are small, as just over 1% of Japan's population is foreign. A new term has arisen recently to describe the social phenomenon of the "marriage squeeze" for African American females. The marriage squeeze refers to the belief that the most eligible and desirable black men are marrying non-black women, leaving black women wishing to marry black men with fewer partnering options. There is a corollary "squeeze" for Asian American males. Controversially, this may be due to the desire to "marry up," i.e., black men choose to marry white women, and white men choose Asian women. This creates a problem at both ends, for black women and Asian men. Education and interracial marriage Using PUMS data from both the 1980 and 1990 U.S. Census to determine trends among interracial marriage among whites, blacks, Hispanics, and Asian Americans, it may be seen that Endogamy (marrying within race) was more prevalent for African American men at lower educational levels. In 1980, the numbers were as follows: African American males without a high school diploma participated in endogamy at 96.5%; for those who received a high school diploma, 95.6%; for a college degree and above, the percentage of endogamy dropped to 94.0%. However, the rates for African American women changed very little with different educational attainment levels. For the African American woman who had not received a high school diploma the rate is 98.7%, high school diploma is 98.6%, with some college it is 98.2%, and college degree and more, 98.5%. And, during this time, there was a significant increase in marriages between whites and African Americans maintaining that African Americans are most likely to marry whites over other groups. The 1990 results show that rates of endogamy dropped for both males and females, albeit more for the African American male. In 1990, a black male with a college degree and more was participating in endogamy at 90.4%, for a black female with the same educational attainment level, 96.4%. The results for the propensity of individuals at higher educational attainment levels to participate less in endogamy over the 10 year period were similar across races, including whites, Hispanics, and Asian Americans. Immigrants and interracial marriage It is found that racial endogamy is much stronger for immigrants as compared to natives; it is 4.9 times more likely for black immigrants than for African Americans. Additionally, black immigrants have the highest rates of endogamy of immigrants. Also, black immigrants are much more likely to marry other same-race immigrants and African Americans, than to out-marry racially. Native-born whites are also 1.6 times more likely to marry a native-born black than an immigrant counterpart. Immigrant black women are generally more likely to marry native-born whites than their male counterparts. Cohabitation and interracial marriage Black men are 2.5 times more likely to be married to a white spouse and 3.3 times more likely to be cohabitating with a white person, as compared to their black female counterparts. Research yields that 7% of married black men are with white wives and 15% of black men cohabit with white women. REFERENCES SEE ALSO EXTERNAL LINKS
|
|
|