Gender-specific Job Title Website Links For
Job 		 

Information About

Gender-specific Job Title
  CATEGORIES ABOUT GENDER-SPECIFIC JOB TITLE
   
gender-inclusive language
   
job titles
   
APPAREL
BABY
BEAUTY
BOOKS
CAR TOYS
CELL PHONES
DVD'S
ELECTRONICS
GOURMET FOOD
GROCERIES
HEALTH & PERSONAL
HOME & GARDEN
JEWELRY
MUSIC
MUSIC INSTRUMENTS
OFFICE PRODUCTS
SOFTWARE
SPORTING GOODS
TOOLS & HARDWARE
TOYS
VIDEO GAMES
SHOPPING HOME
MORE SHOPPING...



See also Gender-neutral Language .


DEBATE


There is extensive debate as to whether gender-specific job titles are appropriate in a professional setting. This debate reflects the debate over gender-neutral language in general. The side for gender-neutral job titles usually makes an Ideological argument, that gender-specific job titles at some level promote Sexism in the workplace. The side for the more traditional, gender-specific terms usually makes a practical argument, that replacing the historical terms everywhere they appear (in documents, etc.) would be difficult and expensive, or that it is unnecessary. However, there are many (in particular Feminists ) who would claim that this argument is really a backlash against the argument for gender-neutral language.

There is much difficulty in resolving this debate, as in the case of gender-neutral language in general; however there is at least one difference. Whereas in the general case, there is often no appropriate gender-neutral replacement (e.g. the third person singular pronoun ''he'') (although the use of Singular They is increasingly common), there are gender-neutral versions of nearly all job titles.


GENERALLY ACCEPTED WRITING CONVENTIONS


Proponents of gender-neutral job titles believe they should be used, especially when referring to hypothetical persons. For example, ''firefighter'' instead of ''fireman''; ''mail carrier'', ''letter carrier'', or ''post worker'' rather than ''mailman''; ''flight attendant'' instead of ''steward'' or ''stewardess''; ''bartender'' instead of ''barman'' or ''barmaid''. In the rare case where no useful gender-neutral alternative is available, they believe both genders should be used.

Proponents of gender-neutral language advocate the use of a neuter form when where appropriate. For example, a company may seek to fill a vacancy and hire a new ''chairperson''. Since a gendered individual doesn't currently hold the position, its title reverts to a neuter form. Once that position is filled, advocates believe gender can be attached to the title as appropriate (chair''man'' or chair''woman'').

Sometimes this fomulation can lead to hyper-correcting gender-specific usage, in which women become ''chairpersons'' but men remain ''chairmen''. Some women opt to use the word ''chairman'' in preference to ''chairwoman'', subject to the Style ''Madam'' or ''Mister'' prefixing the title, which they perceive to be gender-neutral by itself.

Proponents believe that job titles that add a suffix to make it feminine should be avoided. For example, "usher", not "usherette"; "comedian", not "comedienne". Some of these are almost entirely obsolete now, such as sculptress, Poetess , and aviatrix. If gender is relevant, they believe that the words ''woman'' or ''female'' should be used instead of "lady" ("my grandmother was the first woman doctor in the province"), except if the masculine is "lord" (as in "landlady").

Terms such as "male nurse," "male model," or "female judge" are often used when the gender is irrelevant. Many advisors on non-sexist usage therefore deprecate them, saying that the statement of exception indicates that a worker of that gender is somehow an ersatz member of that profession. ( Woody Allen jokes that his sister was the first woman to be a male nurse in New York.)


SPECIAL CASES OF GENDER-NEUTRAL/SPECIFIC JOB TITLES

  • In the case of ''waiter'' and ''waitress'', the status quo seems to be to use those as gender-specific titles, with gender-neutral terms such as ''server'' (or sometimes ''waitron'' or ''waitstaff'') rarely used in practice when dealing with an individual outside North America. In North America itself, most people use the terms ''waiter'' and ''waitress'', and ''server'' is typically only used by restaurant staff (for example in job postings, to avoid implying that only one gender is acceptable).

  • Increasing numbers of women are calling themselves ''actors'' rather than ''actresses'', especially in the live theatre. The Screen Actors Guild annually gives out awards for "Best Male Actor" and "Best Female Actor".

  • The word '' Ombudsman " was borrowed from Swedish , where it consists of "ombud" ("representative") and "man" ("man"). The word "ombuds" did not exist in English prior to this borrowing but backformations such as ''ombudsperson'' and ''ombuds'' has become common since.

  • The gender-neutral ''fisher'' has been used for ''fisherman''; however, in Canada, Australia, Britain, Ireland and elsewhere many women who catch fish have inveighed harshly against this, demanding to be called ''fishermen'', which they argued was the correct gender-neutral term to describe their career choice. Similarly, many female horseriders have expressed a preference to be described as ''horsemen''.

  • Military ranks which contain the suffix "man" almost universally remain unchanged when applied to female soldiers. For example, a female soldier serving in a Guards regiment is still called Guardsman Smith.

  • A '' Midwife '' can be of either gender, the term coming from an Old English term meaning "with the woman."


These guidelines are by no means a complete standard, as there is still much disagreement on proper usage. Many associations and governments publish handbooks of job titles featuring official recommendations for gender-neutral language.