| Front Group |
Article Index for Front |
Website Links For Front |
Information AboutFront Group |
| CATEGORIES ABOUT FRONT ORGANIZATION | |
| espionage techniques | |
| types of organization | |
| front organizations | |
|
PRINCIPAL USERS OF FRONT ENTITIES Fronts are sometimes set up by Intelligence Agencies , Corporation s, Criminal Organization s, banned organizations, or other organizations that are engaged in activities with which they would prefer not to be identified. PRIMARY SPHERES OF INFLUENCE OF FRONT ENTITIES The front organizations attempt to appear independent while actually working to support the parent organization. This can exist, for example, in Politics , Commerce , or Religion , or in the areas where these intersect. In International Relations , a Puppet State is a State which acts as a front for another state. In the extreme, a front organization is completely controlled by its parent organization and this fact is a secret from the general public. However, many groups that are commonly considered front groups only approximate this model: control may be only partial, or the relationship may be somewhat open. FRONTS IN ORGANIZED CRIME Many Criminal Organization s have front companies - these are mainly used for the purposes of Laundering Money . FRONTS FOR INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES The airline Air America was set up by and wholly owned by the CIA , supposedly to provide Humanitarian Aid , but flew many combat support missions and supplied Covert Operation s in Southeast Asia during the Second Indochina War . Other CIA-funded front groups have been used to spread American Propaganda and influence during the Cold War , particularly in the Third World . FRONTS FOR RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATIONS Some religious organizations use front groups either to promote their interests in politics or to make their group seem more legitimate. For example, the Cult Awareness Network (CAN) is considered to now be a front group for the Church Of Scientology {Link without Title} . POLITICAL FRONT ORGANIZATIONS Pro-Israel lobbying fronts The ), ''San Franciscans for Good Government'' ( California ), ''Beaver PAC'' ( Wisconsin ), ''Cactus PAC'' ( Arizona ), and ''Icepac'' ( New York ) are examples of former AIPAC front groups. Communist fronts Communist and Marxist-Leninist movements have sometimes used front organizations to attract support from those who may not necessarily agree with Communist ideology. According to a list prepared in 1955 by the United States , Vol. 24, No. 1, April-June 2003. set up an Anti-war front group, International ANSWER . (ANSWER is no longer closely associated with WWP; it is closely associated with a WWP splinter, the Party For Socialism And Liberation , but PSL plays a more open role in the organization.) Trotskyist and other left groups argue that United Front s are, in fact, legitimate coalitions and that it is only the Stalinist concept of the Popular Front which is illegitimate or misleading. Fascist front organizations Civil Liberty and the Christian Council Of Britain (named in imitation of the Muslim Council Of Britain ) are front organizations set up by the Far Right British National Party . FRONTS FOR BANNED PARAMILITARY ORGANIZATIONS Banned organizations sometimes use front groups to achieve a public face. For example, banned Paramilitary organizations often have an affiliated Political Party that operates more openly (though often these parties, themselves, end up banned). These parties may or may not be front organizations in the narrow sense — they have varying degrees of autonomy and the relationships are usually something of an open secret — but are widely considered to be so, especially by their political opponents. Examples are the relationship between the Irish Republican Army and Sinn Féin in 1980s Ireland or between the Basque groups ETA (paramilitary) and Batasuna (party) in Spain . Similarly, in the United States in periods where the Communist Party was highly stigmatized, it often operated largely through front groups. CORPORATE FRONT GROUPS Corporations from a wide variety of different industries have been known to set up front groups. For example, some pharmaceutical companies set up tame "patients' groups" as front organizations. These groups put pressure on healthcare providers and legislators to adopt their products. For example, Schering Healthcare and Biogen Ltd. tried to put pressure on the UK National Health Service (NHS) to adopt its drug Beta Interferon to treat Multiple Sclerosis (MS) sufferers. Schering set up and funded a group called MS Voice, with its own website, which claimed to represent MS sufferers. Another pharmecutical company, Biogen, set up a campaign called Action for Access, which also claimed it was an independent organization and the voice of MS sufferers. People who visited the website and signed up for the campaign didn't realise that these were not genuinely independent patient groups. Computer software giant Microsoft created and funded the Association For Competitive Technology to defend its interests against charges of antitrust violations. Tobacco companies frequently use front organizations and doctors (although less openly and obviously than before). The Center For Consumer Freedom (CCF) is one of the more active corporate front groups and one of several front groups created by Berman & Co., a public affairs firm owned by lobbyist Rick Berman. Based in Washington, DC, Berman & Co. represents the tobacco industry as well as hotels, beer distributors, taverns, and restaurant chains. The group actively opposes smoking bans and lowering the legal blood-alcohol level, while targeting studies on the dangers of red meat consumption, overfishing and pesticides. Each year they give out the "nanny awards" to groups who, according to them, try to tell consumers how to live their lives. They also run affiliated websites such as [http://www.activistcash.com/ ActivistCash.com . A list of some alleged corporate front groups is maintained by the Multinational Monitor . {Link without Title} Some Think Tank s are corporate front groups, distinguished from other front groups by the additional criterion that they present themselves as research organisations. Because their names suggest neutrality, they can present the commercial strategies of the corporations which sponsor them in a way which appears to be objective Sociological or Economical research rather than political lobbying. ASTROTURFING '' Astroturfing '' — the term is wordplay based on " Grassroots " efforts — is an American term used pejoratively to describe formal Public Relations projects which deliberately seek to engineer the impression of spontaneous and populist reactions to a politician, product, service, event, etc. by many diverse and distributed individuals acting of their own volition, when such reaction does not in fact actually exist. Corporations have been known to "astroturf", but are not the only entities alleged to have done so. In recent years, organizations of plaintiffs' attorneys have established front groups such as Victims And Families United and the Center For Justice And Democracy to oppose Tort Reform . {Link without Title} NOTES SEE ALSO
EXTERNAL LINKS
|
|
|