| Field Capacity |
Article Index for Field |
Limousines in Field |
Website Links For Field |
Information AboutField Capacity |
| CATEGORIES ABOUT FIELD CAPACITY | |
| soil physics | |
| hydrology | |
|
It is defined as ''the amount of water held in soil after excess water has drained away and the rate of downward movement has materially decreased, which usually takes place within 2 - 3 days after a rain or irrigation in pervious soils of uniform structure and texture''. Veihmeyer and Hendrickson (1949) realised the limitation in this measurement and commented that it is ''affected by so many factors that, precisely, it is not a constant'' (for a particular soil), ''yet it does serve as a practical measure of soil water-holding capacity''. This term is to improve on earlier concept of Moisture Equivalent by Lyman Briggs . It is characterised by measuring water content after wetting a soil profile, covering it (to prevent evaporation) and monitoring the change in soil moisture in the profile. Water content when the change is relatively small is indication when drainage ceases called ''Field Capacity'', it is also termed ''drained upper limit'' (DUL). Lorenzo A. Richards and Weaver (1944) found that water content held at potential of -33 J/kg (or 1/3 bar) correlate closely with field capacity. Various potentials was also suggested from -1 J/kg for organic soils, -5 J/kg for soils in the UK, -10 J/kg for loamy soils, and -100 J/kg for heavy clay soils. There are also critiques of this concept: field capacity is a static measurement, in a field it depends upon the initial water content and the depth of wetting before the commencement of redistribution and the rate of change in water content over time. These conditions are not unique for a given soil. SEE ALSO REFERENCES
|
|
|