| Deliberative Democracy |
Article Index for Deliberative |
Website Links For Democracy |
Information AboutDeliberative Democracy |
| CATEGORIES ABOUT DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRACY | |
| political theories | |
| deliberative groups | |
| deliberative methods | |
|
Deliberative democracy, also sometimes called '''discursive democracy''', is a term used by Political Theorist s, e.g., Jon Elster or Jürgen Habermas , to refer to any system of political decisions based on some tradeoff of Consensus Decision Making and Representative Democracy . In contrast to the traditional economics-based theory of democracy, which emphasizes voting as the central institution in democracy, deliberative democracy theorists argue that legitimate lawmaking can only arise from the public deliberation of the citizenry. It is usually associated with Left-wing Politics and often recognizes a Conflict Of Interest between the citizen participating, those affected or victimized by the process being undertaken, and the Group-entity that organizes the decision. Thus it usually involves an extensive Outreach effort to include marginalized, isolated, ignored groups in decisions, and to extensively document Dissent , grounds for dissent, and future predictions of consequences of actions. It focuses as much on the process as the results. In this form it is a complete theory of Civics . The Green Party Of The United States refers to its particular proposals for Grassroots Democracy and Electoral Reform by this name. On the other hand, many practitioners of deliberative democracy attempt to be as neutral and open-ended as possible, inviting (or even randomly selecting) people who represent a wide range of views and providing them with balanced materials to guide their discussions. Examples include National Issues Forums, Study Circles, Deliberative Polls , and the 21st-Century Town meetings convened by AmericaSpeaks, among others. In these cases, deliberative democracy is not connected to Left-wing Politics but is intended to create a conversation among people of different philosophies and beliefs. A claimed strength of deliberative democratic models is that they are more easily able to incorporate scientific opinion and base policy on outputs of ongoing research, because:
Another strength of deliberative democratic models is that (according to their proponents) they tend, more than any other model, to generate ideal conditions of . This view has been prominently held by Carlos Nino . A failure of most theories of deliberative democracy is that they do not address the problems of voting. James Fishkin 's 1991 work, "Democracy and Deliberation" introduced a concrete way to apply the theory of deliberative democracy to real-world decision making, by way of what he calls the Deliberative Opinion Poll . In the deliberative opinion poll, a statistically representative sample of the nation or a community is gathered to discuss an issue in conditions that further deliberation. The group is then polled, and the results of the poll and the actual deliberation can be used both as a recommending force and in certain circumstances, to replace a vote. Dozens of deliberative opinion polls have been conducted across the United States since his book was published. Social Choice Theory presents deliberative democracy with a distinct challenge. Critics of deliberative democracy have pointed to Arrow's Impossibility Theorem as limiting the use of deliberative democracy. Deliberative theorists (in particular Christian List/ cf. http://personal.lse.ac.uk/list/ ) have responded with a recent body of research that has shown that deliberation actually makes the conditions necessary for Arrow's Theorem to apply less likely. SEE ALSO
REFERENCES
EXTERNAL LINKS
|
|
|