Climate Sensitivity Article Index for
Climate
Website Links For
Climate
 

Information About

Climate Sensitivity




Some constraints are also available from observations: Gregory et al. (2002) estimate a lower bound of 1.6°C by estimating the change in Earth's radiation budget and comparing it to the global warming observed over the 20th century. Recent work by Annan and Hargreaves combines independent observational estimates to produce a mean of about 3 oC, and only a 5% chance of exceeding 4.5 oC. [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-bib_query?bibcode=2005JGRA..11008105S&db_key=AST&data_type=HTML&format=&high=404820cd9319944 Shaviv (2005) carried out a similar analysis for 6 different time scales, ranging from the 11-yr solar cycle to the climate variations over geological time scales. He found a typical sensitivity of 2.0°C (ranging between 0.9°C and 2.9°C at 99% confidence) if there is no cosmic-ray climate connection, or a typical sensitivity of 1.3°C (between 0.9°C and 2.5°C at 99% confidence), if the cosmic-ray climate link is real.

Schlesinger and Andronova (using simple climate models) found that it could lie between 1 and 10 °C, with a 54 percent likelihood that the climate sensitivity lies outside the IPCC range {Link without Title} . The exact range depends on which factors are most important during the instrumental period: "At present, the most likely scenario is one that includes anthropogenic sulfate aerosol forcing but not solar variation. Although the value of the climate sensitivity in that case is most uncertain, there is a 70 percent chance that it exceeds the maximum IPCC value. This is not good news." said Schlesinger.

Forest et al. (2002; {Link without Title} ) using patterns of change and the MIT EMIC estimated a 95% confidence interval of 1.4–7.7°C for the climate sensitivity, and a 30% probability that sensitivity was outside the 1.5 to 4.5°C range.

Frame et al. (2005) and Allen et al. {Link without Title} note that the size of the confidence limits are dependent on the nature of the prior assumptions made.

Climate sensitivity is not the same as the expected climate change at, say 2100: the TAR reports this to be an increase of 1.4 to 5.8 °C over 1990.

The Transient climate response (TCR) - a term first used in the TAR - is the temperature change at the time of CO2 doubling in a run with CO2 increasing at 1%/year.

The ''effective'' climate sensitivity is a related measure that circumvents this requirement. It is evaluated from model output for evolving non-equilibrium conditions. It is a measure of the strengths of the feedbacks at a particular time and may vary with forcing history and climate state. Details are discussed in Section 9.2.1 of Chapter 9 in the TAR {Link without Title} .


REFERENCES


  • ''Quantifying uncertainties in climate system properties with the use of recent observations''; Forest, C.E., P.H. Stone, A.P. Sokolov, M.R. Allen, and M.D. Webster, 2002. Science, 295. 24 ( preprint )

  • ''Using multiple observationally-based constraints to estimate climate sensitivity''; Annan and Hargreaves, GRL, 2006 {Link without Title}

  • ''Constraining climate forecasts: the role of prior assumptions''; Frame, D.J., B.B.B. Booth, J.A. Kettleborough, D.A. Stainforth, J.M. Gregory, M. Collins, And M.R. Allen, 2005. Geophysical Research Letters, 32, L09702, doi:10.1029/2004GL022241. {Link without Title}

  • ''An observationally based estimate of the climate sensitivity''; JM Gregory, RJ Stouffer, SCB Raper, PA Stott, NA Rayner; Journal of Climate, 2002 .

  • ''Objective Estimation of the Probability Distribution for Climate Sensitivity''; Andronova, N., and M. E. Schlesinger. 2001., J. Geophys. Res., 106, D19, 22,605-22,612 data: [http://crga.atmos.uiuc.edu/publications/Climate.html