Branding Persons Article Index for
Branding
Website Links For
Branding
 

Information About

Branding Persons




The verb stems from Teutonic ''brinnan'', to burn.


HISTORICAL USE

  • The origin may be the literally dehumanizing treatment of a Slave (by the harshest definition legally not even a person) as mere livestock: just a biological entity owned and sold for arbitrary use and abuse (as agricultural work unit, house slave or toy). This was practiced by the European slavers (sometimes there were several brandings, e.g. for the Portuguese crown and the (consecutive) private owner(s), an extra cross after baptisement) as well as by African slave catchers.

  • To a slaveowner it would be logical to mark his property on two legs just like cattle, or even more since humans are more adroit at escaping.

  • Brand marks have also been used as a punishment for convicted criminals, combining Physical Punishment , as burns are very painful, with Public Humiliation (greatest if marked on a normally visible part of the body) which is here the more important intention, and with the imposition of an indelible criminal record- the mark was often chosen as a code for the crime (e.g. in Canadian military prisons D for Desertion, BC for Bad Character, most branded men were shipped off to penal colonies).

  • An intermediate case is when a convict is branded and legally reduced, with or without time limit, to a slave-like status, such as on the Galley s (in France branded GAL or TF ''travaux forcés'' 'forced labour' until 1832), in a penal colony, or auctioned to a private owner.


In criminal law a mode of punishment by marking goods or animals; in either case by stamping with a hot iron. The Greeks branded their slaves with a letter Delta, for Δουλος (slave). Robbers and runaway slaves were marked by the Romans with the letter F (''fur, fugitivus''); and the toilers in the mines, and convicts condemned to figure in gladiatorial shows, were branded on the forehead for identification. Under Constantine I the face was not permitted to be so disfigured, the branding being on the hand, arm or calf.

The Canon Law sanctioned the punishment. In Germany, however, branding was illegal.

The punishment was adopted by the Anglo-Saxons, and the ancient law of England authorized the penalty. By the Statute of Vagabonds (I 547) under Edward VI , vagabonds, gipsies and brawlers were ordered to be branded, the first two with a large V on the breast. the last with F for fravmaker. Slaves too who ran away were branded with S on cheek or forehead. This law was repealed in 1636. From the time of Henry VII , branding was inflicted for all offences which received Benefit Of Clergy (branding of the thumbs was used around 1600 at Old Bailey to ensure that the accused who had successfully used the Benefit Of Clergy defence, by reading a passage from the Bible, could not use it more than once), but it was abolished for such in 1822. In 1698 it was enacted that those convicted of petty theft or larceny, who were entitled to benefit of clergy, should be burnt in the most visible part of the left cheek, nearest the nose. This special ordinance was repealed in 1707. James Nayler, the mad Quaker, who in the year 1655 claimed to be the Messiah, had his tongue bored through and his forehead branded B for blasphemer.

In the Lancaster criminal court a branding-iron is still preserved in the dock. It is a long bolt with a wooden handle at one end and an M (for ''malefactor'' Latin for 'wrongdoer') at the other. Close by are two iron loops for firmly securing the hands during the operation. The brander, after examination, would turn to the judge and exclaim "A fair mark, my lord". Criminals were formerly ordered to hold up their hands before sentence to show if they had been previously convicted.

Cold branding or branding with cold irons became in the 18th century the mode of nominally inflicting the punishment on prisoners of higher rank. When Charles Moritz, a young German, visited England in 1782 he was much surprised at this custom, and in his diary mentioned a clergyman who had fought a duel and killed his man in Hyde Park, found guilty of manslaughter, was burnt in the hand, if that could be called burning, which was done with a cold iron (Markhams Ancient Punishments of Northants, 1886). Such cases led to branding becoming obsolete, and it was abolished in 1829 except in the case of deserters from the army. These were marked with the letter D, not with hot irons but by tattooing with ink or gunpowder. Notoriously bad soldiers were also branded with BC (bad character). The British Mutiny Act of 1858 allowed the court-martial, in addition to any other penalty, to order deserters to be marked on the left side, 2 inch below the armpit, with the letter M, such letter to be not less than an inch long. In 1879 this was abolished.


PERSISTING PRACTICES

  • Generally voluntary, though often under severe social pressure, branding may be used as a painful form of initiation, serving both as endurance and motivation test ( Rite Of Passage ) and a permanent membership mark, mainly in violent 'macho' circles. Branding is thus practiced:

  • --- by some street gangs

  • --- in prisons

  • --- as an extreme fraternity initiation in the (now minorized) tradition of painful Hazing (otherwise mostly paddling); it has been widely reported (even in a BBC feature) that U.S. president George W. Bush , while president of the Delta Kappa Epsilon chapter at Yale , was involved in introducing a practice in which pledges has to strip to be branded on the buttocks with a hot coat hanger bent into the shape of a capital delta {Link without Title} , a surprising practice among the richest families' priviliged youth in an Ivy League college.

  • Branding can be used as a strictly Voluntary Body Decoration .

  • In the Sadomasochistic scene, it is practiced as a form of bodily mutilation with consent.

  • In extreme BDSM Dominance And Submission relationships, a Consensual Slave may desire/accept a branding as a mark of belonging and commitment (possibly to slavery rather than to the specific master).



SOURCES


  • W. Andrews, Old Time Punishments (Hull, 1890)

  • A. M. Earle, Curious Punishments of Bygone Days (London, 1896).



SEE ALSO



EXTERNAL LINKS