| Armenian Verbs |
Article Index for Armenian |
Website Links For Armenian |
Information AboutArmenian Verbs |
| CATEGORIES ABOUT ARMENIAN VERBS | |
| armenian languages | |
| verbs by language | |
|
BASIC FORMS Infinitive The Infinitive of Armenian verbs is formed with the stem, the theme vowel, and the affix ''-l'': ''sirel'' (to love) sir + e + -l EA ''kardal''/WA ''gartal'' (to read) kard/gart + a + -l The endings reflect the number of Conjugation s possible. Western Armenian is conservative, retaining three conjugations: a, e, and i: I: ''sirel'' (to love) II: WA ''khōsil'' (to speak) III: EA ''kardal''/WA ''gartal'' (to read) Eastern Armenian has collapsed WA conjugations I and II as /-el/: ''khosel'' (to speak) Stems There are two main stems per verb, the present stem and past stem. For conjugations I/II, the past stem is identical to the present stem, which is basically the verb minus the theme vowel and ending: ''sirel'': pres/past ''sir-'' ''khōsil/khosel'': pres/past ''khōs-/khos-'' The third conjugation has an augment, ''-ac (sometimes ''-ec): ''kardal/gartal'': pres. ''kard-/gart-'', past ''kardac'-/gartac'-'' Participles The number and type of Participle s varies by dialect. The present and past participles are affixed to the past stem. Both dialects have the following participles: present in ''-ogh'': ''sirogh'' (loving) EA ''khosogh''/WA ''khōsogh'' (speaking) EA ''kardac'ogh''/WA ''gartac'ogh'' (reading) Sometimes, this participle is used as an agentive noun: ''usanogh'' (student), fr. ''usanel'' (to study) future in ''-lu'': ''sirelu'' (loving) EA ''khoselu''/WA ''khōsilu'' (speaking) EA ''kardalu''/WA ''gartalu'' (reading) Both dialects have a past passive participle, WA ''-adz''/EA ''ac'': EA ''sirac''/WA ''siradz'' (loved) EA ''khosadz''/WA ''khōsadz'' (spoken) EA ''kardac'ac''/WA ''gartac'adz'' (read) Where the dialects differ is the past active participle. The Western Armenian participle is ''-er'', for all conjugations: ''sirer'' (loved) ''khōser'' (spoken) ''gartac'er'' (read) Eastern Armenian has ''-el'': ''sirel'' (loved) ''khosel'' (spoken) ''kardac'el'' (read) Eastern Armenian has two additional standard participles: In addition to present ''-ogh'', there is present ''-um'': ''sirum'' (loving) ''khosum'' (speaking) ''kardum'' (reading) ... and ''-lis'': ''sirelis'' (loving) EA ''khoselis'' (speaking) EA ''kardalis'' (reading) Western Armenian has one additional participle, a future in ''-lik''': ''sirelik''' (loving) ''khōsilik''' (speaking) ''gartalik''' (reading) TENSE/MOOD/ASPECT STRUCTURE Introduction Both dialects have the same number of moods, four ( Indicative , Conditional , Optative /subjunctive and Imperative ). The number of Tense s varies by dialect. The Aspect is divided roughly the same in both dialects, but the distribution is slighly different. Indicative tenses The number of tenses of the indicative mood in both dialects are the following: present, imperfect, preterite, future. The actual usage varies by dialect. Present The present tense is dialect-specific. Eastern Armenian uses the ''-um'' participle with the present tense of "to be" (EA ''linel''): Western Armenian uses a conjugated form of the verb preceded by the particle ''gә''. The conjugated form of the verb corresponds to the verb class, i.e. e-vowel, i-vowel or a-vowel:
''Examples:'' (EA) Na girk'ә kardum ē (He is reading/reads the book) (WA) An gә gartay kirk'ә. (ibid.) Imperfect The Eastern imperfect is the same construction, but substitutes the past tense of ''linel'': The Western imperfect is ''gә'' plus the conjugated imperfect: ''Examples:'' (EA) Nrank' im girk'ә kardum ēin (They were reading/would read my book) (WA) Anonk' gә gartayin im kirk'ә. (ibid.) Future The Eastern future tense is made with the future participle in ''-elu'' with the present tense of ''linel'': Western Armenian uses the present tense of the verb preceded by the particle ''bidi'': ''Examples:''
(WA) Tun bidi gartas ir kirk'ә. (ibid.) Note that due to the ending of the future participle, the forms ''em, es, enk', ek', en'' in EA are pronounced ''yem, yes, yenk', yek', yen''. Preterite This tense goes by many different names in various grammars, but Preterite comes closest to its actual function. Both Eastern and Western Armenian use a synthetic preterite (i.e. the endings are attached directly to the verb). The preterite is formed by deleting the infinitive ''-l'', then adding ''-c'i, -c'ir, etc...'' (see below). Note that WA 2nd conjugation in /i/ changes theme vowel to /e/ before adding the endings (in bold below), i.e. ''khōsil'' → ''khōse-'' ''Examples:'' (EA) Menk' mi girk' kardac'ink' (We read a book) (WA) Menk' gartac'ink' kirk' mә. (ibid.) Optative The Optative mood (called the subjunctive in some grammars) in Armenian is identical in both dialects. There are two tenses: non-past (present, etc...) and past (perfect, etc ...). Non-past The non-past optative is the simple "present" conjugated form, as compared to other Indo-European languages:
Past The past optative is the simple "imperfect" conjugated form, as compared to other Indo-European languages: A note about the /e/-conjugation and pronunciation: In both dialects, there is a latent /j/ sound between the theme vowel and the ending. This means that ''sirei/sirēi'' is pronounced /sireji/. The /a/-conjugation has, in orthography (and in transliteration above), a written "y". Conditional The Conditional in each dialect is distinct, based on how formed. In Eastern Armenian, the non-past conditional is formed by affixing ''k-'' before the non-past optative: ''ksirem'' ''kәsirem'' (I would read), ''kkhosi'' (he would speak), etc. Become of this, Eastern Armenian also has a perfect (i.e. past) conditional with ''k-'' plus past optative: ''kkardayink ''kәkardayink (we would have read), etc. An additional note: the Eastern conditional forms, with slight orthographic variation, are identical to the Western present and imperfect indicative forms (remember that EA /k/ = WA /g/): (WA) An gә gartay kirk'ә. (He is reading/reads the book, prs.indic) (WA) Anonk' gә gartayin im kirk'ә. (They were reading/would read my book, impf.indic) but: (EA) Na girk'ә kkarda (He would read the book ... , prs.cond) (EA) Nrank' im girk'ә kkardayin (The would have read my book ... , pst.cond) --- Western Armenian uses the imperfect of the verb preceded by the particle ''bidi'': Western Armenian, therefore, has no explicit 'perfect' conditional the way Eastern Armenian does. Imperative The Imperative mood in both dialects consists of the second person forms (singular and plural): The Eastern forms have additional spoken alternates: ''siri!, khosi!'' instead of ''sirir!, khosir!''; ''sirek'!, khosek'!'' instead of ''sirec'ek'!, khosec'ek'!''. Western Armenian also has a first person jussive form, which is usually classed as an imperative form. It is identical to the 1st person plural present form: ''sirenk'!'' (Let's love!) ''khōsink'!'' (Let's speak!) ''gartank'!'' (Let's read!) Other forms Necessitative mood Both dialects have what is known as the necessitative mood (also found in Turkish ). Both dialects have a past and a non-past necessitative. Eastern Armenian forms its necessitative by adding particle ''piti'' before the optative forms: ''piti sirem'' (I should/must love), ''piti khosenk''' (we shoud/must speak); ''piti kardayin'' (they should have/must have read), etc. Now note that the EA particle ''piti'' is orthographically identical to the WA particle ''bidi'', meaning that the EA necessitative forms are identical in form to the WA future indicative and conditional: (WA) An bidi gartay kirk'ә. (He will read the book, fut.indic) (WA) Anonk' bidi gartayin im kirk'ә. (They would read my book ... , cond.) but: (EA) Na girk'ә piti karda (He should/must read the book, np.necess) (EA) Nrank' im girk'ә piti kardayin (The should have read my book, pst.necess) --- Western Armenian forms its necessitative with the ''lu'' future participle plus the forms of ''әllal'' (to be): Example (non-past jussive): In yet another formation, the Western forms correspond to Eastern forms with a completely different function, this time the Eastern future indicative (and future perfect indicative (see below)), and the Western non-past and past necessitative: (EA) Na girk'ә kardalu ē (He will read the book, fut.indic) (EA) Nrank' im girk'ә kardalu ēin (They will have read my book, fut.perf.indic) but: (WA) An gartalu ē kirk'ә. (He should/must read the book, np.juss) (WA) Anonk' gartalu ēin im kirk'ә. (They should have read my book, pst.juss) Eastern "anterior" forms The Eastern dialect has, due to how the tenses are constructed, anterior forms which correspond to the perfect aspect. The present anterior (also called the Perfect ) is formed with the past participle in ''l'' plus the present form of ''linel'' (to be): ''sirel em'' (I have loved), ''khosel ē'' (he has spoken), ''kardac'al en'' (they have read), etc. The past anterior ( Pluperfect ) is the l-past participle plus the imperfect forms of ''linel'': ''sirel em'' (I had loved), ''khosel ē'' (he had spoken), ''kardac'al en'' (they had read), etc. The future anterior (future perfect) is the lu-future participle plus the imperfect of ''linel'': ''sirelu ēi'' (I will have loved), ''khoselu ēr'' (he will have spoken), ''kardalu ēin'' (they will have read), etc. PUTTING IT ALL TOGETHER Here are two tables, showing the full conjugation of each dialect's verb paradigms: Eastern , Western . Irregular verbs for both dialects will be dealt with at a later date... |
|
|