| Academic Freedom |
Article Index for Academic |
Website Links For Academic |
Information AboutAcademic Freedom |
|
THE RATIONALE FOR ACADEMIC FREEDOM Proponents of academic freedom believe that the freedom of inquiry by students and faculty members is essential to the mission of the academy. Academic communities are repeatedly targeted for repression due to their ability to shape and control the flow of information. When scholars attempt to teach or communicate ideas or facts that are inconvenient to external political groups or to authorities, they may find themselves targeted for public villification, job loss, imprisonment, or even death. In North Africa, a professor of public health discovered that his country's infant mortality rate was higher than government figures indicated. He lost his job and was imprisoned. The fate of Biology in the Soviet Union shows why society has an interest in protecting academic freedom. A Soviet biologist named Trofim Lysenko rejected Western scientific advances and proposed a new, unscientific approach to biology (called Lysenkoism ) that was based on the principles of Dialectical Materialism . Because of their propaganda value, Lysenko's ideas proved appealing to the Soviet leadership, and he became the director of the Soviet Academy of Agricultural Sciences; subsequently, Lysenko directed a purge of scientists who professed "harmful ideas," resulting in the expulsion, imprisonment, or death of hundreds of Soviet scientists. Lysenko's unscientific ideas were implemented on collectivised farms in the Soviet Union and China. Famines that resulted partly from Lysenko's influence are believed to have killed 30 million people in China alone. ACADEMIC FREEDOM FOR STUDENTS The ideas of academic freedom as a right of the student is German in origin. In this model (known in German as ''Lernfreiheit''), the student is free to pursue their own course of study, taking whatever courses they like at whatever university they choose. This ideal was carried to the United States in the 19th Century by some scholars who had studied at German universities. It was most prominently employed in the United States by Charles Eliot at Harvard University between 1872 and 1897 , when the only required course was freshman Rhetoric . In the U.S., students' academic freedom is legitimately regulated by the faculty's freedom to determine which viewpoints are supported by scholarly standards, peer review, and established norms in their disciplines. According to a U.S. appelate court decision, "a professor's rights to academic freedom and freedom of expression are paramount in the academic setting." For this reason, U.S. students do not have the right to insist that professors provide "equal time" for competing viewpoints. A student may be required to write a paper from a particular viewpoint, even if the student disagrees with that viewpoint, as long as the requirement serves a legitimate pedagogical purpose. However, the faculty's rights to determine legitimate subject matter are not absolute to the point of compromising a student's right to learn in a hostile-free environment." Professorial speech is protected only to the extent that it is "germane to the subject matter." ACADEMIC FREEDOM FOR PROFESSORS The concept of academic freedom as a right of faculty members (''Lehrfreiheit'' in German) is an established part of German, English , French and American cultures. All three acknowledge the right of a faculty member to pursue research and publish their findings without restraint, but they differ in regard to the professor's freedom in a classroom situation. In the German tradition, professors are free to try to convert their students to their personal viewpoint and philosophical system. Nevertheless, professors are discouraged or prohibited from stating their views, particularly political views, outside the class; in regard to his teaching, there should be no duties required of the professor, no prescribed syllabus, and no restriction to a particular subject. In the United States, academic freedom is governed by the "1940 Statement of Principles on Academic Freedom and Tenure," which was jointly authored by the American Association Of University Professors (AAUP) and the Association Of American Colleges (AAC). These principles state that "teachers are entitled to full freedom in discussing their subject." The AAUP works with colleges and universities, including private and religious institutions, to implement these principles as the basis for contractual relationships with faculty. Colleges and universities that are found to violate these principles are placed on a list of censured institutions. A professor at a public French university, or a researcher in a public research laboratory, is expected, as all rather than through normal administrative procedures. ACADEMIC FREEDOM FOR COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES A prominent feature of the English university concept is the freedom to appoint faculty, set standards and admit students. This ideal may be better described as institutional autonomy and is distinct from whatever freedom is granted to students and faculty by the institution. (Kemp, p. 7) The Supreme Court Of The United States said that academic freedom means a university can "determine for itself on academic grounds: # who may teach # what may be taught # how it should be taught, and # who may be admitted to study." ('' Regents Of The University Of California V. Bakke '', 438 U.S. 265, 312. 1978.) ACADEMIC FREEDOM AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT In the U.S., the Freedom Of Speech is guaranteed by the First Amendment , which states that "Congress shall make no law... abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press...." By extension, the First Amendment applies to all governmental institutions, including public universities. The U.S. Supreme Court has consistently held that academic freedom is a First Amendment right. However, the First Amendment does ''not'' apply to private institutions, including religious institutions. In addition, academic freedom involves more than speech rights; for example, it includes the right to determine what is taught in the classroom. Therefore, academic freedom is, at best, only partially protected by free speech rights. In sum, academic freedom and free speech rights are not coextensive and the relationship between the two remains unclear. In practice, academic freedom is protected by institutional rules and regulations, letters of appointment, faculty handbooks, collective bargaining agreements, and academic custom. CONTROVERSIES Public utterances and academic freedom In the aftermath of the September 11, 2001 Attacks and the wave of patriotic fervor that swept the U.S., public statements made by faculty came under media scrutiny. For example, in January 2005, University Of Colorado professor Ward Churchill published an essay in which asserted that the foreign policy of the United States was partly to blame for the attacks. On conservative news and talk programs, he was particularly vilified for describing the World Trade Center victims as "little Eichmanns ," a reference to Hannah Arendt's Eichmann In Jerusalem . Many called for Churchill to be fired for overstepping the bounds of acceptable discourse. Others defended him on the principle of academic freedom, even if they disagreed with his message. The "Academic bill of rights" The principles of academic freedom state that teachers should be free to teach and students should be free to learn. What happens when these freedoms conflict? Students for Academic Freedom (SAF), founded in 2001 by former Student Radical David Horowitz , seeks to protect students from a perceived liberal bias in U.S. colleges and universities. The organization collected numerous statements from college and university students who claimed that some of their professors were disregarding their responsibility to keep unrelated controversial material out of their classes, and were instead teaching their subjects from an ideological point of view. In response, the organization drafted model legislation called the Academic Bill of Rights, which has been introduced in several state legislatures and the U.S. House of Representatives. According to Students for Academic Freedom, academic freedom is "the freedom to teach and to learn." They contend in ''" The Academic Bill of Rights "'' that academic freedom promotes "intellectual diversity" and helps achieve a university's primary goals, i.e., "the pursuit of truth, the discovery of new knowledge through scholarship and research, the study and reasoned criticism of intellectual and cultural traditions, the teaching and general development of students to help them become creative individuals and productive citizens of a pluralistic democracy, and the transmission of knowledge and learning to a society at large." Accordingly, the Academic Bill of Rights calls for state and judicial regulation of colleges. Such regulation would ensure that professors:
According to the directs universities to implement the principle of neutrality by requiring the appointment of faculty "with a view toward fostering a plurality of methodologies and perspectives." This approach is dangerous: "It invites diversity to be measured by political standards that diverge from the academic criteria of the scholarly profession." For example,"no department of political theory ought to be obligated to establish 'a plurality of methodologies and perspectives' by appointing a professor of Nazi political philosophy." Concurring, the president of Appalachian Bible College in West Virginia fears that the Academic Bill of Rights "would inhibit his college's efforts to provide a faith-based education and would put pressure on the college to hire professors... who espouse views contrary to those of the institution." REFERENCES |
|
|