World Social Forum Article Index for
World Social
Website Links For
World
 

Information About

World Social Forum




The World Social Forum (WSF) is an annual meeting held by members of the Alternative Globalization Movement to coordinate world campaigns, share and refine organizing strategies, and inform each other about movements from around the world and their issues. It tends to meet in January when its "great capitalist rival", the World Economic Forum is meeting in Davos , Switzerland . This is not a coincidence. The date was chosen because of the logistical difficulty of organizing a mass protest in Davos and to try to overshadow the coverage of the World Economic Forum in the news media.

The WSF has prompted the organising of many regional drawn up by the World Social Forum.

In , Kenya .


HISTORY

The first WSF was held from 25 January to 30 January , 2001 in Porto Alegre , organized by many groups involved in the alternative globalization movement, including the French Association for the Taxation of Financial Transactions for the Aid of Citizens ( ATTAC ). The WSF was sponsored, in part, by the Porto Alegre government, led by Brazilian Worker's Party (PT). The town was experimenting with an innovative model for the local government which combined the traditional representative institutions with the participation of open assemblies of the people. 12,000 people attended from around the world. At the time, Brasil was also in a moment of transformation that later would lead to the electoral victory of the PT candidate Luiz Inácio Lula Da Silva .

The second WSF, also held in Porto Alegre from 31 January to 5 February , 2002 , had over 12,000 official delegates representing people from 123 countries, 60,000 attendees, 652 workshops, and 27 talks. One famous speaker was famed American linguistic author Noam Chomsky .

The third WSF was again held in Porto Alegre, in January 2003 . There were many parallel workshops, including, for example the ''Life After Capitalism'' workshop, which proposed focussed discussion on non- Communist , non- Capitalist , participative possibilities for different aspects of social, political, economic, communication structures {Link without Title} .

The fourth WSF was held in Mumbai , India, from 16 January to 21 January 2004 . The attendance was expected to be 75,000 and it shot over by thousands. The cultural diversity was one notable aspect of the forum. The other notable decision that was taken was the stand on Free Software . One of the key speakers at the WSF 2004 was Joseph Stiglitz .

The fifth World Social Forum for 2005 was held in Porto Alegre, Brazil between 26 January and 31 January . There were 155,000 registered participants at the Forum, with most coming from Brazil , Argentina , the United States , Uruguay , and France . A number of participants in the forum released the Porto Alegre Manifesto .
The sixth World Social Forum was held in Karachi, Pakistan.


CRITICISMS

's Chinatown echos the slogan of the World Social Forum: 'Another world is possible'.]]

The WSF has been criticised, particularly by Socialist and Communist left parties, for producing few practical ideas, concentrating instead on general and vague criticisms of Neoliberalism and Imperialism . On the other hand some, particularly Anarchists , have criticised the WSF for attempting to act as a central decision making location for dissident groups, as the Communist Internationals once did. Most WSF participants would counter that the WSF is not a decision-making body, but rather a space for public deliberation. A far more prevalent criticsm runs in the opposite direction: that the group has no established procedure for adopting consensus statements or advocacies.

The WSF is also subject to the same criticisms as the anti/alternative globalisation movements, namely that the globalisation and capitalism they oppose are inevitable, or that globalisation and capitalism are the most effective means of addressing global poverty. WSF participants have responded that the idea of the 'inevitability' of globalisation is simply an ideological myth, hence their embrace of the slogan, 'Another World is Possible'.

Right-wing opponents of the current global order have criticised the supposed Pluralism of the WSF, as it only includes movements on the left (from social democrats to anarchists).

Some activities by activists attending the WSF have also been criticised, such as in the WSF 2001, where activists invaded and destroyed a plantation of experimental transgenics of the Monsanto enterprise. {Link without Title}


FURTHER READING

  • Jose Correa Leite (2005), ''The World Social Forum: Strategies of Resistance'', Haymarket Books {Link without Title}

  • Jackie Smith. (2004). The World Social Forum and the challenges of global democracy. ''Global Networks''. 4(4):413-421.

  • T. Teivainen. (2002). The World Social Forum and global democratisation: learning from Porto Alegre. ''Third World Quarterly''. 23(4):621-632.



SEE ALSO



EXTERNAL LINKS



Past forums



Future forums