Intellect Article Index for
Intellect
Website Links For
Intelligence
 

Information About

Intellect





DEFINITIONS OF INTELLIGENCE


At least two major "consensus" definitions of intelligence have been proposed. First, from "Intelligence: Knowns and Unknowns" a report of a task force convened by the American Psychological Association in 1995:
Individuals differ from one another in their ability to understand complex ideas, to adapt effectively to the environment, to learn from experience, to engage in various forms of reasoning, to overcome obstacles by taking thought. Although these individual differences can be substantial, they are never entirely consistent: a given person’s intellectual performance will vary on different occasions, in different domains, as judged by different criteria. Concepts of "intelligence" are attempts to clarify and organize this complex set of phenomena.


A second definition of intelligence comes from "Mainstream Science on Intelligence", which was signed by 52 intelligence researchers in 1994;
a very general mental capability that, among other things, involves the ability to reason, plan, solve problems, think abstractly, comprehend complex ideas, learn quickly and learn from experience. It is not merely book learning, a narrow academic skill, or test-taking smarts. Rather, it reflects a broader and deeper capability for comprehending our surroundings—"catching on", "making sense" of things, or "figuring out" what to do.


Individual intelligence experts have offered a number of similar definitions.
  • David Wechsler : "... the aggregate or global capacity of the individual to act purposefully, to think rationally, and to deal effectively with his environment."

  • Cyril Burt : "...innate general cognitive ability."

  • Howard Gardner : "To my mind, a human intellectual competence must entail a set of skills of problem solving—enabling the individual to resolve genuine problems or difficulties that he or she encounters and, when appropriate, to create an effective product—and must also entail the potential for finding or creating problems—and thereby laying the groundwork for the acquisition of new knowledge."

  • Herrnstein and Murray: "...cognitive ability."

  • Sternberg and Salter: "...goal-directed adaptive behavior."



PSYCHOMETRIC INTELLIGENCE

''Main articles: IQ , General Intelligence Factor ''

Despite the variety of concepts of intelligence, the most influential approach to understanding intelligence (i.e., the one that has generated the most systematic research) is based on Psychometric testing.

Intelligence, narrowly defined, can be measured by intelligence tests, also called IQ (intelligence quotient) tests. Such tests are among the most accurate ( Reliable and Valid ) Psychological Tests . Such intelligence tests take many forms, but the common tests ( Stanford-Binet , Raven's Progressive Matrices , Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale , Wechsler-Bellevue I , and others) all measure the same dominant form of intelligence, ''g'' or " General Intelligence Factor ". The abstraction of ''g'' stems from the observation that scores on all forms of cognitive tests Correlate positively with one another. ''g'' can be derived as the principle factor from cognitive test scores using the method of Factor Analysis .

In the psychometric view, the concept of intelligence is most closely identified with ''g'', or Gf ( "fluid G" ). However, psychometricians can measure a wide range of abilities, which are distinct yet correlated. One common view is that these abilities are hierarchically arranged with ''g'' at the vertex (or top, overlaying all other cognitive abilities).


Intelligence, IQ, and ''g''


Intelligence, tests. The dimensionality of IQ scores can be studied by factor analysis, which reveals a single dominant factor underlying the scores on all IQ tests. This factor, which is a hypothetical construct, is called ''g''. Variation in ''g'' corresponds closely to the intuitive notion of ''intelligence'', and thus ''g'' is sometimes called ''general cognitive ability'' or ''general intelligence''.


Criticisms of the psychometric approach


Theorists critical of the psychometric approach, such as Robert Sternberg, point out that people in the general population have a somewhat different conception of intelligence than most experts. In turn, they argue that the psychometric approach measures only a part of what is commonly understood as intelligence. Scholars who believe that intelligence tests accurately measure intelligence argue that lack of agreement over the definition of intelligence does not itself invalidate the measure. They argue that many scientific concepts were accurately measured before it was understood what was actually being measured (e.g., gravity, temperature, and radiation).


ONE OR SEVERAL TYPES OF INTELLIGENCE?


Most experts accept the concept of a single dominant factor of intelligence, general mental ability or ''g'', while others argue that intelligence consists of a set of relatively independent abilities ( American Psychological Association task force report , Gottfredson 1998). The evidence for ''g'' comes from factor analysis of tests of cognitive abilities. The methods of factor analysis do not guarantee a single dominant factor will be discovered. Other Psychological Tests which do not measure cognitive ability, such as Personality Tests , generate multiple factors.

Proponents of multiple-intelligence theories often claim that ''g'' is, at best, a measure of academic ability. Other types of intelligence, they claim, might be just as important outside of a school setting.

Yale psychologist Robert J. Sternberg has proposed a and claim it is at least as important as more traditional sorts of intelligence. These theories grew from observations of human development and of brain injury victims who demonstrate an acute loss of a particular cognitive function -- e.g. the ability to think numerically, or the ability to understand written language -- without showing any loss in other cognitive areas.

In response, ''g'' theorists have pointed out that ''g'''s . This suggests that the tests are ''not'' unrelated, but that they all tap a common factor.


CONTROVERSIES

Researchers in the field of human intelligence have encountered a considerable amount of public concern and criticism - much more than many scientists would be accustomed to or comfortable with (for examples, see Gottfredson , 2005). Some of the controversial topics include:
  • The relevance of psychometric intelligence to the common-sense understanding of the topic.

  • The importance of intelligence in everyday life (see IQ ).

  • The genetic and environmental contributions to individual variation in intelligence (see Nature Versus Nurture ).

  • Differences in average measured intelligence between different groups and the source and meaning of these differences (see Race And Intelligence and Sex And Intelligence ).


Stephen Jay Gould is the preeminent popular critic of claims about intelligence. In his book '' The Mismeasure Of Man '', Gould makes the following claims about intelligence:
  • Intelligence is not measurable.

  • Intelligence is not innate.

  • Intelligence is not heritable.

  • Intelligence cannot be captured in a single number.


However it is reported that he has largely ignored at least a decade of important recent research and draws from outdated information to validate his conclusions.


REFERENCES

  • 1

  • Coward, W.M. and Sackett, P.R. (1990). Linearity of ability-performance relationships: A reconfirmation. ''Journal of Applied Psychology,'' 75:297–300.

  • Gardner, H., Kornhaber, M. and Wake, W. (1996). Intelligence: Multiple Perspectives. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.

  • Gottfredson, L. S. (Ed.) (1997). Intelligence and social policy. ''Intelligence'', 24(1). (Special issue) PDF

  • Gottfredson, L. S. (1998). The general intelligence factor. ''Scientific American Presents,'' 9(4):24-29. PDF

  • Gottfredson, L. S. (2005). Suppressing intelligence research: Hurting those we intend to help. In R. H. Wright & N. A. Cummings (Eds.), Destructive trends in mental health: The well-intentioned path to harm (pp. 155-186). New York: Taylor and Francis. Pre-print PDF PDF

  • 2

  • Hawkings, Jeff (2005). ''On intelligence'', Times Books, Henry Holt and Co. ISBN 0-8050-7456-2

  • Hunt, E. (2001). Multiple views of multiple intelligence. of Intelligence Reframed: Multiple Intelligences for the 21st Century. ''Contemporary Psychology,'' 46:5-7.

  • Hunter, J.E. and Hunter, R.F. (1984). Validity and utility of alternate predictors of job performance. ''Psychological Bulletin,'' 96(1):72-98.

  • Jensen, A.R. (1998). ''The ''g'' Factor.'' Praeger, Connecticut, USA.

  • Kline, P. (2000). ''A Psychometrics Primer''. London: Free Association Books.

  • 3

  • 4

  • 5

  • McClearn, G. E., Johansson, B., Berg, S., Pedersen, N. L., Ahern, F., Petrill, S. A., & Plomin, R. (1997). Substantial genetic influence on cognitive abilities in twins 80 or more years old. Science, 276, 1560-1563.

  • Michael A. McDaniel, Big-brained people are smarter: A meta-analysis of the relationship between in vivo brain volume and intelligence, Intelligence, Volume 33, Issue 4, July-August 2005, Pages 337-346. {Link without Title}

  • Murray, Charles (1998). Income Inequality and IQ, AEI Press PDF

  • 6

  • Noguera, P.A. (2001). Racial politics and the elusive quest for excellence and equity in education. In Motion Magazine article

  • R. Plomin, J. C. DeFries, G. E. McClearn, M. Rutter, ''Behavioral Genetics'' (Freeman, New York, ed. 3, 1997).

  • 7

  • Terman, L. (1916). The Uses of Intelligence Tests.



SEE ALSO



EXTERNAL LINKS