Hedonism Articles about
Hedonism 		Website Links For
Hedonism 		 

Information About

Hedonism
  CATEGORIES ABOUT HEDONISM
   
ethical schools and movements
   
motivation
   
ethics
   
utilitarianism
   
SHOPPER'S DELIGHT
 
Shop For:  
Department
Price Minimum:
Price Maximum:
      



The hedonistic view focuses on increasing ''pleasure'' and reducing ''pain''. Note that while the terms were originally employed literally, this is no longer the case. There seems to be no common ground on what actually constitutes pleasurable or painful activities. The hedonistic Philosophy usually has a Sexual or Liberal connotation.


BASIC CONCEPTS

The basic idea behind hedonistic thought is that all actions can be measured on the basis of how much ''pleasure'' and how little ''pain'' they produce. In very simple terms, a hedonist strives to maximise this 'ratio' (pleasure over pain). The nineteenth-century British philosophers John Stuart Mill and Jeremy Bentham established the fundamental principles of hedonism through their ethical theory of Utilitarianism . Utilitarian value stands as a precursor to hedonistic values in that all action should be directed toward achieving the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest number of people. Though consistent in their pursuit of happiness, Bentham and Mill’s hedonistic values are faintly divergent in relation to their exposition of the principle of utility. There are two basic schools of thought on hedonism:

  • One school, grouped around Jeremy Bentham , argues a quantitative approach. Bentham believed that the value of a pleasure could be quantitatively understood. Essentially, he believed the value of a pleasure to be its intensity multiplied by its duration - so it was not just the number of pleasures, but their intensity and how long they lasted that must be taken into account.

  • Other proponents, like John Stuart Mill argue a qualitative approach. Mill believed that there can be different levels of pleasure - higher quality pleasure is better than lower quality pleasure. Mill also argues that simpler beings (he often references Pig s) have an easier access to the simpler pleasures; since they do not see other aspects of life, they can simply indulge in their pleasures. The more elaborate beings tend to spend more thought on other matters and hence lessen the time for simple pleasure. It is therefore more difficult for them to indulge in such 'simple pleasures' in the same manner.


There are problems with this: generally, ''pleasures'' do not necessarily share common traits, besides the fact that they can be seen as "pleasurable": it is frequently argued that what is 'pleasant' is a subjective thing, differing between individuals, and thus difficult to study objectively and in terms of universal absolutes. The standards of what ought to be "pleasurable" vary (e.g., Sadism ).


PREDECESSORS

might later decrease interest in sex, which may cause one to be dissatisfied with one's sexual partner leading to unhappiness.


HEDONISM AND EGOISM

Hedonism can be conjoined with either naturally seek pleasure, or ethical hedonism, the claim that we ''should'' act so as to produce our own pleasure.

One constant objection is that where one finds pleasure, another may find pain, leading to a contradiction in what the Moral act is. This is only a contradiction for Moral Absolutists . From a Moral Relativist's point of view, there is no contradiction.

However, hedonism is not necessarily related to Egoism . The Utilitarianism of John Stuart Mill is sometimes classified as a type of hedonism, as it judges the morality of actions by their consequent contributions to the greater good and Happiness of all. Note that this is Altruistic hedonism. Whereas some hedonistic doctrines propose doing whatever makes an individual happiest (over the long run), Mill promotes actions which make ''everyone'' happy. Compare Individualism and Collectivism .

It is true that Epicurus recommends for us to pursue our own pleasure, but he never suggests we should live a selfish life which impedes others from getting to that same objective.

Some of Sigmund Freud 's theories of human motivation have been called psychological hedonism; his "life instinct" is essentially the observation that people will pursue pleasure. However, he introduces extra complexities with various other mechanisms, such as the "death instinct". The fact that he leaves out the instinct to survive as a primary motivator, and that his hypotheses are notoriously invalidated by objective testing, casts doubt on this theory.

'' with the priority purpose of lavishly enjoying God through knowing, worshipping, and serving Him. This philosophy recommends pursuing one's own happiness in God as the ultimate in human pleasure. Similar to the Epicurean view, the highest pleasure is regarded as something long-term and found not in indulgence but in a life devoted to God. Serious questions have been raised within the Christian community as to whether Christian Hedonism displaces "love God" with "enjoy God" as the greatest and foremost commandment.

A typical apologetic for Christian Hedonism follows: It would seem that if you were to love something truly, then you must truly enjoy it. Thus, Christian Hedonism is exemplified in relation to Jesus Christ, who justifies God in loving a rebellious creation by providing the sacrifice of Himself as the payment allowing God to love us, and us to love Him, forever. It could be summed up in this statement: "God is most glorified in us, when we are most satisfied in Him".

Quite a few people equate hedonism with sexuality and having a very loose or liberal view of the morality of sex. As noted above, many (perhaps most) forms of hedonism actually concentrate on Spiritual , Intellectual , or otherwise non-sexual forms of pleasure. The pursuit of sexual pleasure can certainly be a form of hedonism, but it is not the mainstream one. However, this has become the mainstream use of the word.


SEE ALSO



EXTERNAL LINKS