| First-class Cricket |
Website Links For Cricket |
Information AboutFirst-class Cricket |
|
Point of Origin The point of origin of first-class cricket is controversial and the issue has never been satisfactorily resolved. As Of 2005 , members of the Association Of Cricket Statisticians And Historians (ACS) are striving to resolve the matter and the ACS committee has been asked to address the issue as a priority at the society's 2006 AGM. At one time, some cricket historians held that 1864 marked the origin of first-class cricket because that was when Overarm Bowling was officially introduced. This date was rejected by other historians who argued that standards of play during the so-called "roundarm era" could not be termed "second-class". One prominent statistician then effectively challenged the 1864 date by producing a book of records that began in 1815 , the year in which cricket began its recovery from the impact of the Napoleonic War . Although 1815 ensured that the whole of the roundarm era was included in the first-class records, roundarm did not begin in any real sense until 1827 and was not legalised until 1835 ; and even then the Laws had to be reinforced in 1845 by removing the benefit of the doubt from the bowler in the matter of his hand’s height when delivering the ball. For most of the period from 1815 to 1845, underarm bowling continued to prevail and so 1815 as the point of origin was resisted by champions of the "underarm era" which had existed from time immemorial. As a result, some statisticians began to include games from the 18th Century in their first-class records. The main difficulty encountered by researchers before 1815 is the absence of match details and there are numerous matches in the 18th Century which are known about in name only, with no scores having survived. The ACS decided sometime since 1980 that the first-class records should include all Gentlemen V Players matches and these began in 1806 but for some unexplained reason, the ACS decided to "dump" the start date into the century convenient year of 1801 and then left it there "pending further research". It is only in 2005 that the 1801 startpoint has been seriously challenged. Scorecards for matches prior to 1801 have been loaded into the ACS-supported CricketArchive database and there classified as major or minor pending an overall accord with the ACS, which is hoped to be achieved at the 2006 AGM as mentioned above. There is a continuous though incomplete record from 1772 and there are surviving scorecards from a few earlier games, including two in 1744 . Some statisticians hold that the earlier games are too isolated for inclusion and that the first-class timespan should commence in 1772. The latest view that has been published by the ACS is that the point of origin is 1660 . Historical evidence points to this date, in the aftermath of the Restoration as the time when teams of "county strength" were first assembled. It is argued that 1660 should be the startpoint so as to encompass all matches that ultimately come to light. No doubt the issue will continue to be discussed for some time to come. Conduct of a game of first-class cricket The game is conducted similarly to Test Cricket , though usually of a maximum length of three or four days rather than the five of Test cricket (though a few are). (Technically, Test cricket is a form of first-class cricket. However, the term "first class" is usually used to refer to domestic competition only.) Around the world, these teams are usually representative of internal political divisions — for instance, Australia's domestic first-class competition is between state representative teams. Due to the time demands of such a competition, first-class cricketers are mostly paid professionals. A first class match played domestically has the same rules as Test matches, except for the number of days of play. Normally, the matches are conducted over three or four days. The follow-on rule The follow-on minimum lead requirement in any two-innings cricket match is:
If the whole first day of play is abandoned without a ball being bowled, then the number of days considered for the sake of calculating follow on are counted from the actual start of play. For example, if the first day of a four-day match is abandoned due to weather or other reasons, then the match is counted as a three-day one for the sake of determining follow on. (This would not make a difference if only one day is lost in a four-day match because the follow on requirement is the same for matches of four or three days.) Definition of first-class cricket As well as domestic competition, it is typical for international teams touring another country to play warm-up first-class matches against domestic teams. However, with the increasing schedule of international players and consequent more tightly-scheduled tours, the number of such one-off games is decreasing. According to the International Cricket Council , a match is first class if:
A Test Match is a first class match played between two Full Member countries given the status of a Test match-playing nation by the International Cricket Council, following the Playing Conditions for Test Matches established by the International Cricket Council, and following various other regulations. The following matches or competitions are also recognized as first-class by the appropriate Boards of Cricket, providing the above regulations are met:
Notes:
See also External links
|