| Dictatorships And Double Standards |
Website Links For Double |
Information AboutDictatorships And Double Standards |
|
The crux of her argument was that authoritarian regimes (on the "right") deserve US support because they are not as bad as Communist regimes (on the "left"): :Traditional autocrats leave in place existing allocations of wealth, power, status, and other resources, which in most traditional societies favor an affluent few and maintain masses in poverty. But they worship traditional gods and observe traditional taboos. They do not disturb the habitual rhythms of work and leisure, habitual places of residence, habitual patterns of family and personal relations. {Link without Title} The Brothers Judd summarize the upshot of this as follows: :Because this is the case, they in fact preserve many of the institutions upon which democracy can later be built, whether the Church or corporations or other civic organizations. Totalitarian regimes, on the other hand, as the name implies, seek to totally reinvent and control every aspect of society. This requires them to so violate the existing institutions as to render the society nearly incapable of evolving into a Democracy . {Link without Title} CRITICAL ASSESSMENTS It has been called: :one of the three most famous essays in the history of American foreign policy, "Dictatorships and Double Standards," Commentary (November 1979)--the other two being George F. Kennan 's call for "containment" of the Soviet Union and The End Of History by Francis Fukuyama . EXTERNAL LINKS |