| Skyjacking |
Website Links For Aircraft |
Information AboutSkyjacking |
| CATEGORIES ABOUT AIRCRAFT HIJACKING | |
| terrorism tactics | |
| airliner hijackings | |
| aviation risks | |
| air safety | |
| SHOPPER'S DELIGHT | |
|
Aircraft hijacking (also known as '''Skyjacking''') is the take-over of an Aircraft , by a person or group, usually armed. Unlike the Hijacking of land vehicles, it is usually not perpetrated in order to rob the cargo. Rather, most aircraft hijackings are committed to use the passengers as Hostage s in an effort to obtain transportation to a given location, to hold them for ransom, or, as in the case of the American planes that were hijacked to Cuba during the 1970s , the release of comrades being held in prison. Another common motive is Publicity for some cause or grievance. In the September 11, 2001 Attacks , the use of hijacked planes as suicide missiles changed the way hijacking was perceived as a security threat — though similar usages had apparently been attempted by Samuel Byck in 1974 and on Air France Flight 8969 in 1994 . One task of Airport Security is to prevent hijacks by screening passengers and keeping anything that could be used as a Weapon (even smaller objects like nail clippers and boxcutters, for example) off aircraft. BACKGROUND Hijackings for hostages have usually followed a pattern of negotiations between the hijackers and the authorities, followed by some form of settlement -- not always the meeting of the hijackers' original demands -- or the storming of the aircraft by armed police or special forces to rescue the hostages. Previous to September, 2001, the policy of most airlines was for the pilot to comply with hijackers' demands in the hope of a peaceful outcome. Since then, policies have reversed course, in favor of arming and armoring the cockpit. The first recorded aircraft hijack was on February 21 , 1931 , in Arequipa, Peru . Byron Rickards flying a Ford Tri-motor was approached on the ground by armed revolutionaries. He refused to fly them anywhere and after a ten day stand-off Rickards was informed that the revolution was successful and he could go in return for giving one of their number a lift to Lima. Most hijackings have not been so farcical. The first hijack of a commercial airliner probably happened on June 16 , 1948 , when a failed attempt to gain control of the Miss Macao , a Cathay Pacific seaplane caused it to crash into the sea off Macau . On June 30 1948, a Bulgaria n commercial Junkers plane was successfully hijacked to Istanbul by a discharged diplomat and his family, who had to shoot dead the co-pilot (who happened to be the head of Bulgaria's civil aviation) and the radio operator in order to escape to the West . On September 12 1948 a Greek T.A.E Airlines plane was successfully hijacked by 6 pro-communist students who wanted passage to Yugoslavia . The plane landed near Skopje and returned to Thessaloniki later that evening. Since 1947, 60% of hijackings have been refugee escapes. In 1968-69 there was a massive rise in the number of hijackings. In 1968 there were 27 hijackings and attempted hijackings to Cuba. In 1969 there were 82 recorded hijack attempts worldwide, more than twice the total attempts for the whole period 1947-67. Most were Palestinian s using hijacks as a political weapon to publicise their cause and to force the Israeli government to release Palestinian prisoners from jail. Airliner hijackings have declined since the peak of 385 incidents between 1967-76. In 1977-86 the total had dropped to 300 incidents and in 1987-96 this figure was reduced to 212. PARTIAL LIST OF HIJACKINGS
PREVENTION There has been talk of fortifying Cockpit doors to prevent would-be hijackers from entering and gaining control of the aircraft. In the United States and Australia , Air Marshal s have also been added to some flights to deter and thwart hijackers. In addition, some have proposed remote control systems for aircraft whereby no one on board would have control over the plane's flight. In the case of a serious risk that an aircraft will be used for flying into a target, it may have to be shot down, killing all passengers and crew, to prevent more serious consequences. United States commercial aircraft pilots now have an option of carrying a pistol on the flight deck, as a last resort to thwart hijack attempts. Opponents proposed that shooting down the aircraft and killing everyone onboard would be more reasonable than a pilot firing a pistol in an airliner at a flight deck intruder. Explosive Decompression in an aircraft, however, is a myth, and their objections are mostly hyperbole. {Link without Title} Since "Hi, Jack" and "hijack" are Homophones while aircraft are very vulnerable to any breaches to safety and security, this pronunciation is now widely regarded as a serious taboo in more airports. Los Angeles International Airport has reminded people not to say "Hi, Jack" or "Hey, Jack", but "Hello, Jack" is no problem. INTERNATIONAL LAW ISSUES Convention on Offences and Certain Other Acts Committed on Board Aircraft (Tokyo Convention) See the United Nations website for full text. http://www.unodc.org/unodc/terrorism_convention_aircraft.html Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Seizure of Aircraft (Hague Convention) Signed in the Hague, on the 16th December 1970. Contains 14 articles relating to what constitutes hijacking and guidelines for what is expected of governments when dealing with hijackings. The convention does not apply to customs, law enforcement or military aircraft. Thus its scope appears to exclusively encompass civilian aircraft. Importantly, the convention only comes into force if the aircraft takes off or lands in a place different to its place of registration. For aircraft with joint registration, one country is designated as the registration state for the purpose of the convention. See the United Nations website for full text. http://www.unodc.org/unodc/terrorism_convention_aircraft_seizure.html Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts Against the Safety of Civil Aviation (Montreal Convention) In force as of 26th January 1973. It deals with what constitutes an action against the safety of an aircraft, and who is to be considered the perpetrators of this offence and their accomplices. It details the steps to be taken by member states for cooperation in the prosecution and punishment of offenders. This convention applies if the take off or landing place of the aircraft is outside of the aircraft's state of registration, or simply if the offence occurred outside of the aircraft's state of registration (depending on the offence). The convention will also apply if the alleged perpetrator is found in a state outside of the aircraft's state of registration. The convention does not apply to customs, law enforcement or military aircraft. See the United Nations website for full text. http://www.unodc.org/unodc/terrorism_convention_civil_aviation.html SEE ALSO |